• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创食管切除术后的短期结局

Short-term outcomes after minimally invasive oesophagectomy.

作者信息

Ainsworth Alan Patrick, Larsen Michael Hareskov, Ladegaard Lars, Eckardt Jens, Fristrup Claus Wilki, Mortensen Michael Bau

出版信息

Dan Med J. 2019 Aug;66(8).

PMID:31315797
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Minimally invasive oesophagectomy (MIO) has gained increasing popularity. This study reports the results of the first patients operated using this technique at our department.

METHODS

All procedures were prospectively registered in a database. Patients were followed until death, two years after surgery or 1 January 2019.

RESULTS

A total of 150 procedures were performed (from 23 November 2015 to 27 February 2018). The median proced-ure time decreased from 350 minutes for the initial 75 pa-tients to 320 minutes for the final 75 patients (p < 0.05). Blood loss decreased from 200 ml to 100 ml (p < 0.05), respectively. The conversion rate for the abdominal procedure was 7% for the initial 75 patients and 8% for the final 75 patients (not significant (NS)). For the thoracic procedure, the corresponding figures were 11% and 7% (NS), respectively. Anastomotic leakage was seen in 17% (initial patients) and 11% (final patients) (NS); however, less than 20% of the leakages needed surgical treatment. The median length of post-operative stay was nine days for both groups. For all 150 patients, pulmonary complications were observed in 18% and cardiac complications in 11%. The 30-day mortality rate was 2% and the one-year survival rate was 86% (124 registered patients).

CONCLUSIONS

MIO was introduced at our department with acceptable morbidity and mortality rates and the short-term oncological result was not compromised.

FUNDING

none.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was approved as a quality project by the Region of Southern Denmark (18/37355).

摘要

引言

微创食管切除术(MIO)越来越受欢迎。本研究报告了在我们科室首例使用该技术进行手术的患者的结果。

方法

所有手术均前瞻性地记录在数据库中。对患者进行随访,直至死亡、术后两年或2019年1月1日。

结果

共进行了150例手术(从2015年11月23日至2018年2月27日)。手术中位时间从最初75例患者的350分钟降至最后75例患者的320分钟(p<0.05)。失血量分别从200毫升降至100毫升(p<0.05)。腹部手术的中转率在最初75例患者中为7%,在最后75例患者中为8%(无统计学意义(NS))。对于胸部手术,相应数字分别为11%和7%(NS)。吻合口漏在最初患者中为17%,在最后患者中为11%(NS);然而,不到20%的漏需要手术治疗。两组术后住院中位时间均为九天。在所有150例患者中,观察到肺部并发症的发生率为18%,心脏并发症的发生率为11%。30天死亡率为2%,一年生存率为86%(124例登记患者)。

结论

我们科室引入的MIO具有可接受的发病率和死亡率,且短期肿瘤学结果未受影响。

资金来源

无。

试验注册

该研究被丹麦南部地区批准为质量项目(18/37355)。

相似文献

1
Short-term outcomes after minimally invasive oesophagectomy.微创食管切除术后的短期结局
Dan Med J. 2019 Aug;66(8).
2
Non-inferiority of minimally invasive oesophagectomy: an 8-year retrospective case series.微创食管切除术的非劣效性:8 年回顾性病例系列。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Sep;31(9):3681-3689. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5406-8. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
3
Complications and survival after hybrid and fully minimally invasive oesophagectomy.杂交手术和完全微创食管切除术后的并发症及生存率
BJS Open. 2021 Jan 8;5(1). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa033.
4
Minimally invasive techniques for transthoracic oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: systematic review and network meta-analysis.经胸食管癌微创切除术治疗食管癌的微创技术:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BJS Open. 2020 Oct;4(5):787-803. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50330. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
5
Minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy is a feasible and safe approach for patients with oesophageal cancer.微创Ivor-Lewis食管癌切除术对食管癌患者而言是一种可行且安全的手术方式。
ANZ J Surg. 2016 Apr;86(4):274-9. doi: 10.1111/ans.13161. Epub 2015 May 12.
6
Minimally invasive oesophagectomy in Wales.威尔士的微创食管切除术
Surgeon. 2016 Aug;14(4):196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2014.10.001. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
7
Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy at a single, high-volume centre.单中心大样本量研究:开放性与微创 Ivor Lewis 食管切除术的围手术期结局比较。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Sep;42(3):430-7. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs031. Epub 2012 Feb 15.
8
Does minimally invasive oesophagectomy provide a benefit in hospital length of stay when compared with open oesophagectomy?与开放性食管切除术相比,微创食管切除术在缩短住院时间方面是否具有优势?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 Mar;22(3):360-7. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv339. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
9
Minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.微创食管切除术与开放食管切除术治疗可切除食管癌的Meta分析
World J Surg Oncol. 2016 Dec 8;14(1):304. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-1062-7.
10
Robot-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy: a 3-year single-center experience.机器人辅助经食管裂孔食管切除术:3 年单中心经验。
Dis Esophagus. 2013 Feb-Mar;26(2):159-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01325.x. Epub 2012 Mar 6.