• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发国家自动化内镜数据库:英国国家内镜数据库(NED)。

Development of a national automated endoscopy database: The United Kingdom National Endoscopy Database (NED).

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, North Tyneside General Hospital, North Shields, UK.

Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Royal College of Physicians, London, UK.

出版信息

United European Gastroenterol J. 2019 Jul;7(6):798-806. doi: 10.1177/2050640619841539. Epub 2019 Apr 2.

DOI:10.1177/2050640619841539
PMID:31316784
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6620868/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The National Endoscopy Database (NED) project commenced in 2013 under the auspices of the Joint Advisory Group. The aim is to upload endoscopy procedure data from all units across the United Kingdom to a centralised database. The database can be used to facilitate quality assurance, research and training in endoscopy.

OBJECTIVE

This article describes the development and implementation process of NED from its inception to date.

METHODS

NED utilises automated data uploading of a minimum dataset from local endoscopy reporting systems to a central national database via the internet. Currently all data are anonymised. Key performance indicators are presented to endoscopists and organisations on a web-based platform for quality assurance purposes.

RESULTS

As of October 2018, 295 endoscopy services out of a total of 529 known services in the UK (56%) are actively uploading to NED. Data from more than 400,000 endoscopic procedures have been uploaded.

CONCLUSION

UK-wide data collection from endoscopy units to a central database is feasible using an automated upload system. This has the potential to facilitate endoscopy quality assurance and research.

摘要

背景

国家内镜数据库(NED)项目于 2013 年在联合咨询小组的主持下启动。目的是将来自英国各地所有单位的内镜手术数据上传到一个集中的数据库。该数据库可用于促进内镜的质量保证、研究和培训。

目的

本文描述了 NED 从成立到现在的发展和实施过程。

方法

NED 利用自动化数据上传,从本地内镜报告系统将最小数据集通过互联网上传到中央国家数据库。目前所有数据均为匿名。关键绩效指标以网络为基础的平台呈现给内镜医生和机构,用于质量保证。

结果

截至 2018 年 10 月,英国共有 529 个已知服务机构,其中 295 个内镜服务机构(56%)正在积极向 NED 上传数据。已经上传了超过 40 万次内镜手术的数据。

结论

使用自动化上传系统从内镜单位向中央数据库进行全英范围的数据收集是可行的。这有可能促进内镜的质量保证和研究。

相似文献

1
Development of a national automated endoscopy database: The United Kingdom National Endoscopy Database (NED).开发国家自动化内镜数据库:英国国家内镜数据库(NED)。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2019 Jul;7(6):798-806. doi: 10.1177/2050640619841539. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
2
Impact of the National Endoscopy Database (NED) on colonoscopy withdrawal time: a tertiary centre experience.国家内镜数据库(NED)对结肠镜退镜时间的影响:一家三级中心的经验。
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2021 Jul;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2021-000699.
3
The National Endoscopy Database (NED) Automated Performance Reports to Improve Quality Outcomes Trial (APRIQOT) randomized controlled trial design.国家内镜数据库(NED)自动性能报告以改善质量结果试验(APRIQOT)随机对照试验设计。
Endosc Int Open. 2020 Nov;8(11):E1545-E1552. doi: 10.1055/a-1261-3151. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
4
UK key performance indicators and quality assurance standards for colonoscopy.英国结肠镜检查的关键绩效指标和质量保证标准。
Gut. 2016 Dec;65(12):1923-1929. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312044. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
5
UK endoscopy workload and workforce patterns: is there potential to increase capacity? A BSG analysis of the National Endoscopy Database.英国内镜检查工作量与劳动力模式:是否有增加服务能力的潜力?英国胃肠病学会对国家内镜检查数据库的分析。
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2022 Jun 20;14(2):103-110. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2022-102145. eCollection 2023.
6
Evaluation of a virtual endoscopy simulator for training in gastrointestinal endoscopy.用于胃肠道内窥镜检查培训的虚拟内窥镜模拟器评估
Endoscopy. 2002 Sep;34(9):698-702. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-33456.
7
Development and validation of a deep learning-based algorithm for colonoscopy quality assessment.基于深度学习的结肠镜检查质量评估算法的开发和验证。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Sep;36(9):6446-6455. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08993-y. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
8
The changing landscape of practice patterns regarding unsedated endoscopy and propofol use: a national Web survey.关于非镇静内镜检查和丙泊酚使用的实践模式的变化态势:一项全国性网络调查。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Jul;62(1):9-15. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(05)00518-3.
9
The time and financial impact of training fellows in endoscopy. CORI Research Project. Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative.培训内镜检查研究员的时间和财务影响。CORI研究项目。临床结果研究倡议。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2000 Nov;95(11):3129-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.03280.x.
10
The first 1000 patients on an internet-based colorectal neoplasia database across private and public medicine in Australia: development of a binational model for the Colorectal Surgical Society of Australia and New Zealand.澳大利亚互联网结直肠肿瘤数据库前 1000 例患者:澳大利亚和新西兰结直肠外科学会的中澳双边模型的建立。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Feb;57(2):167-73. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000041.

