• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经导管主动脉瓣置换术后院内死亡率的机器学习预测模型。

Machine Learning Prediction Models for In-Hospital Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Puerto Rico School of Medicine, San Juan, Puerto Rico.

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

出版信息

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jul 22;12(14):1328-1338. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.06.013.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2019.06.013
PMID:31320027
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6650265/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to develop and compare an array of machine learning methods to predict in-hospital mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in the United States.

BACKGROUND

Existing risk prediction tools for in-hospital complications in patients undergoing TAVR have been designed using statistical modeling approaches and have certain limitations.

METHODS

Patient data were obtained from the National Inpatient Sample database from 2012 to 2015. The data were randomly divided into a development cohort (n = 7,615) and a validation cohort (n = 3,268). Logistic regression, artificial neural network, naive Bayes, and random forest machine learning algorithms were applied to obtain in-hospital mortality prediction models.

RESULTS

A total of 10,883 TAVRs were analyzed in our study. The overall in-hospital mortality was 3.6%. Overall, prediction models' performance measured by area under the curve were good (>0.80). The best model was obtained by logistic regression (area under the curve: 0.92; 95% confidence interval: 0.89 to 0.95). Most obtained models plateaued after introducing 10 variables. Acute kidney injury was the main predictor of in-hospital mortality ranked with the highest mean importance in all the models. The National Inpatient Sample TAVR score showed the best discrimination among available TAVR prediction scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Machine learning methods can generate robust models to predict in-hospital mortality for TAVR. The National Inpatient Sample TAVR score should be considered for prognosis and shared decision making in TAVR patients.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在开发并比较一系列机器学习方法,以预测美国经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后的院内死亡率。

背景

现有的 TAVR 患者院内并发症风险预测工具是使用统计建模方法设计的,存在一定的局限性。

方法

患者数据来自 2012 年至 2015 年的全国住院患者样本数据库。数据随机分为开发队列(n=7615)和验证队列(n=3268)。应用逻辑回归、人工神经网络、朴素贝叶斯和随机森林机器学习算法获得院内死亡率预测模型。

结果

本研究共分析了 10883 例 TAVR。总体院内死亡率为 3.6%。总体而言,通过曲线下面积衡量的预测模型性能良好(>0.80)。逻辑回归获得的模型最佳(曲线下面积:0.92;95%置信区间:0.89 至 0.95)。大多数获得的模型在引入 10 个变量后趋于平稳。急性肾损伤是所有模型中预测院内死亡率的主要指标,其平均重要性最高。全国住院患者样本 TAVR 评分在现有 TAVR 预测评分中具有最佳的区分度。

结论

机器学习方法可以生成稳健的模型来预测 TAVR 的院内死亡率。全国住院患者样本 TAVR 评分应在 TAVR 患者的预后和共同决策中考虑。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a920/6650265/481b2db4ab17/nihms-1531761-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a920/6650265/d79be58b1c79/nihms-1531761-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a920/6650265/16c87140009c/nihms-1531761-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a920/6650265/3508120ddfe6/nihms-1531761-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a920/6650265/481b2db4ab17/nihms-1531761-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a920/6650265/d79be58b1c79/nihms-1531761-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a920/6650265/16c87140009c/nihms-1531761-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a920/6650265/3508120ddfe6/nihms-1531761-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a920/6650265/481b2db4ab17/nihms-1531761-f0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Machine Learning Prediction Models for In-Hospital Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后院内死亡率的机器学习预测模型。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jul 22;12(14):1328-1338. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.06.013.
2
Inclusion of Functional Status Measures in the Risk Adjustment of 30-Day Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Report From the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology TVT Registry.在经导管主动脉瓣置换术后 30 天死亡率的风险调整中纳入功能状态测量:来自胸外科医师学会/美国心脏病学会经导管主动脉瓣置换术登记处的报告。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Mar 26;11(6):581-589. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.01.242.
3
Predicting Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: External Validation of the Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry Model.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后死亡率预测:经导管瓣膜治疗登记模型的外部验证。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Nov;10(11). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005481.
4
Association of Chronic Kidney Disease With In-Hospital Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.慢性肾脏病与经导管主动脉瓣置换术住院结局的相关性。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Oct 23;10(20):2050-2060. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.07.044.
5
Hospital outcomes of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in female in the United States.美国女性经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的医院治疗结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Mar 1;91(4):813-819. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27362. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
6
Modifiable Predictors of In-Hospital Mortality in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者住院期间死亡率的可改变预测因素。
Am J Med Sci. 2018 Aug;356(2):135-140. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2018.04.008. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
7
In-hospital outcomes of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement for nonagenarians.非高龄患者行经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的院内转归比较。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr 1;93(5):989-995. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28050. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
8
Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄的时间趋势和结局。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Sep 23;12(18):1811-1822. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.06.037.
9
Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Trends in Utilization and Propensity-Matched Analysis of In-Hospital Outcomes.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与冠状动脉旁路移植术后患者的外科主动脉瓣置换术:利用趋势和院内结局的倾向匹配分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Apr;11(4):e006179. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.006179.
10
Utilization and outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the United States shortly after device approval.在美国,经导管主动脉瓣置换术在设备获批后不久的应用情况及治疗效果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Nov 1;90(5):830-838. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27018. Epub 2017 Mar 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Harnessing Artificial Intelligence in Interventional Cardiology: A Systematic Review of Current Applications.介入心脏病学中人工智能的应用:当前应用的系统评价
Cureus. 2025 Jul 7;17(7):e87494. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87494. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Artificial Intelligence in Risk Stratification and Outcome Prediction for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.人工智能在经导管主动脉瓣置换术风险分层和结果预测中的应用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Pers Med. 2025 Jul 11;15(7):302. doi: 10.3390/jpm15070302.
3
Risk factors and predictive models for post-operative moderate-to-severe mitral regurgitation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a machine learning approach.

