• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估埃及伊蚊叮咬后致敏和非致敏小鼠的炎症性皮肤浸润,揭示了唾液依赖性和免疫依赖性表型。

Evaluation of inflammatory skin infiltrate following Aedes aegypti bites in sensitized and non-sensitized mice reveals saliva-dependent and immune-dependent phenotypes.

机构信息

Laboratório de Imunologia Experimental, Departamento de Imunologia, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Laboratório de Mosquitos Geneticamente Modificados, Departamento de Parasitologia, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Immunology. 2019 Sep;158(1):47-59. doi: 10.1111/imm.13096.

DOI:10.1111/imm.13096
PMID:31315156
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6700466/
Abstract

During probing and blood feeding, haematophagous mosquitoes inoculate a mixture of salivary molecules into their vertebrate hosts' skin. In addition to the anti-haemostatic and immunomodulatory activities, mosquito saliva also triggers acute inflammatory reactions, especially in sensitized hosts. Here, we characterize the oedema and the cellular infiltrate following Aedes aegypti mosquito bites in the skin of sensitized and non-sensitized BALB/c mice by flow cytometry. Ae. aegypti bites induced an increased oedema in the ears of both non-sensitized and salivary gland extract- (SGE-)sensitized mice, peaking at 6 hr and 24 hr after exposure, respectively. The quantification of the total cell number in the ears revealed that the cellular recruitment was more robust in SGE-sensitized mice than in non-sensitized mice, and the histological evaluation confirmed these findings. The immunophenotyping performed by flow cytometry revealed that mosquito bites were able to produce complex changes in cell populations present in the ears of non-sensitized and SGE-sensitized mice. When compared with steady-state ears, the leucocyte populations significantly recruited to the skin after mosquito bites in non-sensitized and sensitized mice were eosinophils, neutrophils, monocytes, inflammatory monocytes, mast cells, B-cells and CD4 T-cells, each one with its specific kinetics. The changes in the absolute number of cells suggested two cell recruitment profiles: (i) a saliva-dependent migration; and (ii) a migration dependent on the immune status of the host. These findings suggest that mosquito bites influence the skin microenvironment by inducing differential cell migration, which is dependent on the degree of host sensitization to salivary molecules.

