• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肩评估与诊断的最小临床重要差异:系统评价。

Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Shoulder Outcome Measures and Diagnoses: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

From the Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee (DID); Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee (NBJ); and Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee (NBJ).

出版信息

Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Aug;98(8):671-676. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001169.

DOI:10.1097/PHM.0000000000001169
PMID:31318747
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6649681/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Patient-reported outcome scales determine response to treatment. The minimal clinically important difference of these scales is a measure of responsiveness: the smallest change in a score associated with a clinically important change to the patient. This study sought to summarize the literature on minimal clinically important difference for the most commonly reported shoulder outcome scales.

DESIGN

A literature search of PubMed and EMBASE databases identified 193 citations, 27 of which met the inclusion/exclusion criteria.

RESULTS

For rotator cuff tears, a minimal clinically important difference range of 9-26.9 was reported for American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, 8 or 10 for Constant, and 282.6-588.7 for the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index. For patients who underwent arthroplasty, a minimal clinically important difference range of 6.3-20.9 was reported for American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, 5.7-9.4 for Constant, and 14.1-20.6 for the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index. For proximal humeral fractures, a minimal clinically important difference range of 5.4-11.6 was reported for Constant and 8.1-13.0 for Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand.

CONCLUSIONS

A wide range of minimal clinically important difference values was reported for each patient population and instrument. In the future, a uniform outcome instrument and minimal clinically important difference will be useful to measure clinically meaningful change across practices and the spectrum of shoulder diagnoses.

摘要

目的

患者报告的结果量表可确定治疗反应。这些量表的最小临床重要差异是反应性的衡量标准:与患者临床重要变化相关的评分最小变化。本研究旨在总结最常报告的肩部结果量表的最小临床重要差异文献。

设计

对 PubMed 和 EMBASE 数据库进行文献检索,共确定了 193 条引文,其中 27 条符合纳入/排除标准。

结果

对于肩袖撕裂,美国肩肘外科医师协会(American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons)报告的最小临床重要差异范围为 9-26.9,常数(Constant)为 8 或 10,西部安大略省肩袖指数(Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index)为 282.6-588.7。对于接受关节置换术的患者,美国肩肘外科医师协会(American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons)报告的最小临床重要差异范围为 6.3-20.9,常数(Constant)为 5.7-9.4,肩痛和残疾指数(Shoulder Pain and Disability Index)为 14.1-20.6。对于肱骨近端骨折,常数(Constant)报告的最小临床重要差异范围为 5.4-11.6,手臂、肩部和手部残疾(Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand)为 8.1-13.0。

