• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Standardized Aspiration-First Approach for Thrombectomy to Increase Speed and Improve Recanalization Rates.抽吸优先的标准取栓方法可提高速度并改善再通率。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019 Aug;40(8):1335-1341. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6117. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
2
Outcomes of Stent Retriever versus Aspiration-First Thrombectomy in Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.支架取栓与抽吸优先血栓切除术治疗缺血性脑卒中的结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Nov;39(11):2070-2076. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5825. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
3
Efficacy of ADAPT with large-bore reperfusion catheter in anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke: a multicentric Italian experience.大口径再灌注导管 ADAPT 在急性前循环缺血性脑卒中中的疗效:多中心意大利经验。
Radiol Med. 2020 Jan;125(1):57-65. doi: 10.1007/s11547-019-01069-x. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
4
First-Line Sofia Aspiration Thrombectomy Approach within the Endovascular Treatment of Ischemic Stroke Multicentric Registry: Efficacy, Safety, and Predictive Factors of Success.多中心登记研究中血管内治疗缺血性卒中的一线 Sofia 抽吸血栓切除术方法:疗效、安全性和成功的预测因素。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019 Jun;40(6):1006-1012. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6074. Epub 2019 May 23.
5
Comparison of Aspiration versus Stent Retriever Thrombectomy as the Preferred Strategy for Patients with Acute Terminal Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.抽吸与支架取栓治疗急性终末颈内动脉闭塞患者的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020 Mar;41(3):469-476. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6414. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
6
First-line use of contact aspiration for thrombectomy versus a stent retriever for recanalization in acute cerebral infarction: The randomized ASTER study protocol.直接接触抽吸血栓切除术与支架取栓术用于急性脑梗死再通的一线治疗:随机 ASTER 研究方案。
Int J Stroke. 2018 Jan;13(1):87-95. doi: 10.1177/1747493017711948. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
7
Efficacy of Mechanical Thrombectomy Using Stent Retriever and Balloon-Guiding Catheter.使用支架取栓器和球囊引导导管进行机械取栓的疗效
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018 May;41(5):699-705. doi: 10.1007/s00270-018-1901-8. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
8
Modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2C/Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 3 Reperfusion Should Be the Aim of Mechanical Thrombectomy: Insights From the ASTER Trial (Contact Aspiration Versus Stent Retriever for Successful Revascularization).改良溶栓治疗脑梗死 2C/脑梗死 3 再灌注应是机械取栓的目标:来自 ASTER 试验(接触抽吸与支架取栓治疗成功再通的比较)的见解。
Stroke. 2018 May;49(5):1189-1196. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.020700. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
9
'Real-world' comparison of first-line direct aspiration and stent retriever mechanical thrombectomy for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke in the anterior circulation: a multicenter international retrospective study.真实世界中直接抽吸与支架取栓机械取栓治疗前循环急性缺血性脑卒中的一线治疗比较:一项多中心国际回顾性研究。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Oct;11(10):957-963. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014624. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
10
A direct aspiration first-pass technique vs stentriever thrombectomy in emergent large vessel intracranial occlusions.直接抽吸首过技术与支架取栓术治疗急性大血管颅内闭塞。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Feb;128(2):567-574. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.JNS161563. Epub 2017 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing efficacy and safety of direct aspiration versus stent retriever thrombectomy in acute basilar artery occlusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.直接抽吸与支架取栓术治疗急性基底动脉闭塞的疗效和安全性比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neuroradiol J. 2025 Aug 25:19714009251371266. doi: 10.1177/19714009251371266.
2
Unraveling the Enigma: Correlating Thrombus Histopathology With the Number of Passes in Mechanical Thrombectomy.解开谜团:将血栓组织病理学与机械取栓中的通过次数相关联
Cureus. 2025 Jan 26;17(1):e77994. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77994. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3
The ASCEND Technique-A Modified Direct Aspiration First Pass Technique for a Faster and Cost-effective Mechanical Thrombectomy.ASCEND技术——一种改良的直接抽吸首次通过技术,用于更快速且具成本效益的机械取栓术。
Clin Neuroradiol. 2025 Mar;35(1):173-184. doi: 10.1007/s00062-024-01469-1. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
4
Standardized approach to direct first pass aspiration technique for endovascular thrombectomy: Description and initial experience with CANADAPT.血管内血栓切除术直接首次通过抽吸技术的标准化方法:CANADAPT的描述与初步经验
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Feb 8:15910199241230360. doi: 10.1177/15910199241230360.
5
