• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮棘突间撑开器治疗椎管狭窄症：利弊分析。

Percutaneous Interspinous Spacer in Spinal-Canal-Stenosis Treatment: Pros and Cons.

机构信息

Dipartimento di Radiologia, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, 50012 Firenze, Italy.

UOC NINT Neuroimmagini e Neurointerventistica, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, 53100 Siena, Italy.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 Jul 16;55(7):381. doi: 10.3390/medicina55070381.

DOI:10.3390/medicina55070381
PMID:31315310
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6681403/
Abstract

A comprehensive description of the literature regarding interspinous process devices (IPD) mainly focused on comparison with conservative treatment and surgical decompression for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Recent meta-analysis and articles are listed in the present article in order to establish IPD pros and cons.

摘要

对棘突间装置（IPD）的文献进行全面描述，主要集中在与保守治疗和手术减压治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄症的比较。本文列出了最近的荟萃分析和文章，以确定 IPD 的优缺点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0de/6681403/a05b9bda5c67/medicina-55-00381-g004a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0de/6681403/9d2f292d2adf/medicina-55-00381-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0de/6681403/e92ccf1bd98c/medicina-55-00381-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0de/6681403/a5fe2058a712/medicina-55-00381-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0de/6681403/a05b9bda5c67/medicina-55-00381-g004a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0de/6681403/9d2f292d2adf/medicina-55-00381-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0de/6681403/e92ccf1bd98c/medicina-55-00381-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0de/6681403/a5fe2058a712/medicina-55-00381-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0de/6681403/a05b9bda5c67/medicina-55-00381-g004a.jpg

相似文献

1
Percutaneous Interspinous Spacer in Spinal-Canal-Stenosis Treatment: Pros and Cons.经皮棘突间撑开器治疗椎管狭窄症：利弊分析。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 Jul 16;55(7):381. doi: 10.3390/medicina55070381.
2
Interspinous spacer decompression (X-STOP) for lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative disk disease: a multicenter study with a minimum 3-year follow-up.用于腰椎管狭窄症和退行性椎间盘疾病的棘突间撑开减压术（X-STOP）：一项至少随访3年的多中心研究。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014 Sep;124:166-74. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.07.004. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
3
Is the interspinous process device safe and effective in elderly patients with lumbar degeneration? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.棘突间装置在老年腰椎退变患者中是否安全有效？一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Mar;33(3):881-891. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-08119-z. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
4
A Comprehensive Review of Novel Interventional Techniques for Chronic Pain: Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Disc Disease-MILD Percutaneous Image Guided Lumbar Decompression, Vertiflex Interspinous Spacer, MinuteMan G3 Interspinous-Interlaminar Fusion.慢性疼痛新型介入技术的全面综述：腰椎狭窄症和退行性椎间盘疾病——微创经皮影像引导腰椎减压术、Vertiflex 棘突间撑开器、MinuteMan G3 棘突间-椎板间融合术。
Adv Ther. 2021 Sep;38(9):4628-4645. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01875-8. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
5
Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis treatment with Aperius™ PerCLID™ system and Falena® interspinous spacers: 1-year follow-up of clinical outcome and quality of life.使用Aperius™ PerCLID™系统和Falena®棘突间间隔器治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄症：临床结果和生活质量的1年随访
Interv Neuroradiol. 2016 Apr;22(2):217-26. doi: 10.1177/1591019915622163. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
6
Interspinous process devices versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: cost-utility analysis.棘突间装置与标准传统手术减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症的成本效用分析
Spine J. 2016 Jun;16(6):702-10. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.10.017. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
7
[Treatment of dynamic spinal canal stenosis with an interspinous spacer].[采用棘突间撑开器治疗动力性椎管狭窄]
Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2010 Nov;22(5-6):524-35. doi: 10.1007/s00064-010-9042-5.
8
Is There Still a Role for Interspinous Spacers in the Management of Neurogenic Claudication?棘突间撑开器在神经源性间歇性跛行治疗中仍有作用吗？
Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2017 Jul;28(3):321-330. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2017.02.002.
9
Superion interspinous process spacer for intermittent neurogenic claudication secondary to moderate lumbar spinal stenosis: two-year results from a randomized controlled FDA-IDE pivotal trial.用于中度腰椎管狭窄继发间歇性神经源性跛行的Superion棘突间撑开器：一项FDA-IDE随机对照关键试验的两年结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Mar 1;40(5):275-82. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000735.
10
Interspinous process decompression (IPD) system (X-STOP) for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.用于治疗腰椎管狭窄症的棘突间减压（IPD）系统（X-STOP）
Surg Technol Int. 2006;15:265-75.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a new percutaneous interspinous device: a retrospective multicenter study.新型经皮棘突间装置的可行性、安全性和有效性：一项回顾性多中心研究。
Neuroradiology. 2024 Jun;66(6):1049-1056. doi: 10.1007/s00234-024-03343-w. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
2
Percutaneous removal and replacement of a novel percutaneous interspinous device.经皮取出并更换一种新型经皮棘突间装置。
Neuroradiol J. 2024 Oct;37(5):645-648. doi: 10.1177/19714009231212366. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
3
MR-guided spine interventions: time to get off the ground?

