Suppr超能文献

是否存在南南卫生合作的社会公正变体?:范围界定和批判性文献综述。

Is there a social justice variant of South-South health cooperation?: a scoping and critical literature review.

机构信息

a Dalla Lana School of Public Health , University of Toronto , Toronto , Ontario , Canada.

b Bloomberg School of Nursing , University of Toronto , Toronto , Ontario , Canada.

出版信息

Glob Health Action. 2019;12(1):1621007. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2019.1621007.

Abstract

: In recent decades, global health scholars and policymakers have highlighted the burgeoning role of South-South cooperation (SSC) in health, claiming it constitutes a more just and even-handed approach to health cooperation. But the assertion that SSC challenges power asymmetries and pursues egalitarian agendas and forms of interaction merits interrogation. Here we explore a transformative, counter-hegemonic, solidarity-oriented form of SSC - social justice-oriented South-South cooperation (SJSSC) - as differentiated from other types of health aid. : The objectives of this scoping review are: 1) to determine what is known and discussed through peer-reviewed and grey literature about SJSSC in health; and 2) to identify the different features and principles of SJSSC. This review seeks to inform research agendas and identify implications for policy and practice around SJSSC. : We conducted a search for relevant peer-reviewed and grey literature in eight languages and screened abstracts that met inclusion criteria. We carried out a full-text review and data extraction on included pieces and conducted a thematic analysis identifying a set of repeated themes related to the features and principles of SJSSC. : We identified 188 publications meeting our criteria. Through an iterative process, we developed two overarching categories: values and strategies. Each comprises four themes that allowed us to map the ideas and practices of SJSSC depicted in the literature. The values mapped are: an anti-hegemonic world view; equity-oriented and redistributive political values; egalitarian terms of cooperation; and reciprocity. The strategies encompass: solidarity-building; health justice approaches; mutual exchange and collective justice; and challenging interests of dominant classes in the health arena. : This review rectifies ungrounded claims about SSC by identifying and mapping the research literature on SJSSC and has relevance for the conceptualization, policy development, and practice of equitable health cooperation.

摘要

近几十年来,全球卫生学者和政策制定者强调了南南合作(SSC)在卫生领域的蓬勃发展作用,称其构成了一种更公正、更公平的卫生合作方式。但是,断言 SSC 挑战权力不对称,追求平等主义议程和互动形式,这一说法值得质疑。在这里,我们探讨了一种变革性的、反霸权的、以团结为导向的 SSC 形式——社会正义导向的南南合作(SJSSC)——与其他类型的卫生援助区分开来。

这项范围界定审查的目的是

1)确定通过同行评审和灰色文献了解和讨论了哪些关于卫生领域 SJSSC 的知识;2)确定 SJSSC 的不同特征和原则。本综述旨在为研究议程提供信息,并确定 SJSSC 在政策和实践方面的意义。

我们用八种语言搜索了相关的同行评审和灰色文献,并筛选了符合纳入标准的摘要。我们对纳入的论文进行了全文审查和数据提取,并进行了主题分析,确定了一套与 SJSSC 的特征和原则相关的重复主题。

我们确定了 188 篇符合我们标准的出版物。通过迭代过程,我们制定了两个总体类别:价值观和策略。每个类别都包含四个主题,使我们能够描绘文献中 SJSSC 的思想和实践。映射的价值观包括:反霸权世界观;以公平为导向的再分配政治价值观;合作的平等条件;以及互惠。策略包括:建立团结;健康正义方法;相互交流和集体正义;以及在卫生领域挑战主导阶级的利益。

这项审查通过识别和绘制 SJSSC 的研究文献,纠正了对 SSC 的毫无根据的说法,对公平卫生合作的概念化、政策制定和实践具有相关性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd24/6711117/8b28cd4c49a6/ZGHA_A_1621007_F0001_OC.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验