Standardised aspiration first approach reduces materials used and cost of thrombectomy procedure in anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stoke.标准化抽吸优先策略可减少前循环大血管闭塞性脑卒中取栓术中的材料使用和成本。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2023 Dec;29(6):648-654. doi: 10.1177/15910199221125101. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
6
Detection, Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke: Current and Future Perspectives.急性缺血性脑卒中的检测、诊断与治疗:现状与未来展望
Front Med Technol. 2022 Jun 24;4:748949. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2022.748949. eCollection 2022.
7
A Review of the Advancements in the Modelling of Acute Ischemic Stroke and Its Treatment.急性缺血性中风建模及其治疗进展综述
Front Med Technol. 2022 Jun 8;4:879074. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2022.879074. eCollection 2022.
8
Efficacy and safety of SOFIA aspiration catheter for mechanical thrombectomy via ADAPT and Solumbra echniques in acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.SOFIA 抽吸导管在急性缺血性脑卒中 ADAPT 和 Solumbra 技术机械取栓中的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Jun;30(3):326-335. doi: 10.1177/15910199221107438. Epub 2022 Jun 12.
9
Should the direct aspiration first pass technique be advocated over the stent-retriever technique for acute ischemic stroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis of 7692 patients.对于急性缺血性卒中,直接抽吸首次通过技术是否应优于支架取栓技术?一项对7692例患者的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Neurol Int. 2021 Dec 8;12:597. doi: 10.25259/SNI_903_2021. eCollection 2021.
10
Improving endovascular access to the target vessel for thrombus aspiration -Use of the wedge device to overcome anatomic hurdles.改善血栓抽吸术的血管内入路——使用楔形装置克服解剖学障碍。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2022 Apr;28(2):213-218. doi: 10.1177/15910199211024794. Epub 2021 Jun 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Drip and ship versus direct to endovascular thrombectomy: The impact of treatment times on transport decision-making.静脉滴注溶栓联合转运与直接血管内血栓切除术:治疗时间对转运决策的影响。
Eur Stroke J. 2018 Jun;3(2):126-135. doi: 10.1177/2396987318759362. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
2
Aspiration thrombectomy versus stent retriever thrombectomy as first-line approach for large vessel occlusion (COMPASS): a multicentre, randomised, open label, blinded outcome, non-inferiority trial.抽吸血栓切除术与支架取栓术作为血管内治疗大动脉闭塞(COMPASS)的一线治疗方法:一项多中心、随机、开放标签、盲法结局、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2019 Mar 9;393(10175):998-1008. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30297-1.
3
Preventing vessel perforations in endovascular thrombectomy: feasibility and safety of passing the clot with a microcatheter without microwire: the wireless microcatheter technique.在血管内血栓切除术预防血管穿孔:无微导丝使用微导管通过血栓的可行性和安全性:无线微导管技术。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Jul;11(7):653-658. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014267. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
4
Further Development of Combined Techniques Using Stent Retrievers, Aspiration Catheters and BGC : The PROTECT Technique.进一步发展支架取栓器、抽吸导管和 BGC 联合技术:PROTECT 技术。
Clin Neuroradiol. 2020 Mar;30(1):59-65. doi: 10.1007/s00062-018-0742-9. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
5
Efficacy and safety of direct aspiration versus stent-retriever for recanalization in acute cerebral infarction: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis.直接抽吸与取栓支架在急性脑梗死再通治疗中的疗效和安全性:一项遵循PRISMA标准的系统评价和荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Oct;97(41):e12770. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012770.
6
ADAPT technique with ACE68 and ACE64 reperfusion catheters in ischemic stroke treatment: results from the PROMISE study.ADAPT 技术联合 ACE68 和 ACE64 再灌注导管治疗缺血性脑卒中:来自 PROMISE 研究的结果。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Mar;11(3):226-231. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014122. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
7
Hemodynamic Changes May Indicate Vessel Wall Injury After Stent Retrieval Thrombectomy for Acute Stroke.血流动力学变化可能表明急性卒中支架取栓术后血管壁损伤。
J Neuroimaging. 2018 Jul;28(4):412-415. doi: 10.1111/jon.12513. Epub 2018 Apr 14.
8
A Direct Aspiration First Pass Technique vs Standard Endovascular Therapy for Acute Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.直接抽吸首过技术与标准血管内治疗急性脑卒中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurosurgery. 2018 Jul 1;83(1):19-28. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx386.
9
Effect of Endovascular Contact Aspiration vs Stent Retriever on Revascularization in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke and Large Vessel Occlusion: The ASTER Randomized Clinical Trial.血管内接触抽吸与支架取栓术对急性缺血性卒中合并大血管闭塞患者血管再通的影响:ASTER随机临床试验
JAMA. 2017 Aug 1;318(5):443-452. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.9644.
10
Maximizing First-Pass Complete Reperfusion with SAVE.利用SAVE实现首次通过完全再灌注最大化。
Clin Neuroradiol. 2018 Sep;28(3):327-338. doi: 10.1007/s00062-017-0566-z. Epub 2017 Feb 13.

