Paneroni Mara, Vogiatzis Ioannis, Belli Stefano, Savio Gloria, Visca Dina, Zampogna Elisabetta, Aliani Maria, Carolis Vito De, Maniscalco Mauro, Simonelli Carla, Vitacca Michele
Institute Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Respiratory Rehabilitation of the Istitute of Lumezzane (BS), 25065 Lumezzane (BS), Itally.
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University Newcastle NE1 8ST, UK.
J Clin Med. 2019 Jul 18;8(7):1052. doi: 10.3390/jcm8071052.
Patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are unable to exercise at high intensities for sufficiently long periods of time to obtain true physiological training effects. It therefore appears sensible to increase training duration at sub-maximal exercise intensities to optimize the benefit of exercise training. We compared the effects on exercise tolerance of two endurance cycloergometer submaximal exercise protocols with different cumulative training loads (one (G1) versus two (G2) daily 40 min training sessions) both implemented over 20 consecutive days in 149 patients with COPD (forced expiratory volume at first second (FEV): 39% predicted) admitted to an inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program. Patients in G2 exhibited greater improvement ( = 0.011) in submaximal endurance time (from 258 (197) to 741 (662) sec) compared to G1 (from 303 (237) to 530 (555) sec). Clinically meaningful improvements in health-related quality of life, 6MWT, and chronic dyspnea were not different between groups. Doubling the volume of endurance training is feasible and can lead to an additional benefit on exercise tolerance. Future studies may investigate the applicability and benefits of this training strategy in the outpatient or community-based pulmonary rehabilitation settings to amplify the benefits of exercise interventions.
重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者无法长时间进行高强度运动以获得真正的生理训练效果。因此,在次最大运动强度下增加训练时长以优化运动训练的益处似乎是合理的。我们比较了两种累积训练负荷不同的耐力自行车测力计次最大运动方案(一种(G1)为每日一次40分钟训练,另一种(G2)为每日两次40分钟训练)对运动耐力的影响,这两种方案均在149例COPD患者(第一秒用力呼气量(FEV):预测值的39%)中连续实施20天,这些患者均入住住院肺部康复项目。与G1组(从303(237)秒增至530(555)秒)相比,G2组患者的次最大耐力时间有更大改善(=0.011)(从258(197)秒增至741(662)秒)。两组之间在与健康相关的生活质量、6分钟步行试验(6MWT)和慢性呼吸困难方面具有临床意义的改善并无差异。将耐力训练量翻倍是可行的,并且可以给运动耐力带来额外益处。未来的研究可以调查这种训练策略在门诊或社区肺部康复环境中的适用性和益处,以扩大运动干预的益处。