结论

每个患者人群和仪器的最小临床重要差异值范围都很广。未来,统一的结果仪器和最小临床重要差异将有助于衡量实践和肩部诊断范围内的临床有意义的变化。

相似文献

1
Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Shoulder Outcome Measures and Diagnoses: A Systematic Review.肩评估与诊断的最小临床重要差异:系统评价。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Aug;98(8):671-676. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001169.
2
Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for patient-reported shoulder outcomes.患者报告的肩部结局的最小临床重要差异(MCID)。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Jul;29(7):1484-1492. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.12.033. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
3
Minimal clinically important differences in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Simple Shoulder Test, and visual analog scale pain scores after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.关节镜肩袖修复术后美国肩肘外科医生评分、简易肩测试和视觉模拟评分的最小临床重要差异。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Jul;29(7):1406-1411. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.11.018. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
4
Determining the minimal clinically important difference for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Simple Shoulder Test, and visual analog scale (VAS) measuring pain after shoulder arthroplasty.确定美国肩肘外科医生评分、简易肩部测试以及用于测量肩关节置换术后疼痛的视觉模拟量表(VAS)的最小临床重要差异。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Jan;26(1):144-148. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
5
The Responsiveness of Patient- Reported Outcome Tools in Shoulder Surgery Is Dependent on the Underlying Pathological Condition.患者报告结局工具在肩部手术中的反应性取决于潜在的病理状况。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Jan;47(1):241-247. doi: 10.1177/0363546517749213. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
6
Establishing minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptomatic state after biceps tenodesis.建立二头肌肌腱固定术后的最小临床重要差异、显著临床获益和患者可接受的症状状态。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Apr;28(4):639-647. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.09.025. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
7
Validity and Responsiveness of the Single Alpha-numeric Evaluation for Shoulder Patients.用于肩部患者的单字母评估的有效性和反应性。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Dec;46(14):3480-3485. doi: 10.1177/0363546518807924. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
8
Minimal clinically important differences in ASES and simple shoulder test scores after nonoperative treatment of rotator cuff disease.在保守治疗肩袖疾病后,ASES 和简单肩部测试评分的最小临床重要差异。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Feb;92(2):296-303. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01296.
9
Clinical outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for elective indications versus acute 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.择期指征下反式全肩关节置换术与急性 3 部分和 4 部分肱骨近端骨折的临床疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Jan;31(1):e14-e21. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.07.014. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
10
Quantifying success after total shoulder arthroplasty: the minimal clinically important difference.全肩关节置换术后疗效的量化评估:最小临床重要差异。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Feb;27(2):298-305. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.09.013. Epub 2017 Nov 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Medicaid Patients Have Similar Functional Patient Outcomes but Lower Mental Health Scores Than Patients With Private Insurance Following Rotator Cuff Repair.与接受肩袖修复术的私人保险患者相比,医疗补助患者的功能预后相似,但心理健康评分较低。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2025 Apr 14;7(3):101148. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101148. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Scapular dyskinesis-based exercise therapy versus multimodal physical therapy for subacromial impingement syndrome in young overhead athletes with scapular dyskinesis: a randomized controlled trial.基于肩胛运动障碍的运动疗法与多模式物理疗法治疗伴有肩胛运动障碍的年轻过头运动运动员肩峰下撞击综合征:一项随机对照试验
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2025 Jul 16;17(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s13102-025-01254-8.
3
Acromioclavicular Reconstruction Using the Lockdown Technique: A Case Series and Systematic Review.使用锁定技术的肩锁关节重建:病例系列与系统评价
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 7;14(12):4046. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124046.
4
Return to Sport After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.反式肩关节置换术后重返运动:一项系统评价
Sports Health. 2025 Jun 19:19417381251343083. doi: 10.1177/19417381251343083.
5
Predictors of functional outcome after extra-articular scapular fracture stabilization with Brodsky approach.采用布罗茨基方法进行关节外肩胛骨骨折固定术后功能预后的预测因素
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Jun 19;35(1):257. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04355-9.
6
The smallest worthwhile effect on pain and function for rotator cuff repair surgery: a benefit-harm trade-off study.肩袖修复手术对疼痛和功能产生的最小有价值影响:一项利弊权衡研究。
Trials. 2025 Jun 12;26(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08902-x.
7
Greater socioeconomic deprivation predicts worse functional status two years after orthopaedic surgery, but not magnitude of change from baseline.社会经济剥夺程度越高,预示着骨科手术后两年的功能状态越差,但与基线相比的变化幅度无关。
J Orthop. 2025 Mar 15;70:33-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2025.03.022. eCollection 2025 Dec.
8
Beyond statistical significance: Embracing minimal clinically important difference for better patient care.超越统计学意义:接受最小临床重要差异以提供更好的患者护理。
World J Methodol. 2025 Mar 20;15(1):97814. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v15.i1.97814.
9
Effectiveness of sub-acromial injections in rotator cuff injuries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.肩峰下注射治疗肩袖损伤的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Orthop. 2025 Feb 18;16(2):102856. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i2.102856.
10
Collagen Injections for Rotator Cuff Diseases: A Systematic Review.用于肩袖疾病的胶原蛋白注射:一项系统评价
Clin Pract. 2025 Jan 28;15(2):28. doi: 10.3390/clinpract15020028.

本文引用的文献

1
Establishing minimally important differences for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index in patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears.确立全层肩袖撕裂患者的美国肩肘外科医生评分和西部Ontario 肩袖指数的最小临床重要差异。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 May;27(5):e160-e166. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.10.042. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
2
Minimal clinically important differences in Rowe and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index scores after arthroscopic repair of anterior shoulder instability.关节镜修复肩前不稳定后 Rowe 和 Western Ontario 肩不稳定指数评分的最小临床重要差异。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Apr;27(4):579-584. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.10.032. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
3
Quantifying success after total shoulder arthroplasty: the minimal clinically important difference.全肩关节置换术后疗效的量化评估:最小临床重要差异。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Feb;27(2):298-305. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.09.013. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
4
The development and validation of a questionnaire for rotator cuff disorders: The Functional Shoulder Score.肩袖疾病问卷的开发与验证:功能肩部评分
Shoulder Elbow. 2015 Oct;7(4):256-67. doi: 10.1177/1758573215578589. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
5
Determining the minimal clinically important difference for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Simple Shoulder Test, and visual analog scale (VAS) measuring pain after shoulder arthroplasty.确定美国肩肘外科医生评分、简易肩部测试以及用于测量肩关节置换术后疼痛的视觉模拟量表(VAS)的最小临床重要差异。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Jan;26(1):144-148. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
6
The Shoulder Function Index (SFInX): evaluation of its measurement properties in people recovering from a proximal humeral fracture.肩部功能指数(SFInX):对肱骨近端骨折康复患者测量属性的评估
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Jul 18;17:295. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1138-0.
7
What Change in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score Represents a Clinically Important Change After Shoulder Arthroplasty?美国肩肘外科医生评分的何种变化代表着肩关节置换术后具有临床意义的变化?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Dec;474(12):2672-2681. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4968-z. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
8
Preoperative patient-reported scores can predict postoperative outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty.术前患者报告的评分可以预测肩关节置换术后的结果。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Jun;25(6):913-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.01.029. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
9
The minimal clinically important difference for function and strength in patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty.接受反肩关节置换术患者功能和力量方面的最小临床重要差异。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Feb;25(2):262-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.07.020. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
10
Reliability and validity of shoulder function outcome measures in people with a proximal humeral fracture.肱骨近端骨折患者肩部功能评估指标的可靠性与有效性
Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(13):1072-9. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2013.829529. Epub 2013 Sep 3.