• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非筛查性结肠镜检查期间近端无蒂锯齿状病变检出率的差异

Variation in Proximal Sessile Serrated Lesion Detection Rates During Non-screening Colonoscopies.

作者信息

Thoufeeq Mo, Mohanan Vikram, Nishad Nilanga, Toh Eu-Wing, Shiha Mohamed G

机构信息

Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Sheffield, GBR.

Gastroenterology, Kettering General Hospital, Kettering, GBR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 Apr 15;17(4):e82317. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82317. eCollection 2025 Apr.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.82317
PMID:40376347
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12080950/
Abstract

AIMS

Proximal sessile serrated lesions (PSSL) are increasingly recognized as significant precursors of interval colon cancer. We aimed to assess the PSSL detection rates during non-screening colonoscopies and whether there are associations between PSSL detection rate and the established colonoscopy key performance indicators (KPI).

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data of all non-screening colonoscopies performed by independent endoscopists at a large teaching hospital between June and December 2019. Data regarding endoscopists' KPIs, including polyp detection rate (PDR), cecal intubation rate (CIR), and colonoscopy withdrawal time (CWT), were retrieved from the national endoscopy database. SSL resected proximal to the splenic flexure were identified by an expert pathologist. Associations between PSSL detection rate and the different KPIs were assessed using Spearman's test.

RESULTS

A total of 2956 colonoscopies performed by 33 endoscopists were included. The mean PSSL detection rate was 0.7% (SD 1.5), the mean PDR was 37.1% (SD 17), the mean CIR was 91.3% (SD 6), and the mean CWT was nine minutes (SD 2). There was marked variability in PSSL detection rates between endoscopists (range 0 - 6.5%). PSSL detection rate positively correlated with CWT (r=0.34, p=0.04) but not with the other KPIs.

CONCLUSION

The wide variability in PSSL detection between endoscopists is concerning of high miss rates and despite achieving the national benchmarks for the established KPIs, many endoscopists still had low PSSL detection rates. Therefore, PSSL detection rate should be considered as an independent KPI.

摘要

目的

近端无蒂锯齿状病变(PSSL)越来越被认为是间隔期结肠癌的重要前体病变。我们旨在评估非筛查性结肠镜检查期间PSSL的检出率,以及PSSL检出率与既定结肠镜关键绩效指标(KPI)之间是否存在关联。

方法

我们回顾性收集了2019年6月至12月期间一家大型教学医院独立内镜医师进行的所有非筛查性结肠镜检查数据。从国家内镜数据库中检索有关内镜医师KPI的数据,包括息肉检出率(PDR)、盲肠插管率(CIR)和结肠镜检查退镜时间(CWT)。脾曲近端切除的SSL由一名专家病理学家进行识别。使用Spearman检验评估PSSL检出率与不同KPI之间的关联。

结果

纳入了33名内镜医师进行的总共2956例结肠镜检查。PSSL的平均检出率为0.7%(标准差1.5),平均PDR为37.1%(标准差17),平均CIR为91.3%(标准差6),平均CWT为9分钟(标准差2)。内镜医师之间的PSSL检出率存在显著差异(范围为0 - 6.5%)。PSSL检出率与CWT呈正相关(r = 0.34,p = 0.04),但与其他KPI无关。

结论

内镜医师之间PSSL检出率的广泛差异令人担忧漏诊率高,尽管达到了既定KPI的国家基准,但许多内镜医师的PSSL检出率仍然较低。因此,PSSL检出率应被视为一项独立的KPI。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/631f/12080950/5bcb270b67d6/cureus-0017-00000082317-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/631f/12080950/646723a09eb0/cureus-0017-00000082317-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/631f/12080950/5bcb270b67d6/cureus-0017-00000082317-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/631f/12080950/646723a09eb0/cureus-0017-00000082317-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/631f/12080950/5bcb270b67d6/cureus-0017-00000082317-i02.jpg

