Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, 6th Floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 7NF, UK.
Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, 6th Floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 7NF, UK.
J Affect Disord. 2019 Oct 1;257:461-469. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.06.025. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
Cognitive theories suggest people with depression interpret self-referential social information negatively. However, it is unclear whether these biases precede or follow depression. We investigated whether facial expression recognition was associated with depressive symptoms cross-sectionally and longitudinally.
Prospective cohort study of people who had visited UK primary care in the past year reporting depressive symptoms (n = 509). Depressive symptoms were measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) at four time-points, 2 weeks apart. A computerised task assessed happy and sad facial expression recognition at three time-points (n = 505 at time 1). The unbiased hit rate measured ability to recognise emotions accounting for any general tendency to identify the emotion when it was not present.
The sample included the full range of depressive symptom severity, with 45% meeting diagnostic criteria for depression. There was no evidence that happy or sad unbiased hit rates were associated with concurrent or subsequent depressive symptoms. There was weak evidence that, for every additional face incorrectly classified as happy, concurrent PHQ-9 scores reduced by 0.05 of a point (95% CI = -0.10 to 0.002, p = 0.06 after adjustment for confounders). This association was strongest for more ambiguous facial expressions (interaction term p<0.001).
This was an observational study with relatively short follow-up (6 weeks) and small changes in depressive symptoms and emotion recognition. Only 7% of invited patients consented to participate.
Reduced misclassifications of ambiguous faces as happy could be a state marker of depression, but was not associated with subsequent depressive symptoms. Future research should focus on the interpretation of ambiguous social information.
认知理论表明,抑郁患者会对自我参照的社会信息做出负面解释。然而,这些偏见是先于还是后于抑郁出现还不清楚。我们研究了面部表情识别是否与抑郁症状存在横断面和纵向关联。
这是一项前瞻性队列研究,研究对象为过去一年内在英国初级保健机构就诊并报告有抑郁症状的人群(n=509)。使用患者健康问卷(PHQ-9)在 4 个时间点(间隔 2 周)测量抑郁症状。使用计算机化任务在 3 个时间点(n=505 在第 1 次)评估快乐和悲伤的面部表情识别。无偏差的命中率衡量了识别情绪的能力,同时考虑了在情绪不存在时识别情绪的任何一般倾向。
该样本包括了抑郁症状严重程度的全范围,其中 45%符合抑郁症的诊断标准。没有证据表明快乐或悲伤的无偏差命中率与当前或随后的抑郁症状有关。有微弱的证据表明,对于每一张被错误归类为快乐的面部表情,当前 PHQ-9 评分会降低 0.05 分(在调整混杂因素后,95%CI=-0.10 至 0.002,p=0.06)。这种关联在更模棱两可的面部表情中最强(交互项 p<0.001)。
这是一项观察性研究,随访时间相对较短(6 周),抑郁症状和情绪识别的变化较小。只有 7%的受邀患者同意参与。
减少对面部表情的错误分类为快乐可能是抑郁的一种状态标志物,但与随后的抑郁症状无关。未来的研究应集中于对模棱两可的社会信息的解释。