抽吸优先的标准取栓方法可提高速度并改善再通率。

A Standardized Aspiration-First Approach for Thrombectomy to Increase Speed and Improve Recanalization Rates.

机构信息

From the Interventional Neuroradiology Service (D.O., E.G., S.P., P.B., M.S., A.O., S.L., J.T.), Department of Radiology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

From the Interventional Neuroradiology Service (D.O., E.G., S.P., P.B., M.S., A.O., S.L., J.T.), Department of Radiology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

出版信息

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019 Aug;40(8):1335-1341. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6117. Epub 2019 Jul 18.

DOI:10.3174/ajnr.A6117
PMID:31320463
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7048489/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Direct aspiration is a recognized technique for revascularization in large-vessel ischemic strokes. There is ongoing debate regarding its efficacy compared with stent retrievers. Every delay in achieving revascularization and a decrease in reperfusion rates reduces the likelihood of patients achieving functional independence. We propose a standardized setup technique for aspiration-first for all anterior circulation thrombectomy procedures for increasing speed and recanalization rates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed 127 consecutive patients treated by a standardized approach to thrombectomy with an intention to perform aspiration-first compared with 127 consecutive patients treated with a stent retriever-first approach. Key time metrics evaluated included groin to first angiogram, first angiogram to reperfusion, groin to first reperfusion, and length of the procedure. The degree of successful recanalization (TICI 2b-3) and the number of passes were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

In 127 patients who underwent the standardized technique, the median time from groin puncture to first reperfusion was 18 minutes compared with 26 minutes ( < .001). The duration of the procedure was shorter compared with the stent retriever group (26 minutes in the aspiration first group versus 47 minutes, < .001) and required fewer passes (mean, 2.4 versus 3.1; < .05). A higher proportion of patients had a TICI score of 2b-3 in the aspiration-first group compared with stent retriever group (96.1% versus 85.8%, < .005).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study highlights the increasing speed and recanalization rates achieved with fewer passes in a standardized approach to thrombectomy with an intention to attempt aspiration-first. Any attempt to reduce revascularization time and increase successful recanalization should be used.

摘要

背景与目的

直接抽吸是治疗大血管缺血性卒中再通的一种公认技术。目前,关于其与支架取栓器相比的疗效仍存在争议。每延迟一次再通和降低一次再灌注率,都会降低患者实现功能独立的可能性。我们提出了一种标准化的抽吸优先的抽吸技术,以提高速度和再通率。

材料与方法

我们分析了 127 例采用标准化方法进行取栓术的连续患者,这些患者的治疗意图是先进行抽吸,而 127 例连续患者采用支架取栓器优先的方法进行治疗。评估的关键时间指标包括腹股沟穿刺至首次血管造影、首次血管造影至再灌注、腹股沟至首次再灌注以及手术时间。比较两组患者的再通程度(TICI 2b-3)和通过次数。

结果

在 127 例接受标准化技术的患者中,从腹股沟穿刺到首次再灌注的中位数时间为 18 分钟,而 26 分钟(<0.001)。与支架取栓组相比,该组的手术时间更短(抽吸优先组 26 分钟,而支架取栓组 47 分钟,<0.001),通过次数更少(平均 2.4 次与 3.1 次,<0.05)。抽吸优先组的 TICI 评分 2b-3 的患者比例高于支架取栓组(96.1%比 85.8%,<0.005)。

结论

我们的研究强调了在标准化取栓术治疗中,采用抽吸优先的方法可以更快地实现再通和更高的再通率,同时通过次数更少。任何旨在缩短再通时间和增加成功再通的尝试都应该被采用。