Psychosocial Interventions Department & Training Center, Fondation Médéric Alzheimer, Paris, France.
University of the French West Indies, Faculty of Medicine, Martinique, France.
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2020 Jan-Dec;35:1533317519859213. doi: 10.1177/1533317519859213. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
A recent review of Cochrane meta-analyses on psychosocial interventions (PIs) concludes that clinical trials fail to confirm PIs effective for all types of dementia at every stage of the disease. This article describes how and to what extent it is necessary to identify treatment indications when researching PIs and employing them in clinical practice. Twelve Cochrane reviews on PIs for people with dementia, selected because of their systematic methodology, were searched to identify outcomes related to treatment indications (dosage, type of dementia, severity…). The authors identified several research and practice issues that related to treatment indications: sample profiling, hypothesizing and statistical interpretation, external validity, effectiveness of interventions, contraindications and limits of interventions, and tailoring. Developing an effective PI requires empirical, developmental, exploratory, and confirmatory development stages to achieve credibility and robustness.
最近对科克伦荟萃分析(Cochrane meta-analyses)关于心理社会干预(psychosocial interventions,PIs)的综述得出结论,临床试验未能证实 PIs 对疾病各个阶段的所有类型痴呆均有效。本文描述了在研究 PIs 并将其应用于临床实践时,确定治疗指征的方法和程度。选择了 12 项基于系统方法的关于痴呆患者 PIs 的科克伦综述,以确定与治疗指征(剂量、痴呆类型、严重程度等)相关的结果。作者确定了与治疗指征相关的几个研究和实践问题:样本分析、假设和统计解释、外部有效性、干预措施的有效性、禁忌和干预措施的局限性以及针对性。开发有效的 PI 需要经验性、发展性、探索性和验证性的发展阶段,以实现可信度和稳健性。