New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
St Petersburg Pavlov State Medical University, St Petersburg, Russia.
Addiction. 2020 Feb;115(2):239-246. doi: 10.1111/add.14735. Epub 2019 Aug 4.
Extended-release formulations of naltrexone have emerged as effective treatment options for opioid use disorder. This post-hoc analysis examined the temporal relationship between episodes of opioid use and subsequent dropout in a placebo-controlled trial of extended-release injection naltrexone (XR-NTX) to draw inferences about the mechanism by which extended blockade of opioid receptors translates into clinical effectiveness.
This was a 24-week multiple-site, double-blind, randomized trial of monthly XR-NTX versus placebo injections. We analyzed time to dropout from treatment using survival analysis with an extended Cox model as a function of treatment (XR-NTX versus placebo) and with weekly urine drug test (UDT) results for opioids at each week as a time-dependent covariate.
Thirteen addiction treatment programs in Russia, 2008-09.
A total of 250 adults with opioid use disorder who had completed in-patient detoxification.
XR-NTX injection or placebo injection every 4 weeks with weekly clinic visits and biweekly counseling.
Urine toxicology for opioids measured weekly and week of dropout from treatment.
The Cox model yielded a significant interaction of time-dependent urine toxicology by treatment (P = 0.024). Among patients receiving placebo, a positive UDT in a given week increased the risk for dropout from treatment in the subsequent week [hazard ratio (HR) = 6.25; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 3.6-10.0], whereas among patients receiving XR-NTX, a positive UDT result showed no significant effect on risk for dropout (HR = 1.67; 95% CI = 0.6-4.5). The proportion of patients who completed all 24 weeks without any positive UDT result was 31% on XR-NTX compared with 20% on placebo (P = 0.051).
Extended-release injection naltrexone was effective at reducing the risk of dropout from opioid use disorder treatment after an episode of opioid use. Just under a third of patients (31%) on XR-NTX had no opioid-positive urine tests across the trial, but the hypothesis that this would differ from placebo (20%) was not confirmed.
纳曲酮的缓释制剂已成为治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的有效治疗选择。本事后分析旨在观察延长阿片受体阻断的时间与接受缓释型纳曲酮(XR-NTX)注射和安慰剂治疗的阿片类药物使用障碍患者随后脱落之间的时间关系,以推断出临床疗效的机制。
这是一项为期 24 周的多中心、双盲、随机试验,比较每月 XR-NTX 注射与安慰剂注射。我们使用生存分析和扩展 Cox 模型来分析治疗期间的脱落时间,将治疗(XR-NTX 与安慰剂)作为函数,并将每周尿液药物测试(UDT)结果作为时间依赖的协变量。
2008-09 年俄罗斯的 13 个成瘾治疗计划。
总共 250 名完成住院戒毒的阿片类药物使用障碍成年人。
每 4 周注射一次 XR-NTX 或安慰剂,每周进行一次诊所就诊和两周一次的咨询。
每周测量尿液中阿片类药物的毒物学,并测量治疗期间的脱落时间。
Cox 模型显示,治疗时尿液毒物学的时间依赖性存在显著的交互作用(P=0.024)。在接受安慰剂的患者中,某一周的 UDT 阳性增加了随后一周脱落治疗的风险[危险比(HR)=6.25;95%置信区间(CI)=3.6-10.0],而在接受 XR-NTX 的患者中,UDT 阳性结果对脱落风险无显著影响(HR=1.67;95%CI=0.6-4.5)。在 XR-NTX 组中,没有任何 UDT 阳性结果的患者完成所有 24 周治疗的比例为 31%,而安慰剂组为 20%(P=0.051)。
在阿片类药物使用障碍患者中,使用纳曲酮的缓释制剂可降低阿片类药物使用后脱落治疗的风险。近三分之一(31%)的 XR-NTX 患者在整个试验中没有阿片类药物阳性尿液检测结果,但这一假设与安慰剂(20%)不同,并未得到证实。