摘要

在探测和吸血过程中,吸血蚊子将混合有唾液分子的混合物注入其脊椎动物宿主的皮肤中。除了抗凝血和免疫调节作用外,蚊子唾液还会引发急性炎症反应,尤其是在致敏宿主中。在这里,我们通过流式细胞术来描述 Aedes aegypti 蚊子叮咬在致敏和非致敏 BALB/c 小鼠皮肤中引起的水肿和细胞浸润。Ae. aegypti 叮咬会在非致敏和唾液腺提取物(SGE)致敏的小鼠的耳朵中引起水肿增加,分别在暴露后 6 小时和 24 小时达到峰值。对耳朵中总细胞数的定量表明,在 SGE 致敏的小鼠中,细胞募集比非致敏的小鼠更为强烈,组织学评估证实了这一发现。流式细胞术进行的免疫表型分析表明,蚊子叮咬能够在非致敏和 SGE 致敏的小鼠耳朵中的细胞群中产生复杂的变化。与稳定状态的耳朵相比,在非致敏和致敏的小鼠中,蚊子叮咬后明显募集到皮肤中的白细胞群是嗜酸性粒细胞、中性粒细胞、单核细胞、炎症性单核细胞、肥大细胞、B 细胞和 CD4 T 细胞,每一种都有其特定的动力学。细胞数量的绝对变化表明有两种细胞募集模式:(i)依赖唾液的迁移;(ii)依赖宿主免疫状态的迁移。这些发现表明,蚊子叮咬通过诱导依赖于宿主致敏程度的差异细胞迁移来影响皮肤微环境。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of inflammatory skin infiltrate following Aedes aegypti bites in sensitized and non-sensitized mice reveals saliva-dependent and immune-dependent phenotypes.评估埃及伊蚊叮咬后致敏和非致敏小鼠的炎症性皮肤浸润,揭示了唾液依赖性和免疫依赖性表型。
Immunology. 2019 Sep;158(1):47-59. doi: 10.1111/imm.13096.
2
Exposure to Aedes aegypti Bites Induces a Mixed-Type Allergic Response following Salivary Antigens Challenge in Mice.暴露于埃及伊蚊叮咬会在小鼠唾液抗原激发后引发混合型过敏反应。
PLoS One. 2016 May 20;11(5):e0155454. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155454. eCollection 2016.
3
Specific human antibody responses to Aedes aegypti and Aedes polynesiensis saliva: A new epidemiological tool to assess human exposure to disease vectors in the Pacific.特定的人类抗埃及伊蚊和太平洋波利尼西亚伊蚊唾液的抗体反应:评估太平洋地区人类接触病媒的新流行病学工具。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Jul 24;12(7):e0006660. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006660. eCollection 2018 Jul.
4
Dual effect of Lutzomyia longipalpis saliva on Leishmania braziliensis infection is mediated by distinct saliva-induced cellular recruitment into BALB/c mice ear.长刺革舌蝇唾液对巴西利什曼原虫感染的双重作用是通过不同的唾液诱导细胞募集到 BALB/c 小鼠耳部介导的。
BMC Microbiol. 2013 May 8;13:102. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-13-102.
5
Aedes aegypti saliva impairs M1-associated proinflammatory phenotype without promoting or affecting M2 polarization of murine macrophages.埃及伊蚊唾液可损害与 M1 相关的促炎表型,而不促进或影响小鼠巨噬细胞的 M2 极化。
Parasit Vectors. 2019 May 16;12(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s13071-019-3487-7.
6
Roles of mast cells and histamine in mosquito bite-induced allergic itch-associated responses in mice.肥大细胞和组胺在小鼠蚊虫叮咬诱导的过敏性瘙痒相关反应中的作用。
Jpn J Pharmacol. 2001 May;86(1):97-105. doi: 10.1254/jjp.86.97.
7
Anopheles mosquito bites activate cutaneous mast cells leading to a local inflammatory response and lymph node hyperplasia.按蚊叮咬会激活皮肤肥大细胞,引发局部炎症反应和淋巴结增生。
J Immunol. 2005 Apr 1;174(7):3932-40. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.7.3932.
8
Mosquito saliva alone has profound effects on the human immune system.蚊子的唾液单独就对人体免疫系统有着深远的影响。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 May 17;12(5):e0006439. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006439. eCollection 2018 May.
9
Analysis in a murine model points to IgG responses against the 34k2 salivary proteins from Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti as novel promising candidate markers of host exposure to Aedes mosquitoes.在小鼠模型中的分析表明,针对白纹伊蚊和埃及伊蚊的 34k2 唾液蛋白的 IgG 反应是宿主接触埃及伊蚊的新型有希望的候选标志物。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Oct 16;13(10):e0007806. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007806. eCollection 2019 Oct.
10
Aedes aegypti mosquito saliva ameliorates acetaminophen-induced liver injury in mice.埃及伊蚊唾液可改善乙酰氨基酚诱导的小鼠肝损伤。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 8;16(2):e0245788. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245788. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Atopic Dermatitis Immune Dysregulation as Dengue Predisposing Factor.特应性皮炎免疫失调作为登革热的易感因素。
J Inflamm Res. 2024 Nov 27;17:9875-9887. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S493946. eCollection 2024.
2
Electropenetrography with Alternating Current Reveals In Situ Changes of Probing Behaviors Associated with Dengue Virus Infection.交流电电穿孔法揭示了与登革热病毒感染相关的探测行为的原位变化。
Comp Med. 2024 Aug 1;74(4):284-294. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-CM-24-030. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
3
Establishment of a mouse allergy model for Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae).库蠓(双翅目:蠓科)小鼠过敏模型的建立。