本文引用的文献

1
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Balloon-Expandable Valve in Low-Risk Patients.经皮球囊扩张式主动脉瓣置换术治疗低危患者。
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1695-1705. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1814052. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
2
Long-Term Durability of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Prostheses.经导管主动脉瓣置换术的长期耐久性。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Feb 12;73(5):537-545. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.078.
3
Development of a Risk Score Based on Aortic Calcification to Predict 1-Year Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
经导管主动脉瓣置换术后发生中重度二尖瓣反流的危险因素及预测模型:一种机器学习方法
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 May 10;25(1):361. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04759-9.
4
Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for Innovation in Interventional Cardiovascular Care.利用人工智能推动介入性心血管护理创新。
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2025 Mar 18;4(3Part B):102562. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2025.102562. eCollection 2025 Mar.
5
Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Imaging and Interventional Cardiology: Emerging Trends and Clinical Implications.心血管成像与介入心脏病学中的人工智能:新兴趋势与临床意义。
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2025 Mar 18;4(3Part B):102558. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102558. eCollection 2025 Mar.
6
Artificial intelligence in cardiovascular procedures: a bibliometric and visual analysis study.心血管手术中的人工智能:一项文献计量与可视化分析研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Feb 28;87(4):2187-2203. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003112. eCollection 2025 Apr.
7
Multidisciplinary clinician perceptions on utility of a machine learning tool (ALERT) to predict 6-month mortality and improve end-of-life outcomes for advanced cancer patients.多学科临床医生对一种机器学习工具(ALERT)在预测晚期癌症患者6个月死亡率及改善临终结局方面的效用的看法。
Cancer Med. 2025 Mar;14(5):e70137. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70137.
8
The role of artificial intelligence in aortic valve stenosis: a bibliometric analysis.人工智能在主动脉瓣狭窄中的作用:一项文献计量分析。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Feb 12;12:1521464. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1521464. eCollection 2025.
9
Predictors of complications and extended length of stay following percutaneous transluminal renal artery angioplasty.经皮腔内肾动脉血管成形术后并发症及延长住院时间的预测因素。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Dec 27;103(52):e41017. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041017.
10
Artificial intelligence in heart valve disease: diagnosis, innovation and treatment. A state-of-the-art review.人工智能在心脏瓣膜疾病中的应用:诊断、创新与治疗。一篇最新综述。
Br J Cardiol. 2024 Aug 6;31(3):031. doi: 10.5837/bjc.2024.031. eCollection 2024.
基于主动脉钙化的风险评分模型预测经导管主动脉瓣置换术后 1 年死亡率。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Jan;12(1):123-132. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.03.018. Epub 2018 May 16.
4
Temporal Trends and Factors Associated With Prolonged Length of Stay in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者住院时间延长的时间趋势及相关因素
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Jul 15;122(2):185-191. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.03.365. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
5
Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Trends in Utilization and Propensity-Matched Analysis of In-Hospital Outcomes.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与冠状动脉旁路移植术后患者的外科主动脉瓣置换术:利用趋势和院内结局的倾向匹配分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Apr;11(4):e006179. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.006179.
6
Machine learning in cardiovascular medicine: are we there yet?机器学习在心血管医学中的应用:我们是否已经实现?
Heart. 2018 Jul;104(14):1156-1164. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311198. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
7
Novel United Kingdom prognostic model for 30-day mortality following transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后 30 天死亡率的新型英国预后模型。
Heart. 2018 Jul;104(13):1109-1116. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312489. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
8
Association of Chronic Kidney Disease With In-Hospital Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.慢性肾脏病与经导管主动脉瓣置换术住院结局的相关性。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Oct 23;10(20):2050-2060. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.07.044.
9
Machine learning for prediction of 30-day mortality after ST elevation myocardial infraction: An Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Survey data mining study.机器学习预测 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死 30 天后的死亡率:一项急性冠状动脉综合征以色列调查数据挖掘研究。
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Nov 1;246:7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.05.067.
10
Latest-Generation Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Devices and Procedures.最新一代经导管主动脉瓣置换装置与手术
Can J Cardiol. 2017 Sep;33(9):1082-1090. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2017.03.012. Epub 2017 Mar 25.