引用本文的文献

1
Testing the precautionary principle: a scoping review comparing potable tap and sterile water for irrigation in colonoscopy.检验预防原则:一项比较结肠镜检查中用于冲洗的饮用水和无菌水的范围综述。
Can J Surg. 2025 Jul 10;68(4):E281-E288. doi: 10.1503/cjs.012724. Print 2025 Jul-Aug.
2
Variation in Proximal Sessile Serrated Lesion Detection Rates During Non-screening Colonoscopies.非筛查性结肠镜检查期间近端无蒂锯齿状病变检出率的差异
Cureus. 2025 Apr 15;17(4):e82317. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82317. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Case-mix-adjusted mean number of polyps per 100 procedures: a new candidate gold standard colonoscopy key performance indicator.每100例手术的病例组合调整后息肉平均数量:一种新的候选结肠镜检查金标准关键绩效指标。
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2025 May 2;12(1):e001743. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2025-001743.
4
Assessment of the impact of power business intelligence on adenoma detection rate: a prospective observational trial.评估电力商业智能对腺瘤检出率的影响:一项前瞻性观察性试验。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 Apr 19;25(1):275. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-03894-z.
5
Sustained success in endoscopic performance demonstrated by the Irish National Endoscopy Quality Improvement Programme.爱尔兰国家内镜质量改进计划所展示的内镜操作持续成功。
Endosc Int Open. 2025 Feb 26;13:a25209965. doi: 10.1055/a-2520-9965. eCollection 2025.
6
Overview of a national endoscopy database: The Trans.IT database and its impact on data registration quality.全国内镜数据库概述:Trans.IT 数据库及其对数据登记质量的影响。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2024 Nov;12(9):1200-1210. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12669. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
7
Quantifying the cost savings and health impacts of improving colonoscopy quality: an economic evaluation.量化提高结肠镜检查质量所带来的成本节约和健康影响:一项经济评估。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2025 Jun 19;34(7):469-478. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016932.
8
Colonoscopic cancer detection rate: a new performance measure - is it FIT for purpose?结肠镜检查癌症检出率:一项新的性能指标——它是否适用于此目的?
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2023 Dec 9;15(3):198-202. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2023-102555. eCollection 2024 May.
9
Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy procedure volume trends, perioperative mortality, and malpractice claims: Population-based analysis.上消化道内镜检查手术量趋势、围手术期死亡率及医疗事故索赔:基于人群的分析
Endosc Int Open. 2024 Mar 18;12(3):E385-E393. doi: 10.1055/a-2265-8757. eCollection 2024 Mar.
10
Initiatives to increase colonoscopy capacity - is there an impact on polyp detection? A UK National Endoscopy Database analysis.增加结肠镜检查能力的举措 - 是否对息肉检出率有影响?英国国家内镜数据库分析。
Endoscopy. 2024 Apr;56(4):302-310. doi: 10.1055/a-2214-9840. Epub 2023 Nov 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Endoscopy in 2017: a national survey of practice in the UK.2017年英国内镜检查:全国实践调查
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2019 Jan;10(1):7-15. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2018-100970. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
2
Performance indicators in colonoscopy after certification for independent practice: outcomes and predictors of competence.结肠镜检查认证后独立执业的绩效指标:能力的结果和预测因素。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Mar;89(3):482-492.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.07.032. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
3
Design paper: Japan Endoscopy Database (JED): A prospective, large database project related to gastroenterological endoscopy in Japan.设计方案:日本内镜数据库(JED):与日本消化内镜相关的一项前瞻性大型数据库项目。
Dig Endosc. 2018 Jan;30(1):5-19. doi: 10.1111/den.12964. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
4
Development and roll out of the JETS e-portfolio: a web based electronic portfolio for endoscopists.JETS电子档案袋的开发与推广:一款面向内镜医师的基于网络的电子档案袋。
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2011 Jan;2(1):35-42. doi: 10.1136/fg.2010.003269. Epub 2010 Nov 20.
5
UK key performance indicators and quality assurance standards for colonoscopy.英国结肠镜检查的关键绩效指标和质量保证标准。
Gut. 2016 Dec;65(12):1923-1929. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312044. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
6
Audit and feedback interventions to improve endoscopist performance: Principles and effectiveness.提高内镜医师操作水平的审核与反馈干预措施:原则与效果
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2016 Jun;30(3):473-85. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2016.04.002. Epub 2016 Apr 16.
7
The learning curve to achieve satisfactory completion rates in upper GI endoscopy: an analysis of a national training database.上消化道内镜检查中达到满意完成率的学习曲线:全国培训数据库分析。
Gut. 2017 Jun;66(6):1022-1033. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310443. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
8
The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Quality Improvement Initiative: developing performance measures.欧洲胃肠道内镜学会质量改进倡议:制定绩效指标。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2016 Feb;4(1):30-41. doi: 10.1177/2050640615624631. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
9
Requirements and standards facilitating quality improvement for reporting systems in gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement.促进胃肠内镜报告系统质量改进的要求和标准:欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)立场声明。
Endoscopy. 2016 Mar;48(3):291-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-100186. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
10
The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Quality Improvement Initiative: developing performance measures.欧洲胃肠内镜学会质量改进倡议:制定绩效指标
Endoscopy. 2016 Jan;48(1):81-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1569580. Epub 2015 Dec 11.