Vet Med Sci. 2024 May;10(3):e1462. doi: 10.1002/vms3.1462.
4
salivary gland extract alleviates acute itching by blocking TRPA1 channels.唾液腺提取物通过阻断TRPA1通道减轻急性瘙痒。
Front Physiol. 2023 Jun 27;14:1055706. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1055706. eCollection 2023.
5
The significance of mosquito saliva in arbovirus transmission and pathogenesis in the vertebrate host.蚊子唾液在虫媒病毒于脊椎动物宿主中的传播及发病机制中的意义。
One Health. 2023 Feb 12;16:100506. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2023.100506. eCollection 2023 Jun.
6
Evaluation of cutaneous immune response in a controlled human in vivo model of mosquito bites.评估在控制的人体体内蚊虫叮咬模型中的皮肤免疫反应。
Nat Commun. 2022 Nov 17;13(1):7036. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-34534-9.
7
salivary proteins adenosine deaminase and 34k2 interact with human mast cell specific proteases tryptase and chymase.唾液蛋白腺嘌呤脱氨酶和 34k2 与人类肥大细胞特异性蛋白酶类胰蛋白酶和糜蛋白酶相互作用。
Bioengineered. 2022 May;13(5):13752-13766. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2022.2081652.
8
Aedes aegypti sialokinin facilitates mosquito blood feeding and modulates host immunity and vascular biology.埃及伊蚊唾液神经肽促进蚊虫吸血,并调节宿主免疫和血管生物学。
Cell Rep. 2022 Apr 12;39(2):110648. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110648.
9
Disease Resolution in Chikungunya-What Decides the Outcome?基孔肯雅热的痊愈——什么决定了结局?
Front Immunol. 2020 Apr 28;11:695. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00695. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Aedes aegypti saliva impairs M1-associated proinflammatory phenotype without promoting or affecting M2 polarization of murine macrophages.埃及伊蚊唾液可损害与 M1 相关的促炎表型,而不促进或影响小鼠巨噬细胞的 M2 极化。
Parasit Vectors. 2019 May 16;12(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s13071-019-3487-7.
2
Immune responses to dengue virus in the skin.皮肤对登革热病毒的免疫反应。
Open Biol. 2018 Aug;8(8). doi: 10.1098/rsob.180087.
3
Treating insect-bite hypersensitivity in horses with active vaccination against IL-5.用针对白细胞介素-5 的主动免疫接种来治疗马的虫咬超敏反应。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018 Oct;142(4):1194-1205.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.01.041. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
4
Comparison of the differential regulation of T and B-lymphocyte subsets in the skin and lymph nodes amongst three cattle breeds as potential mediators of immune-resistance to Rhipicephalus microplus.比较三种牛品种皮肤和淋巴结中 T 和 B 淋巴细胞亚群的差异调节,作为对 Rhipicephalus microplus 免疫抗性的潜在介导物。
Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2018 May;9(4):976-987. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2018.03.034. Epub 2018 Mar 31.
5
Salivary factor LTRIN from Aedes aegypti facilitates the transmission of Zika virus by interfering with the lymphotoxin-β receptor.埃及伊蚊唾液因子 LTRIN 通过干扰淋巴毒素-β 受体促进寨卡病毒的传播。
Nat Immunol. 2018 Apr;19(4):342-353. doi: 10.1038/s41590-018-0063-9. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
6
Skin microbiota-host interactions.皮肤微生物组-宿主相互作用。
Nature. 2018 Jan 24;553(7689):427-436. doi: 10.1038/nature25177.
7
Ticks, , Feed Repeatedly on White-Footed Mice despite Strong Inflammatory Response: An Expanding Paradigm for Understanding Tick-Host Interactions.蜱虫尽管会引发强烈的炎症反应,但仍会反复叮咬白足鼠:这是理解蜱虫与宿主相互作用的一个不断扩展的范例。
Front Immunol. 2017 Dec 18;8:1784. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01784. eCollection 2017.
8
Comparison of clustering methods for high-dimensional single-cell flow and mass cytometry data.高维单细胞流式细胞术和质谱流式细胞术数据聚类方法的比较
Cytometry A. 2016 Dec;89(12):1084-1096. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.23030. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
9
A novel compound 2-(4-{2-[(phenylthio)acetyl]carbonohydrazonoyl}phenoxy)acetamide downregulates TSLP through blocking of caspase-1/NF-κB pathways.一种新型化合物2-(4-{2-[(苯硫基)乙酰基]碳酰肼基}苯氧基)乙酰胺通过阻断半胱天冬酶-1/核因子κB途径下调胸腺基质淋巴细胞生成素。
Int Immunopharmacol. 2016 Sep;38:420-5. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2016.06.019. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
10
Host Inflammatory Response to Mosquito Bites Enhances the Severity of Arbovirus Infection.宿主对蚊虫叮咬的炎症反应会加重虫媒病毒感染的严重程度。
Immunity. 2016 Jun 21;44(6):1455-69. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.06.002.