本文引用的文献

1
Rates of Mortality in Lumbar Spine Surgery and Factors Associated With Its Occurrence Over a 10-Year Period: A Study of 803,949 Patients in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.腰椎手术的死亡率及其发生相关因素的10年研究：对全国住院患者样本中803,949例患者的研究
Int J Spine Surg. 2018 Oct 15;12(5):617-623. doi: 10.14444/5076. eCollection 2018 Oct.
2
Interspinous process devices for treatment of degenerative lumbar spine stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.棘突间装置治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄症：系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 6;13(7):e0199623. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199623. eCollection 2018.
3
磁共振引导下的脊柱介入治疗：是时候落地生根了吗？
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Nov;9(21):1609. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-5167.
Percutaneous Interspinous Spacer vs Decompression in Patients with Neurogenic Claudication: An Alternative in Selected Patients?
经皮棘突间撑开器与减压术治疗神经性跛行患者：对特定患者的一种替代选择？
Neurosurgery. 2018 May 1;82(5):621-629. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx326.
4
Interspinous implants: are the new implants better than the last generation? A review.棘突间植入物：新一代植入物是否优于上一代？一篇综述。
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017 Jun;10(2):189-198. doi: 10.1007/s12178-017-9401-z.
5
Interspinous implants to treat spinal stenosis.用于治疗椎管狭窄的棘突间植入物。
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017 Jun;10(2):182-188. doi: 10.1007/s12178-017-9413-8.
6
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: How Is It Classified?腰椎管狭窄症：如何进行分类？
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016 Dec;24(12):843-852. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00034.
7
Outcome after Surgery of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Randomized Comparison of Bilateral Laminotomy, Trumpet Laminectomy, and Conventional Laminectomy.腰椎管狭窄症手术后的结果：双侧椎板切开术、喇叭形椎板切除术和传统椎板切除术的随机对照比较
Front Surg. 2016 Apr 8;3:19. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2016.00019. eCollection 2016.
8
Management of lumbar spinal stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症的治疗
BMJ. 2016 Jan 4;352:h6234. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h6234.
9
Guideline summary review: An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.指南简要综述：退行性腰椎滑脱症诊断与治疗的循证临床指南
Spine J. 2016 Mar;16(3):439-48. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.11.055. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
10
Efficacy of Epidural Injections in Managing Chronic Spinal Pain: A Best Evidence Synthesis.硬膜外注射治疗慢性脊柱疼痛的疗效：最佳证据综合分析
Pain Physician. 2015 Nov;18(6):E939-1004.