Suppr超能文献

研究男男性行为者和高危异性恋人群的新措施:研究结构性干预或大规模社会变革与 HIV 风险行为、服务利用和感染之间联系的工具。

New Measures for Research on Men Who Have Sex with Men and for At-Risk Heterosexuals: Tools to Study Links Between Structural Interventions or Large-Scale Social Change and HIV Risk Behaviors, Service Use, and Infection.

机构信息

Institute for Infectious Disease Research, National Development and Research Institutes, Inc., 71 West 23rd Street, Fourth Floor, New York, NY, 10010, USA.

Center for Drug Use and HIV Research, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

AIDS Behav. 2020 Jan;24(1):257-273. doi: 10.1007/s10461-019-02582-w.

Abstract

Large-scale structural interventions and "Big Events" like revolutions, wars and major disasters can affect HIV transmission by changing the sizes of at-risk populations, making high-risk behaviors more or less likely, or changing contexts in which risk occurs. This paper describes new measures to investigate hypothesized pathways that could connect macro-social changes to subsequent HIV transmission. We developed a "menu" of novel scales and indexes on topics including norms about sex and drug injecting under different conditions, experiencing denial of dignity, agreement with cultural themes about what actions are needed for survival or resistance, solidarity and other issues. We interviewed 298 at-risk heterosexuals and 256 men who have sex with men in New York City about these measures and possible validators for them. Most measures showed evidence of criterion validity (absolute magnitude of Pearson's r ≥ 0.20) and reliability (Cronbach's alpha ≥ 0.70). These measures can be (cautiously) used to understand how macro-changes affect HIV and other risk. Many can also be used to understand risk contexts and dynamics in more normal situations. Additional efforts to improve and to replicate the validation of these measures should be conducted.

摘要

大规模的结构干预措施和“重大事件”,如革命、战争和重大灾害,可以通过改变高危人群的规模、增加或减少高危行为的可能性,或改变风险发生的环境,从而影响 HIV 的传播。本文描述了新的措施来研究假设的途径,这些途径可以将宏观社会变化与随后的 HIV 传播联系起来。我们开发了一系列新的量表和指标,涉及在不同条件下的性和注射毒品规范、尊严被否定的经历、对文化主题的认同(如为了生存或抵抗需要采取哪些行动)、团结等主题。我们在纽约市采访了 298 名高危异性恋者和 256 名男男性接触者,了解了这些措施以及可能的验证方法。大多数措施都显示出了标准效度(皮尔逊 r 的绝对大小≥0.20)和可靠性(克朗巴赫 α≥0.70)的证据。这些措施可用于(谨慎地)了解宏观变化如何影响 HIV 和其他风险。许多措施也可用于了解更正常情况下的风险环境和动态。应该进一步努力改进和复制这些措施的验证。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Historical and theoretical roots of the big events framework.大事件框架的历史和理论根源。
Int J Drug Policy. 2024 Nov;133:104606. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104606. Epub 2024 Oct 7.

本文引用的文献

9
Big Events in Greece and HIV Infection Among People Who Inject Drugs.希腊的重大事件与注射吸毒者中的艾滋病毒感染
Subst Use Misuse. 2015;50(7):825-38. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2015.978659. Epub 2015 Feb 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验