Department of Health and Human Services, Mood Brain and Development Unit, Emotion and Development Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Depress Anxiety. 2018 Dec;35(12):1207-1217. doi: 10.1002/da.22810. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
Although severe irritability is a predictor of future depression according to recent meta-analytic evidence, other mechanisms for this developmental transition remain unclear. In this study, we test whether deficits in emotion recognition may partially explain this specific association in youth with severe irritability, defined as disruptive mood dysregulation disorder (DMDD).
Participants aged 8-20 years (M = 13.3, SD = 2.8) included youth with DMDD, split by low depressive (DMDD/LD; n = 52) and high depressive (DMDD/HD; n = 25) symptoms, and healthy controls (HC; n = 39). A standardized computer task assessed emotion recognition of faces and voices of adults and children expressing happiness, fear, sadness, and anger. A Group (3) × Emotion (4) × Actor (2) × Modality (2) repeated measures analysis of covariance examined the number of errors and misidentification of emotions. Linear regression was then used to assess whether deficits in emotion recognition were predictive of depressive symptoms at a 1 year follow-up.
DMDD/HD youth were more likely to interpret happy stimuli as angry and fearful compared to DMDD/LD (happy as angry: p = 0.018; happy as fearful: p = 0.008) and HC (happy as angry: p = 0.014; happy as fearful: p = 0.024). In youth with DMDD, the misidentification of happy stimuli as fearful was associated with higher depressive symptoms at follow-up (β = 0.43, p = 0.017), independent of baseline depressive and irritability symptoms.
Deficits in emotion recognition are associated, cross-sectionally and longitudinally, with depressive symptoms in youth with severe irritability. Future studies should examine the neural correlates that contribute to these associations.
根据最近的荟萃分析证据,严重的易激惹是未来抑郁的预测因素,但这种发展转变的其他机制仍不清楚。在这项研究中,我们测试了情绪识别缺陷是否可以部分解释具有严重易激惹(定义为破坏性心境失调障碍[DMDD])的年轻人中这种特定关联。
参与者年龄在 8 至 20 岁之间(M=13.3,SD=2.8),包括 DMDD 患者,按低抑郁(DMDD/LD;n=52)和高抑郁(DMDD/HD;n=25)症状分层,以及健康对照组(HC;n=39)。一项标准化的计算机任务评估了成年人和儿童表达快乐、恐惧、悲伤和愤怒时的面部和声音的情绪识别。采用 3(组)×4(情绪)×2(演员)×2(模态)重复测量方差分析来检验情绪识别的错误和错误识别次数。然后,采用线性回归来评估情绪识别缺陷是否可以预测 1 年后的抑郁症状。
与 DMDD/LD(将快乐识别为愤怒:p=0.018;将快乐识别为恐惧:p=0.008)和 HC(将快乐识别为愤怒:p=0.014;将快乐识别为恐惧:p=0.024)相比,DMDD/HD 青少年更有可能将快乐刺激解释为愤怒和恐惧。在具有 DMDD 的青少年中,将快乐刺激错误识别为恐惧与随访时更高的抑郁症状相关(β=0.43,p=0.017),独立于基线抑郁和易激惹症状。
情绪识别缺陷与严重易激惹青少年的抑郁症状存在横断面和纵向关联。未来的研究应该检查导致这些关联的神经相关性。