University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Université Laval, Quebec, Canada.
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2019 Aug;222(7):1011-1020. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2019.06.011. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
Increasing the quantity of water available for consumption and hygiene is recognized to be among the most efficient interventions to reduce the risk of water-related infectious diseases in low and middle-income countries. Such impacts are often associated with water supply accessibility (e.g. distance or collection time) and used to justify investment in improving access.
To assess the relationship between the water source location and the quantity of water available in households from low and middle-income countries by identifying the effects of interventions aiming to improve access, and to compare the indicators and measures used to collect information.
We systematically searched seven databases (i.e. Cairn, Cochrane Library, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, Women's Studies International) along with grey literature for articles reporting indicators and measures of accessibility and quantity. We found 6492 records, of which 20 studies were retained that met the review's inclusion criteria.
Most studies were conducted in rural settings and provided suggestive findings to describe an inverse relationship between accessibility and quantity. Overall, a wide range of indicators and measures were used to assess water accessibility and quantity in the selected studies along with their association. The lack of consistency raised concerns regarding comparability and reliability of these methods.
The review findings support the hypothesis that the quantity of water available in households is a function of the source location, but the inconsistency in study outcomes highlights the need to further investigate the strength and effects of the relationship.
增加可用于消费和卫生的水量被认为是减少中低收入国家与水有关的传染病风险的最有效干预措施之一。这种影响通常与供水的可及性(例如距离或收集时间)有关,并被用来证明投资改善供水的合理性。
通过确定旨在改善获取途径的干预措施的效果,评估中低收入国家家庭的水源位置与水量之间的关系,并比较用于收集信息的指标和措施。
我们系统地在七个数据库(即 Cairn、Cochrane 图书馆、Embase、MEDLINE、PubMed、Web of Science、妇女研究国际)和灰色文献中搜索了报告获取途径和数量指标和措施的文章。我们找到了 6492 条记录,其中有 20 项研究符合审查的纳入标准。
大多数研究都是在农村地区进行的,提供了一些有启发性的发现,以描述获取途径和数量之间的反比关系。总体而言,在所选择的研究中,使用了广泛的指标和措施来评估水的获取途径和数量及其相关性。缺乏一致性引起了对这些方法的可比性和可靠性的关注。
审查结果支持了这样一种假设,即家庭可用水量是水源位置的函数,但研究结果的不一致性突出表明需要进一步调查这种关系的强度和影响。