• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤性损伤手术干预量表:创伤性脑损伤的临床工具。

The Surgical Intervention for Traumatic Injury Scale: A Clinical Tool for Traumatic Brain Injury.

机构信息

Nationwide Children's Hospital, Division of Neurosurgery, Columbus, Ohio.

The Ohio State University, Department of Neurosurgery, Columbus, Ohio.

出版信息

West J Emerg Med. 2019 Jul;20(4):578-584. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2019.4.41802. Epub 2019 Jun 18.

DOI:10.5811/westjem.2019.4.41802
PMID:31316696
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6625684/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There is no widely used method for communicating the possible need for surgical intervention in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). This study describes a scoring system designed to communicate the potential need for surgical decompression in TBI patients. The scoring system, named the Surgical Intervention for Traumatic Injury (SITI), was designed to be objective and easy to use.

METHODS

The SITI scale uses radiographic and clinical findings, including the Glasgow Coma Scale Score, pupil examination, and findings noted on computed tomography. To examine the scale, we used the patient database for the Progesterone for the Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury III (ProTECT III) trial, and retrospectively applied the SITI scale to these patients.

RESULTS

Of the 871 patients reviewed, 164 (18.8%) underwent craniotomy or craniectomy, and 707 (81.2%) were treated nonoperatively. The mean SITI score was 5.1 for patients who underwent surgery and 2.5 for patients treated nonoperatively (P<0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.887.

CONCLUSION

The SITI scale was designed to be a simple, objective, clinical decision tool regarding the potential need for surgical decompression after TBI. Application of the SITI scale to the ProTECT III database demonstrated that a score of 3 or more was well associated with a perceived need for surgical decompression. These results further demonstrate the potential utility of the SITI scale in clinical practice.

摘要

简介

目前尚无广泛应用的方法来沟通外伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者是否需要手术干预。本研究描述了一种评分系统,旨在沟通 TBI 患者手术减压的潜在需求。该评分系统命名为外伤性损伤手术干预评分(SITI),旨在客观且易于使用。

方法

SITI 量表使用影像学和临床发现,包括格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分、瞳孔检查和计算机断层扫描发现。为了检验该评分系统,我们使用了 Progesterone for the Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury III(ProTECT III)试验的患者数据库,并对这些患者回顾性地应用了 SITI 评分系统。

结果

在回顾的 871 名患者中,164 名(18.8%)接受了开颅手术或颅骨切除术,707 名(81.2%)接受了非手术治疗。手术组的平均 SITI 评分为 5.1,非手术组为 2.5(P<0.001)。受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.887。

结论

SITI 评分系统旨在成为一种简单、客观的临床决策工具,用于评估 TBI 后是否需要手术减压。将 SITI 评分系统应用于 ProTECT III 数据库表明,评分≥3 分与手术减压的需求密切相关。这些结果进一步证明了 SITI 评分系统在临床实践中的潜在应用价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74ad/6625684/d9d8f00e7116/wjem-20-578-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74ad/6625684/ca3439c47270/wjem-20-578-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74ad/6625684/103f5cf591c0/wjem-20-578-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74ad/6625684/d9d8f00e7116/wjem-20-578-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74ad/6625684/ca3439c47270/wjem-20-578-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74ad/6625684/103f5cf591c0/wjem-20-578-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74ad/6625684/d9d8f00e7116/wjem-20-578-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The Surgical Intervention for Traumatic Injury Scale: A Clinical Tool for Traumatic Brain Injury.创伤性损伤手术干预量表:创伤性脑损伤的临床工具。
West J Emerg Med. 2019 Jul;20(4):578-584. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2019.4.41802. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
2
Validation of the Surgical Intervention for Traumatic Injury scale in the pediatric population.
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2020 Apr 10;26(1):92-97. doi: 10.3171/2020.2.PEDS19474. Print 2020 Jul 1.
3
A clinical scale to communicate surgical urgency for traumatic brain injury: A preliminary study.一种用于传达创伤性脑损伤手术紧迫性的临床量表:一项初步研究。
Surg Neurol Int. 2015 Jan 5;6:1. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.148541. eCollection 2015.
4
Preemptive craniectomy with craniotomy: what role in the management of severe traumatic brain injury?开颅术前颅骨切除术:在重度创伤性脑损伤的治疗中起什么作用?
J Trauma. 2009 Sep;67(3):531-6. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181b840e8.
5
Outcome following decompressive craniectomy in children with severe traumatic brain injury: a 10-year single-center experience with long-term follow up.儿童重型颅脑损伤减压性颅骨切除术后的结果:一项为期10年的单中心长期随访经验。
J Neurosurg. 2007 Apr;106(4 Suppl):268-75. doi: 10.3171/ped.2007.106.4.268.
6
Effects of Primary Decompressive Craniectomy on the Outcomes of Serious Traumatic Brain Injury with Mass Lesions, and Independent Predictors of Operation Decision.原发性减压性颅骨切除术对伴有占位性病变的严重创伤性脑损伤预后的影响及手术决策的独立预测因素。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Apr;148:e396-e405. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.12.158. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
7
Outcome after decompressive craniectomy for the treatment of severe traumatic brain injury.减压性颅骨切除术治疗重度创伤性脑损伤后的结果
J Trauma. 2008 Aug;65(2):380-5; discussion 385-6. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31817c50d4.
8
[Secondary decompression trepanation in progressive post-traumatic brain edema after primary decompressive craniotomy].[原发性减压性颅骨切除术后进行性创伤后脑水肿的二次减压钻孔术]
Unfallchirurg. 2003 Oct;106(10):815-25. doi: 10.1007/s00113-003-0663-0.
9
Surgical Treatment of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Switzerland: Results from a Multicenter Study.瑞士严重创伤性脑损伤的外科治疗:一项多中心研究的结果
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2016 Jan;77(1):36-45. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1563556. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
10
Management of severe traumatic brain injury by decompressive craniectomy.通过减压性颅骨切除术治疗严重创伤性脑损伤
Neurosurgery. 2000 Aug;47(2):315-22; discussion 322-3. doi: 10.1097/00006123-200008000-00009.

