Banasik-Jemielniak Natalia, Bokus Barbara
The Maria Grzegorzewska University, ul. Szczęśliwicka 40, 02-353, Warsaw, Poland.
University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2019 Oct;48(5):1217-1240. doi: 10.1007/s10936-019-09654-x.
We explored the topic of irony comprehension by preschoolers. Two hundred and thirty-one children (77 four-year-olds, 89 five-year-olds, and 65 six-year-olds) were tested with the Irony Comprehension Task (ICT, Banasik and Bokus, in: Poster presented at the psycholinguistics conference in Flanders, Berg en Dal, 2012). Participants were asked questions checking comprehension of the intended meaning behind an ironic comment. Four conditions were used for the ironic utterances: targeted (ironic comment was a reference to the addressee's behavior), non-targeted (ironic comment was not a reference to the addressee's behavior), with symmetric dyads (a child said the ironic comment to another child), and asymmetric dyads (an adult said the ironic comment to a child). All groups achieved high irony comprehension scores. The results show a significant difference in accuracy between the 4-year-olds and the 6-year-olds only. The youngest group more accurately understood ironic utterances that referred to the addressee's action than those that did not, while older children did not show these differences. The aspect of who is speaking to whom was also significant only for the youngest children. These results provide important new insights into factors potentially influencing figurative language comprehension. Components such as participant structure and irony type require acknowledgement in the discussion on irony difficulty.
我们探讨了学龄前儿童对反讽理解的话题。231名儿童(77名四岁儿童、89名五岁儿童和65名六岁儿童)接受了反讽理解任务(ICT,巴纳西克和博库斯,发表于:在法兰德斯贝尔根达尔举行的心理语言学会议上展示的海报,2012年)测试。参与者被问及一些问题,以检验他们对反讽评论背后意图含义的理解。反讽话语使用了四种情境:针对目标对象的(反讽评论是针对收件人的行为)、非针对目标对象的(反讽评论不是针对收件人的行为)、对称二元组(一个孩子对另一个孩子说反讽评论)和不对称二元组(一个成年人对一个孩子说反讽评论)。所有组的反讽理解得分都很高。结果显示,只有四岁儿童和六岁儿童在准确性上存在显著差异。最年幼的组更准确地理解了针对收件人行为的反讽话语,而不是那些不针对收件人行为的反讽话语,而年龄较大的儿童则没有表现出这些差异。谁对谁说这一方面也仅对最年幼的儿童有显著影响。这些结果为可能影响比喻性语言理解的因素提供了重要的新见解。在关于反讽难度的讨论中,诸如参与者结构和反讽类型等因素需要得到认可。