Division of Behavioral Sciences and Community Health, UConn Health.
Department of Psychiatry, UConn Health.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2020 Feb;34(1):40-51. doi: 10.1037/adb0000491. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
This study tested a new approach to the treatment of cannabis use disorder (CUD). CUD is difficult to treat, and achieving abstinence is particularly difficult. The individualized assessment and treatment program (IATP) was intended to address this problem by providing a highly individualized approach to the training of coping skills most relevant for each individual. To do this, an experience sampling procedure was used prior to treatment to record patients' marijuana use behavior and associated thoughts, feelings, coping behaviors, and situations. This information was used by therapists to plan treatment that would address the specific strengths and weaknesses of each patient in drug-use situations. The present study tested IATP against a conventional combined motivational enhancement cognitive-behavioral treatment (MET-CBT), with or without the addition of contingency management (CM) for abstinence. The patients were 198 men and women randomly assigned to 1 of 4 nine-session treatment conditions: MET-CBT, MET-CBT-CM, IATP, or IATP-CM. Patients were assessed out to 14 months. Planned contrasts indicated that the IATP conditions yielded greater levels of abstinence than did the MET-CBT conditions. The addition of CM did not bolster the performance of IATP but did do so for MET-CBT. As expected, IATP lead to greater use of coping skills than did the MET-CBT conditions. However, coping skills use was not a significant predictor of outcome when other variables were in the same analyses. Self-efficacy was a robust predictor and mediator of outcome. We suggest that the IATP may act by enhancing self-efficacy. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
本研究测试了一种治疗大麻使用障碍(CUD)的新方法。CUD 很难治疗,并且特别难以实现戒除。个体化评估和治疗计划(IATP)旨在通过为每个个体提供最相关的应对技能培训的高度个体化方法来解决此问题。为此,在治疗前使用经验取样程序记录患者的大麻使用行为以及相关的想法、感受、应对行为和情况。治疗师使用这些信息来计划治疗,以解决每个患者在用药情况下的特定优势和劣势。本研究将 IATP 与常规的联合动机增强认知行为治疗(MET-CBT)进行了测试,后者或附加了戒除的强制性管理(CM)。患者被随机分配到 4 种为期 9 节的治疗条件之一:MET-CBT、MET-CBT-CM、IATP 或 IATP-CM。患者的评估时间长达 14 个月。计划的对比表明,IATP 条件比 MET-CBT 条件产生更高的戒除率。强制性管理的加入并未增强 IATP 的表现,但确实增强了 MET-CBT 的表现。正如预期的那样,IATP 导致了比 MET-CBT 条件更多地使用应对技能。但是,当其他变量在相同的分析中时,应对技能的使用并不是结果的重要预测因素。自我效能感是结果的有力预测因素和中介因素。我们认为,IATP 可能通过增强自我效能感来发挥作用。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。