Center for Cognitive Science, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, and Neuroscience Institute of Turin.
J Child Lang. 2013 Sep;40(4):741-78. doi: 10.1017/S0305000913000081. Epub 2013 May 7.
Previous studies on children's pragmatic abilities have tended to focus on just one pragmatic phenomenon and one expressive means at a time, mainly concentrating on comprehension, and overlooking the production side. We assessed both comprehension and production in relation to several pragmatic phenomena (simple and complex standard communication acts, irony, and deceit) and several expressive means (linguistic, extralinguistic, paralinguistic). Our study involved 390 Italian-speaking children divided into three age groups: 5;0-5;6, 6;6-7;0, and 8;0-8;6. Children's performance on all tasks improved with their age. Within each age group, children responded more accurately to tasks involving standard communication than to those involving deceit and irony, across all expressive means and for both comprehension and production. Within each pragmatic phenomenon, children responded more accurately to simple acts than to complex ones, regardless of age group and expressive means, i.e., linguistic or extralinguistic. Overall results fit well with the Cognitive Pragmatics theory (Bara, 2010).
先前有关儿童语用能力的研究往往一次只关注一种语用现象和一种表达手段,主要集中在理解方面,而忽略了表达方面。我们评估了与几种语用现象(简单和复杂的标准交际行为、反语和欺骗)和几种表达手段(语言的、非语言的、副语言的)相关的理解和表达。我们的研究涉及 390 名讲意大利语的儿童,分为三个年龄组:5;0-5;6、6;6-7;0 和 8;0-8;6。儿童在所有任务上的表现都随着年龄的增长而提高。在每个年龄组中,与涉及欺骗和反语的任务相比,儿童在涉及标准交际的任务中的反应更准确,所有表达手段的理解和表达都是如此。在每个语用现象中,儿童对简单行为的反应比复杂行为更准确,无论年龄组和表达手段如何,即语言或非语言。总体结果与认知语用学理论(Bara,2010)非常吻合。