• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

下一代 DILI 生物标志物:药物开发中生物标志物的鉴定优先级和生物样本采集的最佳实践。

Next-Generation DILI Biomarkers: Prioritization of Biomarkers for Qualification and Best Practices for Biospecimen Collection in Drug Development.

机构信息

Otsuka PDC, Rockville, Maryland, USA.

US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Feb;107(2):333-346. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1571. Epub 2019 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1002/cpt.1571
PMID:31314926
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7006882/
Abstract

The diagnosis and management of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) remains a challenge in clinical trials in drug development. The qualification of emerging biomarkers capable of predicting DILI soon after the initiation of treatment, differentiating DILI from underlying liver disease, identifying the causal entity, and assigning appropriate treatment options after DILI is diagnosed are needed. Qualification efforts have been hindered by lack of properly stored and consented biospecimens that are linked to clinical data relevant to a specific context of use. Recommendations are made for biospecimen collection procedures, with the focus on clinical trials, and for specific emerging biomarkers to focus qualification efforts.

摘要

药物性肝损伤(DILI)的诊断和管理在药物开发的临床试验中仍然是一个挑战。需要有能力预测治疗开始后不久发生的 DILI、区分 DILI 与潜在肝病、识别因果实体以及在诊断出 DILI 后选择适当治疗方案的新兴生物标志物。由于缺乏与特定使用情况相关的临床数据相关联的妥善保存和同意的生物标本,因此阻碍了资格认证工作。针对生物标本采集程序提出了建议,重点是临床试验,并针对特定的新兴生物标志物集中进行资格认证工作。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f7/7006882/a25364ec447a/CPT-107-333-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f7/7006882/76e7f8706b59/CPT-107-333-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f7/7006882/a25364ec447a/CPT-107-333-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f7/7006882/76e7f8706b59/CPT-107-333-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f7/7006882/a25364ec447a/CPT-107-333-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Next-Generation DILI Biomarkers: Prioritization of Biomarkers for Qualification and Best Practices for Biospecimen Collection in Drug Development.下一代 DILI 生物标志物:药物开发中生物标志物的鉴定优先级和生物样本采集的最佳实践。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Feb;107(2):333-346. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1571. Epub 2019 Sep 14.
2
Consensus: guidelines: best practices for detection, assessment and management of suspected acute drug-induced liver injury during clinical trials in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.共识:指南:在临床试验中检测、评估和管理非酒精性脂肪性肝炎患者疑似急性药物性肝损伤的最佳实践。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Mar;49(6):702-713. doi: 10.1111/apt.15153. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
3
Biomarkers of drug-induced liver injury: a mechanistic perspective through acetaminophen hepatotoxicity.药物性肝损伤的生物标志物:通过对乙酰氨基酚肝毒性的机制观点。
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Apr;15(4):363-375. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2021.1857238. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
4
Liver safety assessment: required data elements and best practices for data collection and standardization in clinical trials.肝脏安全性评估:临床试验中数据收集与标准化所需的数据要素及最佳实践
Drug Saf. 2014 Nov;37 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S19-31. doi: 10.1007/s40264-014-0183-6.
5
Consensus guidelines: best practices for detection, assessment and management of suspected acute drug-induced liver injury occurring during clinical trials in adults with chronic cholestatic liver disease.共识指南:成人慢性胆汁淤积性肝病临床试验中疑似急性药物性肝损伤的检测、评估和管理的最佳实践。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Jan;51(1):90-109. doi: 10.1111/apt.15579. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
6
In silico modeling to optimize interpretation of liver safety biomarkers in clinical trials.计算机模拟优化临床试验中肝安全性生物标志物的解读。
Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2018 Feb;243(3):300-307. doi: 10.1177/1535370217740853. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
7
Quantitative Systems Toxicology Approaches to Understand and Predict Drug-Induced Liver Injury.定量系统毒理学方法用于理解和预测药物性肝损伤。
Clin Liver Dis. 2020 Feb;24(1):49-60. doi: 10.1016/j.cld.2019.09.003. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
8
Biospecimen Qualification in a Clinical Biobank of Urological Diseases.泌尿系统疾病临床生物库的生物标本资格认定。
Biopreserv Biobank. 2024 Jun;22(3):257-267. doi: 10.1089/bio.2022.0190. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
9
Qualification of translational safety biomarkers.转化安全性生物标志物的鉴定。
Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2021 Nov;246(22):2391-2398. doi: 10.1177/15353702211002153. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
10
Drug induced liver injury: an update.药物性肝损伤:最新进展。
Arch Toxicol. 2020 Oct;94(10):3381-3407. doi: 10.1007/s00204-020-02885-1. Epub 2020 Aug 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Mechanisms of drug induced liver injury.药物性肝损伤的机制
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2025 May 26;82(1):213. doi: 10.1007/s00018-025-05744-3.
2
Hepatic Safety Considerations in the Use of Ulipristal Acetate for Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids.使用醋酸乌利司他治疗有症状子宫肌瘤时的肝脏安全性考量
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2025 Mar 19;21:367-382. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S273358. eCollection 2025.
3
Establishing reference ranges for circulating biomarkers of drug-induced liver injury in healthy human volunteers.在健康人类志愿者中建立药物性肝损伤循环生物标志物的参考范围。