相似文献

1
Variation in Proximal Sessile Serrated Lesion Detection Rates During Non-screening Colonoscopies.非筛查性结肠镜检查期间近端无蒂锯齿状病变检出率的差异
Cureus. 2025 Apr 15;17(4):e82317. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82317. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.提供锯齿状息肉检出率基准数据:新罕布什尔结肠镜检查登记处的分析
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jun;85(6):1188-1194. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.01.020. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
3
The proximal serrated polyp detection rate is an easy-to-measure proxy for the detection rate of clinically relevant serrated polyps.近端锯齿状息肉检出率是临床相关锯齿状息肉检出率的一个易于测量的替代指标。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Nov;82(5):870-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.02.044. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
4
Adenoma and sessile serrated polyp detection rates: variation by patient sex and colonic segment but not specialty of the endoscopist.腺瘤和无蒂锯齿状息肉的检出率:因患者性别和结肠节段而异,但与内镜医师的专业无关。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Sep;57(9):1113-9. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000183.
5
Endoscopic detection of proximal serrated lesions and pathologic identification of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps vary on the basis of center.内镜对近端锯齿状病变的检测和无蒂锯齿状腺瘤/息肉的病理鉴定因中心而异。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Jul;12(7):1119-26. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.11.034. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
6
Prevalence and variable detection of proximal colon serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy.筛查结肠镜检查中近端结肠锯齿状息肉的流行情况和可变检测。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Jan;9(1):42-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2010.09.013. Epub 2010 Oct 1.
7
Improving sessile serrated adenoma detection rates with high definition colonoscopy: A retrospective study.高清结肠镜检查提高无蒂锯齿状腺瘤检出率:一项回顾性研究。
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Apr 16;14(4):226-234. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v14.i4.226.
8
Impact of the National Endoscopy Database (NED) on colonoscopy withdrawal time: a tertiary centre experience.国家内镜数据库(NED)对结肠镜退镜时间的影响:一家三级中心的经验。
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2021 Jul;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2021-000699.
9
Does the withdrawal time affect adenoma detection in non-screening colonoscopies?非筛查性结肠镜检查中,退镜时间是否会影响腺瘤的检出?
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2020 Jan;11(1):5-10. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2018-101134. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
10
Serrated polyp detection and risk of interval post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer: a population-based study.锯齿状息肉检测与结肠镜检查后结直肠癌间隔期风险:基于人群的研究。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Aug;7(8):747-754. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00090-5. Epub 2022 May 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of adenoma detection rate and proximal serrated polyp detection rate and their effect on post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer mortality in screening patients.筛查患者中腺瘤检出率与近端锯齿状息肉检出率的比较及其对结肠镜检查后结直肠癌死亡率的影响。
Endoscopy. 2023 May;55(5):434-441. doi: 10.1055/a-1974-9979. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
2
Serrated polyp detection and risk of interval post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer: a population-based study.锯齿状息肉检测与结肠镜检查后结直肠癌间隔期风险:基于人群的研究。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Aug;7(8):747-754. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00090-5. Epub 2022 May 9.
3
Clinically significant serrated polyp detection rates and risk for postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer: data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.
临床显著锯齿状息肉检出率及结肠镜检查后的结直肠癌风险:来自新罕布什尔州结肠镜检查登记处的数据。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Aug;96(2):310-317. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.03.001. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
4
Systematic review with meta-analysis: the prevalence of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers using the World Endoscopy Organization nomenclature.系统评价与荟萃分析:采用世界内镜组织命名法的结肠镜检查后结直肠癌的患病率。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Nov;54(10):1232-1242. doi: 10.1111/apt.16622. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
5
Incidence, mortality, survival, risk factor and screening of colorectal cancer: A comparison among China, Europe, and northern America.结直肠癌的发病率、死亡率、生存率、危险因素和筛查:中国、欧洲和北美之间的比较。
Cancer Lett. 2021 Dec 1;522:255-268. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2021.09.034. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
6
Higher adenoma detection, sessile serrated lesion detection and proximal sessile serrated lesion detection are associated with physician specialty and performance on Direct Observation of Procedural Skills.腺瘤检出率、无蒂锯齿状病变检出率和近端无蒂锯齿状病变检出率与医生专业和直接观察操作技能表现相关。
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2021 Jun;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2021-000677.
7
Sessile serrated lesion detection rates during average risk screening colonoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature.平均风险筛查结肠镜检查中无蒂锯齿状病变的检出率:对已发表文献的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Apr;9(4):E610-E620. doi: 10.1055/a-1352-4095. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
8
Colorectal Cancer Screening for the Serrated Pathway.锯齿状途径的结直肠癌筛查。
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2020 Jul;30(3):457-478. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2020.02.007. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
9
Causes of Post-Colonoscopy Colorectal Cancers Based on World Endoscopy Organization System of Analysis.基于世界内镜组织分析系统的结肠镜检查后结直肠癌病因。
Gastroenterology. 2020 Apr;158(5):1287-1299.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.12.031. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
10
The 2019 WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system.2019年世界卫生组织消化系统肿瘤分类。
Histopathology. 2020 Jan;76(2):182-188. doi: 10.1111/his.13975. Epub 2019 Nov 13.