• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Individualized assessment and treatment program (IATP) for cannabis use disorder: Randomized controlled trial with and without contingency management.个体化评估和治疗计划(IATP)治疗大麻使用障碍:有和没有条件管理的随机对照试验。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2020 Feb;34(1):40-51. doi: 10.1037/adb0000491. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
2
Momentary coping and marijuana use in treated adults: Exploring mechanisms of treatment.治疗成人中的瞬间应对和大麻使用:探索治疗机制。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2021 Apr;89(4):264-276. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000633.
3
Individualized assessment and treatment program for alcohol dependence: results of an initial study to train coping skills.个体化评估和酒精依赖治疗方案:培训应对技能的初步研究结果。
Addiction. 2009 Nov;104(11):1837-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02693.x. Epub 2009 Aug 27.
4
Individualized Assessment and Treatment Program (IATP) for alcohol use disorder: Comparison with conventional cognitive-behavioral treatment and examination of coping skills as a mediator of treatment.个体化评估和治疗计划(IATP)治疗酒精使用障碍:与传统认知行为治疗的比较及应对技能作为治疗中介的检验。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2024 Oct;92(10):711-726. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000907. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
5
Integrated cognitive-behavioral therapy for comorbid cannabis use and anxiety disorders: The impact of severity of cannabis use.针对大麻使用与焦虑症共病的综合认知行为疗法:大麻使用严重程度的影响。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2021 Jun;29(3):272-278. doi: 10.1037/pha0000456. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
6
Coping skills training and contingency management treatments for marijuana dependence: exploring mechanisms of behavior change.大麻依赖的应对技能训练和应急管理治疗:探索行为改变机制
Addiction. 2008 Apr;103(4):638-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02137.x.
7
Behavioral treatment for marijuana dependence: randomized trial of contingency management and self-efficacy enhancement.大麻依赖的行为治疗:应急管理和自我效能增强的随机试验。
Addict Behav. 2013 Mar;38(3):1764-75. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.08.011. Epub 2012 Aug 31.
8
Combining cognitive behavioral therapy and contingency management to enhance their effects in treating cannabis dependence: less can be more, more or less.将认知行为疗法和应急管理相结合,以增强它们在治疗大麻依赖方面的效果:少即是多,或多或少。
Addiction. 2012 Sep;107(9):1650-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03877.x. Epub 2012 May 8.
9
Clinic- and home-based contingency management plus parent training for adolescent cannabis use disorders.针对青少年大麻使用障碍的诊所及家庭应急管理加家长培训。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2015 Jun;54(6):445-53.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2015.02.009. Epub 2015 Feb 28.
10
Computer-assisted behavioral therapy and contingency management for cannabis use disorder.计算机辅助行为疗法和大麻使用障碍的应急管理
Psychol Addict Behav. 2015 Sep;29(3):501-11. doi: 10.1037/adb0000078. Epub 2015 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Disparities in Treatment Outcomes for Cannabis Use Disorder Among Adolescents.青少年大麻使用障碍治疗结果的差异
Pediatr Rep. 2025 Jul 10;17(4):74. doi: 10.3390/pediatric17040074.
2
Evolution of the substance use landscape: Implications for contingency management.物质使用情况的演变:对权变管理的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2025 Jan;58(1):36-55. doi: 10.1002/jaba.2911. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
3
The daily association between affect and alcohol use: A meta-analysis of individual participant data.情绪与饮酒行为的日常关联:一项基于个体参与者数据的荟萃分析。
Psychol Bull. 2023 Jan-Feb;149(1-2):1-24. doi: 10.1037/bul0000387.
4
Momentary coping and marijuana use in treated adults: Exploring mechanisms of treatment.治疗成人中的瞬间应对和大麻使用:探索治疗机制。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2021 Apr;89(4):264-276. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000633.

