Ponsonby A L, Dwyer T, Gibbons L E, Cochrane J A, Wang Y G
Menzies Centre for Population Health Research, University of Tasmania, Australia.
N Engl J Med. 1993 Aug 5;329(6):377-82. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199308053290601.
In several studies the sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) has been significantly associated with sleeping in the prone position. It is not known how the prone position increases the risk of SIDS.
We analyzed data from a case-control study (58 infants with SIDS and 120 control infants) and a prospective cohort study (22 infants with SIDS and 213 control infants) in Tasmania. Interactions were examined in matched analyses with a multiplicative model of interaction.
In the case-control study, SIDS was significantly associated with sleeping in the prone position, as compared with other positions (unadjusted odds ratio, 4.5; 95 percent confidence interval, 2.1 to 9.6). The strength of this association was increased among infants who slept on natural-fiber mattresses (P = 0.05), infants who were swaddled (P = 0.09), infants who slept in heated rooms (P = 0.006), and infants who had had a recent illness (P = 0.02). These variables had no significant effect on infants who did not sleep in the prone position. A history of recent illness was significantly associated with SIDS among infants who slept prone (odds ratio, 5.7; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.8 to 19) but not among infants who slept in other positions (odds ratio, 0.83). In the cohort study, the risk of SIDS was greater among infants who slept prone on natural-fiber mattresses (odds ratio, 6.6; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.3 to 33) than among infants who slept prone on other types of mattresses (odds ratio, 1.8).
When infants sleep prone, the elevated risk of SIDS is increased by each of four factors: the use of natural-fiber mattresses, swaddling, recent illness, and the use of heating in bedrooms.
在多项研究中,婴儿猝死综合征(SIDS)与俯卧位睡眠显著相关。目前尚不清楚俯卧位如何增加SIDS的风险。
我们分析了塔斯马尼亚一项病例对照研究(58例SIDS婴儿和120例对照婴儿)和一项前瞻性队列研究(22例SIDS婴儿和213例对照婴儿)的数据。在匹配分析中采用交互作用的乘法模型来检验交互作用。
在病例对照研究中,与其他睡眠姿势相比,俯卧位睡眠与SIDS显著相关(未调整的优势比为4.5;95%置信区间为2.1至9.6)。在使用天然纤维床垫的婴儿(P = 0.05)、被包裹的婴儿(P = 0.09)、在温暖房间睡眠的婴儿(P = 0.006)以及近期患病的婴儿(P = 0.02)中,这种关联的强度增加。这些变量对非俯卧位睡眠的婴儿没有显著影响。近期患病史在俯卧位睡眠的婴儿中与SIDS显著相关(优势比为5.7;95%置信区间为1.8至19),但在其他睡眠姿势的婴儿中则不然(优势比为0.83)。在队列研究中,与睡在其他类型床垫上的俯卧位婴儿相比,睡在天然纤维床垫上的俯卧位婴儿发生SIDS的风险更高(优势比为6.6;95%置信区间为1.3至33)(睡在其他类型床垫上的俯卧位婴儿优势比为1.8)。
当婴儿俯卧位睡眠时,天然纤维床垫的使用、包裹、近期患病以及卧室使用暖气这四个因素中的每一个都会增加SIDS的风险。