Goodwin Shelby, Kirby Kimberly C, Raiff Bethany R
Department of Psychology, Rowan University, Glassboro, New Jersey, USA.
We The Village, Inc., New York, New York, USA.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2025 Jan;58(1):36-55. doi: 10.1002/jaba.2911. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
Contingency management (CM), which involves the delivery of incentives upon meeting behavioral goals, has the potential to improve substance use treatment outcomes. The intervention allows for flexibility through numerous modifiable components including changes to incentive magnitude and schedule, target behavior, and intervention structure. Unfortunately, numerous changes in the substance use landscape have occurred in the past 10 to 15 years: Substances are more potent, overdose risk has increased, new substances and methods of use have been introduced, and substance classes are increasingly being intentionally and unintentionally mixed. These developments potentially undermine CM outcomes. We explored recent substance use changes due to legislative, regulatory, social, and economic factors for four substance classes: stimulants, opioids, tobacco, and cannabis. We discuss potential adjustments to the modifiable components of CM for future research in response to these changes. By continually adapting to the shifting substance use landscape, CM can maintain optimal efficacy.
应急管理(CM)涉及在实现行为目标时给予奖励,它有可能改善物质使用治疗效果。该干预措施通过众多可修改的组成部分实现灵活性,包括奖励幅度和时间表的变化、目标行为以及干预结构。不幸的是,在过去10至15年里,物质使用领域发生了许多变化:物质效力增强、过量用药风险增加、新物质和使用方法出现,并且物质类别越来越多地被有意无意地混合使用。这些发展可能会破坏应急管理的效果。我们探讨了由于立法、监管、社会和经济因素导致的四种物质类别(兴奋剂、阿片类药物、烟草和大麻)近期的物质使用变化。我们讨论了针对这些变化,应急管理可修改组成部分在未来研究中的潜在调整。通过不断适应不断变化的物质使用情况,应急管理可以保持最佳效果。