引用本文的文献

1
Emergency Cranial Neurosurgery: An Audit of Operative Burden in a Specialized Neurosurgical Center in a Resource-Limited Setting.急诊颅脑神经外科手术:资源有限环境下一家专业神经外科中心的手术负担审计
Cureus. 2025 Apr 3;17(4):e81668. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81668. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Association of initial assessment variables and mortality in severe pediatric traumatic brain injury.小儿重度创伤性脑损伤初始评估变量与死亡率的关联
World J Pediatr Surg. 2024 May 28;7(2):e000718. doi: 10.1136/wjps-2023-000718. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
A clinical scale to communicate surgical urgency for traumatic brain injury: A preliminary study.一种用于传达创伤性脑损伤手术紧迫性的临床量表:一项初步研究。
Surg Neurol Int. 2015 Jan 5;6:1. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.148541. eCollection 2015.
2
Very early administration of progesterone for acute traumatic brain injury.急性创伤性脑损伤早期给予黄体酮治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Dec 25;371(26):2457-66. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1404304. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
3
The Glasgow Coma Scale at 40 years: standing the test of time.格拉斯哥昏迷评分 40 年:经得起时间的考验。
Lancet Neurol. 2014 Aug;13(8):844-54. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70120-6.
4
Translational biomarker discovery in clinical metabolomics: an introductory tutorial.临床代谢组学中的转化生物标志物发现:入门教程
Metabolomics. 2013 Apr;9(2):280-299. doi: 10.1007/s11306-012-0482-9. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
5
Impact of secondary transfer on patients with severe traumatic brain injury.继发性转移对严重创伤性脑损伤患者的影响。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Feb;72(2):487-90. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318226ed59.
6
Management of penetrating brain injury.穿透性脑损伤的管理
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2011 Jul;4(3):395-402. doi: 10.4103/0974-2700.83871.
7
The subaxial cervical spine injury classification system: a novel approach to recognize the importance of morphology, neurology, and integrity of the disco-ligamentous complex.下颈椎损伤分类系统:一种认识椎间盘韧带复合体形态、神经学及完整性重要性的新方法。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Oct 1;32(21):2365-74. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181557b92.
8
Receiver-operating characteristic analysis for evaluating diagnostic tests and predictive models.用于评估诊断试验和预测模型的受试者工作特征分析。
Circulation. 2007 Feb 6;115(5):654-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.594929.
9
Surgical management of posterior fossa mass lesions.
Neurosurgery. 2006 Mar;58(3 Suppl):S47-55; discussion Si-iv. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000210366.36914.38.
10
Surgical management of depressed cranial fractures.颅骨凹陷性骨折的手术治疗
Neurosurgery. 2006 Mar;58(3 Suppl):S56-60; discussion Si-iv. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000210367.14043.0E.