本文引用的文献

1
α-Glutathione S-Transferase: A New Biomarker for Liver Injury?α-谷胱甘肽S-转移酶:一种用于肝损伤的新型生物标志物?
J Appl Lab Med. 2016 Sep 1;1(2):119-128. doi: 10.1373/jalm.2016.020412.
2
2018 White Paper on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis: focus on flow cytometry, gene therapy, cut points and key clarifications on BAV (Part 3 - LBA/cell-based assays: immunogenicity, biomarkers and PK assays).《2018年生物分析近期问题白皮书:聚焦流式细胞术、基因治疗、切点及对BAV的关键阐释(第3部分 - 基于配体结合分析/细胞的检测:免疫原性、生物标志物及药代动力学检测)》
Bioanalysis. 2018 Dec;10(24):1973-2001. doi: 10.4155/bio-2018-0287. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
3
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 May;91(5):1361-1369. doi: 10.1111/bcp.16371. Epub 2024 Dec 15.
4
Serum glutamate dehydrogenase activity enables sensitive and specific diagnosis of hepatocellular injury in humans.血清谷氨酸脱氢酶活性有助于对人类肝细胞损伤进行灵敏且特异的诊断。
Toxicol Sci. 2025 Feb 1;203(2):171-180. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfae143.
5
Chinese guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of drug-induced liver injury: an update.中国药物性肝损伤诊治指南:更新版。
Hepatol Int. 2024 Apr;18(2):384-419. doi: 10.1007/s12072-023-10633-7. Epub 2024 Feb 24.
6
Industry Review of Best Practices for Risk Management of Drug-Induced Liver Injury from Development to Real-World Use.药物性肝损伤风险管理的最佳实践:从研发到实际应用的行业综述。
Drug Saf. 2024 Jan;47(1):1-22. doi: 10.1007/s40264-023-01360-x. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
7
Challenges and Future of Drug-Induced Liver Injury Research-Laboratory Tests.药物性肝损伤研究-实验室检测的挑战与未来。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 May 27;23(11):6049. doi: 10.3390/ijms23116049.
8
Biomarkers of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) - a systematic review.药物性肝损伤(DILI)的个体化生物标志物:系统评价。
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2021 Nov;17(11):1327-1343. doi: 10.1080/17425255.2021.1999410. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
9
Drug-Induced Liver Injury: Highlights and Controversies in the Recent Literature.药物性肝损伤:近期文献中的要点和争议。
Drug Saf. 2021 Nov;44(11):1125-1149. doi: 10.1007/s40264-021-01109-4. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
10
Deciphering the Dynamic Complexities of the Liver Microenvironment - Toward a Better Understanding of Immune-Mediated liver Injury Caused by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ILICI).解析肝脏微环境的动态复杂性——深入了解免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)引起的免疫介导性肝损伤。
AAPS J. 2021 Aug 16;23(5):99. doi: 10.1208/s12248-021-00629-2.
Patients with stage 3 compared to stage 4 liver fibrosis have lower frequency of and longer time to liver disease complications.
与 4 期肝纤维化相比,3 期肝纤维化患者发生肝脏并发症的频率较低,时间也更长。
PLoS One. 2018 May 10;13(5):e0197117. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197117. eCollection 2018.
4
Sources of Safety Data and Statistical Strategies for Design and Analysis: Clinical Trials.安全性数据来源以及设计与分析的统计策略:临床试验
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2018 Mar;52(2):141-158. doi: 10.1177/2168479017738980. Epub 2017 Nov 12.
5
Assessment of serum bile acid profiles as biomarkers of liver injury and liver disease in humans.评估血清胆汁酸谱作为人类肝损伤和肝病的生物标志物。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 7;13(3):e0193824. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193824. eCollection 2018.
6
Candidate biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of drug-induced liver injury: An international collaborative effort.候选生物标志物用于药物性肝损伤的诊断和预后:一项国际合作研究。
Hepatology. 2019 Feb;69(2):760-773. doi: 10.1002/hep.29802. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
7
What evidence do we need for biomarker qualification?我们需要什么样的证据来确证生物标志物?
Sci Transl Med. 2017 Nov 22;9(417). doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aal4599.
8
Risk stratification after paracetamol overdose using mechanistic biomarkers: results from two prospective cohort studies.对乙酰氨基酚过量使用后使用机制生物标志物进行危险分层:两项前瞻性队列研究的结果。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Feb;3(2):104-113. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(17)30266-2. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
9
Industry Perspective on Biomarker Development and Qualification.生物标志物开发与鉴定的行业视角
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Jan;103(1):27-31. doi: 10.1002/cpt.919. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
10
Dopamine Transporter Neuroimaging as an Enrichment Biomarker in Early Parkinson's Disease Clinical Trials: A Disease Progression Modeling Analysis.多巴胺转运体神经影像学作为早期帕金森病临床试验的富集生物标志物:疾病进展建模分析。
Clin Transl Sci. 2018 Jan;11(1):63-70. doi: 10.1111/cts.12492. Epub 2017 Jul 27.