本文引用的文献

1
Age Differences in Daily and Nondaily Cannabis Use in the United States, 2002-2014.美国 2002-2014 年日常和非日常大麻使用的年龄差异。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2018 May;79(3):423-431. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2018.79.423.
2
Broad Coping Repertoire Mediates the Effect of the Combined Behavioral Intervention on Alcohol Outcomes in the COMBINE Study: An Application of Latent Class Mediation.广泛的应对策略在 COMBINE 研究中调节联合行为干预对酒精结果的影响:潜在类别中介分析的应用。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2018 Mar;79(2):199-207. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2018.79.199.
3
Follow-up treatment effects of contingency management and motivational interviewing on substance use: A meta-analysis.应急管理和动机性访谈对物质使用的后续治疗效果:一项荟萃分析。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2017 Jun;31(4):403-414. doi: 10.1037/adb0000277. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
4
A review of the literature on contingency management in the treatment of substance use disorders, 2009-2014.2009 - 2014年关于物质使用障碍治疗中应急管理的文献综述。
Prev Med. 2016 Nov;92:36-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.08.008. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
5
Multilevel Modeling of Individual and Group Level Mediated Effects.个体水平和群体水平中介效应的多层次建模。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2001 Apr 1;36(2):249-77. doi: 10.1207/S15327906MBR3602_06.
6
Prevalence of Marijuana Use Disorders in the United States Between 2001-2002 and 2012-2013.2001 - 2002年至2012 - 2013年期间美国大麻使用障碍的患病率。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2015 Dec;72(12):1235-42. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.1858.
7
Computer-assisted behavioral therapy and contingency management for cannabis use disorder.计算机辅助行为疗法和大麻使用障碍的应急管理
Psychol Addict Behav. 2015 Sep;29(3):501-11. doi: 10.1037/adb0000078. Epub 2015 May 4.
8
Willpower versus "skillpower": Examining how self-efficacy works in treatment for marijuana dependence.意志力与“技能力”:探究自我效能在大麻依赖治疗中的作用机制
Psychol Addict Behav. 2015 Sep;29(3):532-40. doi: 10.1037/adb0000085. Epub 2015 May 4.
9
Behavioral treatment for marijuana dependence: randomized trial of contingency management and self-efficacy enhancement.大麻依赖的行为治疗:应急管理和自我效能增强的随机试验。
Addict Behav. 2013 Mar;38(3):1764-75. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.08.011. Epub 2012 Aug 31.
10
Validity of Timeline Follow-Back for self-reported use of cannabis and other illicit substances--systematic review and meta-analysis.时间线回溯法用于自我报告大麻和其他非法物质使用的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Addict Behav. 2012 Mar;37(3):225-33. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.11.025. Epub 2011 Nov 26.

个体化评估和治疗计划(IATP)治疗大麻使用障碍:有和没有条件管理的随机对照试验。

Individualized assessment and treatment program (IATP) for cannabis use disorder: Randomized controlled trial with and without contingency management.

机构信息

Division of Behavioral Sciences and Community Health, UConn Health.

Department of Psychiatry, UConn Health.

出版信息

Psychol Addict Behav. 2020 Feb;34(1):40-51. doi: 10.1037/adb0000491. Epub 2019 Jul 18.

DOI:10.1037/adb0000491
PMID:31318225
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6980271/
Abstract

This study tested a new approach to the treatment of cannabis use disorder (CUD). CUD is difficult to treat, and achieving abstinence is particularly difficult. The individualized assessment and treatment program (IATP) was intended to address this problem by providing a highly individualized approach to the training of coping skills most relevant for each individual. To do this, an experience sampling procedure was used prior to treatment to record patients' marijuana use behavior and associated thoughts, feelings, coping behaviors, and situations. This information was used by therapists to plan treatment that would address the specific strengths and weaknesses of each patient in drug-use situations. The present study tested IATP against a conventional combined motivational enhancement cognitive-behavioral treatment (MET-CBT), with or without the addition of contingency management (CM) for abstinence. The patients were 198 men and women randomly assigned to 1 of 4 nine-session treatment conditions: MET-CBT, MET-CBT-CM, IATP, or IATP-CM. Patients were assessed out to 14 months. Planned contrasts indicated that the IATP conditions yielded greater levels of abstinence than did the MET-CBT conditions. The addition of CM did not bolster the performance of IATP but did do so for MET-CBT. As expected, IATP lead to greater use of coping skills than did the MET-CBT conditions. However, coping skills use was not a significant predictor of outcome when other variables were in the same analyses. Self-efficacy was a robust predictor and mediator of outcome. We suggest that the IATP may act by enhancing self-efficacy. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

本研究测试了一种治疗大麻使用障碍(CUD)的新方法。CUD 很难治疗,并且特别难以实现戒除。个体化评估和治疗计划(IATP)旨在通过为每个个体提供最相关的应对技能培训的高度个体化方法来解决此问题。为此,在治疗前使用经验取样程序记录患者的大麻使用行为以及相关的想法、感受、应对行为和情况。治疗师使用这些信息来计划治疗,以解决每个患者在用药情况下的特定优势和劣势。本研究将 IATP 与常规的联合动机增强认知行为治疗(MET-CBT)进行了测试,后者或附加了戒除的强制性管理(CM)。患者被随机分配到 4 种为期 9 节的治疗条件之一:MET-CBT、MET-CBT-CM、IATP 或 IATP-CM。患者的评估时间长达 14 个月。计划的对比表明,IATP 条件比 MET-CBT 条件产生更高的戒除率。强制性管理的加入并未增强 IATP 的表现,但确实增强了 MET-CBT 的表现。正如预期的那样,IATP 导致了比 MET-CBT 条件更多地使用应对技能。但是,当其他变量在相同的分析中时,应对技能的使用并不是结果的重要预测因素。自我效能感是结果的有力预测因素和中介因素。我们认为,IATP 可能通过增强自我效能感来发挥作用。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。