Section of Addiction Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Sam Jackson Hall, Suite 3370, 3245 SW Pavilion Loop, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2023 Feb 14;18(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13722-023-00364-3.
Co-use of stimulants and opioids is rapidly increasing. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have established the efficacy of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), but stimulant use may decrease the likelihood of initiating MOUD treatment. Furthermore, trial participants may not represent "real-world" populations who would benefit from treatment.
We conducted a two-stage analysis. First, associations between stimulant use (time-varying urine drug screens for cocaine, methamphetamine, or amphetamines) and initiation of buprenorphine or extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) were estimated across two RCTs (CTN-0051 X:BOT and CTN-0067 CHOICES) using adjusted Cox regression models. Second, results were generalized to three target populations who would benefit from MOUD: Housed adults identifying the need for OUD treatment, as characterized by the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH); adults entering OUD treatment, as characterized by Treatment Episodes Dataset (TEDS); and adults living in rural regions of the U.S. with high rates of injection drug use, as characterized by the Rural Opioids Initiative (ROI). Generalizability analyses adjusted for differences in demographic characteristics, substance use, housing status, and depression between RCT and target populations using inverse probability of selection weighting.
Analyses included 673 clinical trial participants, 139 NSDUH respondents (weighted to represent 661,650 people), 71,751 TEDS treatment episodes, and 1,933 ROI participants. The majority were aged 30-49 years, male, and non-Hispanic White. In RCTs, stimulant use reduced the likelihood of MOUD initiation by 32% (adjusted HR [aHR] = 0.68, 95% CI 0.49-0.94, p = 0.019). Stimulant use associations were slightly attenuated and non-significant among housed adults needing treatment (25% reduction, aHR = 0.75, 0.48-1.18, p = 0.215) and adults entering OUD treatment (28% reduction, aHR = 0.72, 0.51-1.01, p = 0.061). The association was more pronounced, but still non-significant among rural people injecting drugs (39% reduction, aHR = 0.61, 0.35-1.06, p = 0.081). Stimulant use had a larger negative impact on XR-NTX initiation compared to buprenorphine, especially in the rural population (76% reduction, aHR = 0.24, 0.08-0.69, p = 0.008).
Stimulant use is a barrier to buprenorphine or XR-NTX initiation in clinical trials and real-world populations that would benefit from OUD treatment. Interventions to address stimulant use among patients with OUD are urgently needed, especially among rural people injecting drugs, who already suffer from limited access to MOUD.
兴奋剂和阿片类药物的共同使用正在迅速增加。随机临床试验 (RCT) 已经证实了治疗阿片类药物使用障碍 (MOUD) 的药物的疗效,但兴奋剂的使用可能会降低开始 MOUD 治疗的可能性。此外,试验参与者可能无法代表“真实世界”中会受益于治疗的人群。
我们进行了两阶段分析。首先,使用调整后的 Cox 回归模型,在两项 RCT(CTN-0051 X:BOT 和 CTN-0067 CHOICES)中,对可卡因、甲基苯丙胺或苯丙胺的尿液药物筛查时间变化与丁丙诺啡或延长释放纳曲酮 (XR-NTX) 开始使用之间的关联进行了估计。其次,将结果推广到三个将受益于 MOUD 的目标人群:有住房的成年人,他们需要阿片类药物使用障碍治疗,这是由国家药物使用和健康调查 (NSDUH) 所描述的;进入阿片类药物使用障碍治疗的成年人,由治疗发作数据集 (TEDS) 描述;以及居住在美国农村地区、注射毒品使用率高的成年人,由农村阿片类药物倡议 (ROI) 描述。使用反概率选择加权法,对 RCT 和目标人群之间的人口统计学特征、物质使用、住房状况和抑郁差异进行调整,进行了推广性分析。
分析包括 673 名临床试验参与者、139 名 NSDUH 受访者(加权以代表 661650 人)、71751 个 TEDS 治疗发作和 1933 名 ROI 参与者。大多数参与者年龄在 30-49 岁之间,男性,非西班牙裔白人。在 RCT 中,兴奋剂的使用使 MOUD 开始的可能性降低了 32%(调整后的 HR[aHR] = 0.68,95%CI 0.49-0.94,p = 0.019)。在有住房需求治疗的成年人(减少 25%,aHR = 0.75,0.48-1.18,p = 0.215)和接受阿片类药物使用障碍治疗的成年人(减少 28%,aHR = 0.72,0.51-1.01,p = 0.061)中,兴奋剂使用的相关性略有减弱且不显著。在注射毒品的农村人群中,相关性更为明显,但仍不显著(减少 39%,aHR = 0.61,0.35-1.06,p = 0.081)。与丁丙诺啡相比,兴奋剂的使用对 XR-NTX 的启动具有更大的负面影响,尤其是在农村地区(减少 76%,aHR = 0.24,0.08-0.69,p = 0.008)。
兴奋剂的使用是临床试验和有 MOUD 治疗需求的真实世界人群中开始丁丙诺啡或 XR-NTX 治疗的障碍。迫切需要针对阿片类药物使用障碍患者的兴奋剂使用干预措施,特别是在已经面临 MOUD 治疗机会有限的农村地区注射毒品的人群中。