Suppr超能文献

基层医疗门诊就诊的时间分配

Time allocation in primary care office visits.

作者信息

Tai-Seale Ming, McGuire Thomas G, Zhang Weimin

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Rural Public Health, 1266 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-1266, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2007 Oct;42(5):1871-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00689.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To use an innovative videotape analysis method to examine how clinic time was spent during elderly patients' visits to primary care physicians. Secondary objectives were to identify the factors that influence time allocations.

DATA SOURCES

A convenience sample of 392 videotapes of routine office visits conducted between 1998 and 2000 from multiple primary care practices in the United States, supplemented by patient and physician surveys.

RESEARCH DESIGN

Videotaped visits were examined for visit length and time devoted to specific topics--a novel approach to study time allocation. A survival analysis model analyzed the effects of patient, physician, and physician practice setting on how clinic time was spent.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Very limited amount of time was dedicated to specific topics in office visits. The median visit length was 15.7 minutes covering a median of six topics. About 5 minutes were spent on the longest topic whereas the remaining topics each received 1.1 minutes. While time spent by patient and physician on a topic responded to many factors, length of the visit overall varied little even when contents of visits varied widely. Macro factors associated with each site had more influence on visit and topic length than the nature of the problem patients presented.

CONCLUSIONS

Many topics compete for visit time, resulting in small amount of time being spent on each topic. A highly regimented schedule might interfere with having sufficient time for patients with complex or multiple problems. Efforts to improve the quality of care need to recognize the time pressure on both patients and physicians, the effects of financial incentives, and the time costs of improving patient-physician interactions.

摘要

目的

运用一种创新的录像带分析方法,研究老年患者就诊于初级保健医生时门诊时间的分配情况。次要目的是确定影响时间分配的因素。

数据来源

1998年至2000年间,从美国多个初级保健机构选取了392份常规门诊的录像带作为便利样本,并辅以患者和医生调查。

研究设计

对录像门诊进行检查,记录就诊时长以及用于特定主题的时间——这是一种研究时间分配的新颖方法。生存分析模型分析了患者、医生以及医生执业环境对门诊时间分配的影响。

主要发现

门诊中用于特定主题的时间非常有限。就诊时长中位数为15.7分钟,涉及的主题中位数为6个。最长的主题花费约5分钟,而其余主题每个仅花费1.1分钟。虽然患者和医生在某个主题上花费的时间受多种因素影响,但即使就诊内容差异很大,总体就诊时长变化也很小。与每个机构相关的宏观因素对就诊和主题时长的影响,比患者所呈现问题的性质更大。

结论

众多主题争夺就诊时间,导致每个主题的用时都很少。高度严格的时间表可能会干扰为患有复杂或多种问题的患者留出足够时间。提高医疗质量的努力需要认识到患者和医生面临的时间压力、经济激励的影响以及改善医患互动的时间成本。

相似文献

1
Time allocation in primary care office visits.基层医疗门诊就诊的时间分配
Health Serv Res. 2007 Oct;42(5):1871-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00689.x.
7
Setting the revisit interval in primary care.设定初级医疗保健中的复诊间隔。
J Gen Intern Med. 1999 Apr;14(4):230-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.00322.x.

引用本文的文献

2
Multimorbidity patterns and early signals of diabetes in online communities.在线社区中糖尿病的共病模式及早期信号
JAMIA Open. 2025 May 30;8(3):ooaf049. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf049. eCollection 2025 Jun.

本文引用的文献

3
Evaluating the quality of medical care. 1966.评估医疗质量。1966年。
Milbank Q. 2005;83(4):691-729. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00397.x.
5
Testing for statistical discrimination in health care.医疗保健领域中统计性歧视的测试。
Health Serv Res. 2005 Feb;40(1):227-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00351.x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验