• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心脏植入式电子设备感染的导线拔除:是否遗留导线对并发症发生率的影响无差异。

Lead extraction for cardiac implantable electronic device infection: comparable complication rates with or without abandoned leads.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology and Cardiopulmonary Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, Eindhoven, Netherlands.

出版信息

Europace. 2019 Sep 1;21(9):1378-1384. doi: 10.1093/europace/euz197.

DOI:10.1093/europace/euz197
PMID:31324910
Abstract

AIMS

Abandoned leads are often linked to complications during lead extraction, prompting pre-emptive extraction if leads become non-functional. We examined their influence on complications when extracted for device-related infection.

METHODS AND RESULTS

All patients undergoing lead extraction for device-related infection from 2006 to 2017 in our hospital were included. The primary endpoint was major complications. Out of 500 patients, 141 had abandoned leads, of whom 75% had only one abandoned lead. Median cumulative implant times were 24.2 (interquartile range 15.6-38.2) and 11.6 (5.6-17.4), respectively years with or without abandoned leads. All leads were extracted only with a femoral approach in 50.4% of patients. Mechanical rotational tools were introduced in 2014 and used in 22.2% of cases and replacing laser sheaths that were used in 5% of patients. Major complications occurred in 0.7% of patients with abandoned leads compared with 1.7% of patients with only active leads (P = 0.679). Failure to completely remove all leads was 14.9% and 6.4%, respectively with or without abandoned leads (P = 0.003), and clinical failure was 6.4% and 2.2% (P = 0.028), respectively. Procedural failure dropped to 9.2% and 5.7% (P = 0.37), respectively after the introduction of mechanical rotational tools. The only independent predictor of procedural and clinical failure in multivariate analysis was the cumulative implant duration.

CONCLUSION

Despite longer implant times, patients with abandoned leads did not have more major complications during lead extraction. Therefore, preventive extraction of non-functional leads to avoid complications at a later stage is not warranted.

摘要

目的

废弃导联常与导联拔除过程中的并发症相关,因此如果导联功能丧失,应预防性拔除。我们研究了在因器械相关感染而拔除这些导联时,它们对并发症的影响。

方法和结果

纳入我院 2006 年至 2017 年间因器械相关感染而行导联拔除的所有患者。主要终点为主要并发症。500 例患者中,141 例有废弃导联,其中 75%仅有 1 条废弃导联。有或无废弃导联的患者中位累计植入时间分别为 24.2(15.6-38.2)和 11.6(5.6-17.4)年。50.4%的患者仅经股静脉入路拔除所有导联,22.2%的患者采用机械旋转工具,5%的患者采用替代激光鞘。废弃导联组有 0.7%的患者发生主要并发症,而仅有活性导联的患者为 1.7%(P=0.679)。有或无废弃导联的患者中,未能完全拔除所有导联的比例分别为 14.9%和 6.4%(P=0.003),临床失败的比例分别为 6.4%和 2.2%(P=0.028)。采用机械旋转工具后,程序失败分别降至 9.2%和 5.7%(P=0.37)。多变量分析中,程序和临床失败的唯一独立预测因素是累计植入时间。

结论

尽管植入时间较长,但废弃导联患者在拔除导联时并未发生更多的主要并发症。因此,为避免后期并发症而预防性拔除功能丧失的导联并无必要。

相似文献

1
Lead extraction for cardiac implantable electronic device infection: comparable complication rates with or without abandoned leads.心脏植入式电子设备感染的导线拔除:是否遗留导线对并发症发生率的影响无差异。
Europace. 2019 Sep 1;21(9):1378-1384. doi: 10.1093/europace/euz197.
2
Procedural outcomes associated with transvenous lead extraction in patients with abandoned leads: an ESC-EHRA ELECTRa (European Lead Extraction ConTRolled) Registry Sub-Analysis.与废弃导线经静脉导线拔除术相关的操作结果:ESC-EHRA ELECTRa(欧洲导线拔除对照)注册研究的亚组分析。
Europace. 2019 Apr 1;21(4):645-654. doi: 10.1093/europace/euy307.
3
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections: Added Complexity and Suboptimal Outcomes With Previously Abandoned Leads.心脏植入式电子设备感染:先前废弃的导联增加了复杂性和不理想的结果。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Jan;3(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2016.06.009. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
4
Procedural outcomes and long-term survival associated with lead extraction in patients with abandoned leads.废弃导线拔除术患者的操作结果和长期生存与导线有关。
Heart Rhythm. 2018 Jun;15(6):855-859. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.01.018. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
5
Outcomes of transvenous lead extraction of very old leads using bidirectional rotational mechanical sheaths: Results of a multicentre study.使用双向旋转机械鞘管经静脉取出极旧导线的结果:一项多中心研究的结果
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023 Mar;34(3):728-737. doi: 10.1111/jce.15767. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
6
Comparison of outcomes in infected cardiovascular implantable electronic devices between complete, partial, and failed lead removal: an ESC-EHRA-EORP ELECTRa (European Lead Extraction ConTrolled) registry.比较完全、部分和失败的导线移除的感染性心血管植入电子设备的结局:ESC-EHRA-EORP ELECTRa(欧洲导线拔除控制)注册研究。
Europace. 2019 Dec 1;21(12):1876-1889. doi: 10.1093/europace/euz269.
7
The valuable interaction among cardiac surgeon and electrophysiologist for transvenous rotational mechanical lead extraction.心外科医师与电生理学家在经静脉旋转机械导线拔除术中的有价值的互动。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2022 Jan;45(1):92-102. doi: 10.1111/pace.14396. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
8
Impact of Abandoned Leads on Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Infections: A Propensity Matched Analysis of MEDIC (Multicenter Electrophysiologic Device Infection Cohort).废弃电极导线对心血管植入式电子设备感染的影响:MEDIC(多中心电生理装置感染队列)的倾向性匹配分析。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 Feb;4(2):201-208. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.09.178. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
9
Transvenous lead extraction after heart transplantation: How to avoid abandoned lead fragments.心脏移植后经静脉导线拔除:如何避免导线碎片残留。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Apr;31(4):854-859. doi: 10.1111/jce.14393. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
10
Twenty-year experience of transvenous lead extraction at a single centre.单中心经静脉导线拔除术的20年经验。
Europace. 2014 Sep;16(9):1350-5. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut424. Epub 2014 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Procedural outcomes of transvenous lead extraction in patients with abandoned leads: experience from a large single centre.废弃导线患者经静脉导线拔除的手术结果:来自大型单中心的经验
Europace. 2025 Aug 4;27(8). doi: 10.1093/europace/euaf109.