Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong.
Shenzhen Key Laboratory on Fertility Regulation, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Mar;55(3):303-309. doi: 10.1002/uog.20402. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
To compare the proportion of women achieving a desired ovarian response following ovarian stimulation when gonadotropin dosing was determined based on antral follicle count (AFC) vs serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) level, in women undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF) using the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol.
This was a randomized double-blind trial carried out in a university-affiliated assisted reproduction unit. A total of 200 women undergoing their first IVF cycle using the GnRH-antagonist protocol between April 2016 and February 2018 were randomized to determination of gonadotropin dosing based on either AFC or serum AMH level measured in the pretreatment cycle 1 month before the IVF cycle. Patients underwent IVF as per our center's standard protocol. The proportion of subjects achieving a desired ovarian response, defined as retrieval of six to 14 oocytes, was compared between the two study arms. Subgroup analysis of patients with baseline AFC > 5 and those with baseline AFC ≤ 5 was performed. Concordance in AFC and AMH categorization between the pretreatment cycle and the ovarian-stimulation cycle was assessed using Cohen's kappa (κ).
There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients achieving a desired ovarian response between the AFC (54%) and AMH (49%) groups (P = 0.479). The median number of oocytes retrieved was nine vs seven (P = 0.070), and the median follicular output rate was 0.54 vs 0.55 (P = 0.764) in the AFC and AMH groups, respectively. Similar findings were observed on subgroup analysis of subjects with AFC ≤ 5 and AFC > 5 at the start of ovarian stimulation (P > 0.05 for all comparisons). There was moderate concordance between AFC and AMH measured in the pretreatment cycle and the stimulation cycle (κ = 0.478 and 0.587, respectively).
The proportion of women achieving a desired ovarian response following ovarian stimulation using the GnRH-antagonist protocol is similar when the gonadotropin-dosing algorithm used is based on AFC or serum AMH level. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
比较在 GnRH 拮抗剂方案中进行体外受精(IVF)时,基于窦卵泡计数(AFC)与血清抗苗勒管激素(AMH)水平确定促性腺激素剂量时,女性促排卵后获得理想卵巢反应的比例。
这是一项在大学附属辅助生殖单位进行的随机双盲试验。2016 年 4 月至 2018 年 2 月期间,200 名接受 GnRH 拮抗剂方案进行首次 IVF 周期的女性被随机分为两组,一组根据预处理周期(IVF 周期前 1 个月)1 个月时测量的 AFC 确定促性腺激素剂量,另一组根据血清 AMH 水平确定促性腺激素剂量。患者按照中心的标准方案进行 IVF。比较两组患者获得理想卵巢反应(定义为取卵 6-14 枚)的比例。对基础 AFC>5 和基础 AFC≤5 的患者进行亚组分析。使用 Cohen's kappa(κ)评估预处理周期和卵巢刺激周期之间 AFC 和 AMH 分类的一致性。
AFC(54%)组和 AMH(49%)组获得理想卵巢反应的患者比例无显著差异(P=0.479)。AFC 组和 AMH 组的平均取卵数分别为 9 枚和 7 枚(P=0.070),卵泡输出率中位数分别为 0.54 和 0.55(P=0.764)。对开始卵巢刺激时 AFC≤5 和 AFC>5 的患者进行亚组分析,结果相似(所有比较 P>0.05)。预处理周期和刺激周期测量的 AFC 和 AMH 之间存在中度一致性(κ 值分别为 0.478 和 0.587)。
在 GnRH 拮抗剂方案中,当促性腺激素剂量算法基于 AFC 或血清 AMH 水平时,获得理想卵巢反应的女性比例相似。