Epperson Anna E, Lambin Eric F, Henriksen Lisa, Baiocchi Michael, Flora June A, Prochaska Judith J
Stanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
School of Earth, Energy & Environmental Sciences, Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Georges Lemaître Earth and Climate Research Centre, Earth and Life Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Prev Med. 2019 Sep;126:105782. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105782. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
Natural American Spirit (NAS) cigarettes feature a pro-environment marketing campaign on the packs. The NAS "Respect for the Earth" campaign is the first example of on-the-pack corporate social responsibility advertising. In a randomized survey design, we tested perceptions of NAS relative to other cigarette brands on harms to self, others, and the environment. Never (n = 421), former (n = 135), and current (n = 358) US adult smokers were recruited for an online survey from January through March 2018. All participants viewed packs of both NAS and Pall Mall. Participants were randomized to view NAS vs. Pall Mall and to pack color (blue, green, or yellow/orange), which was matched between brands. Survey items assessed perceptions of health risk of the cigarette brand to self, others, and the environment and corporate perceptions. Consistently on all measures, NAS cigarettes were rated as less harmful for oneself, others, and the environment relative to Pall Mall (p's < .001). Though Reynolds American owns both brands, participants rated the company behind NAS as more socially responsible than the company behind Pall Mall, F[1, 909] = 110.25, p < .001. The NAS advantage was significant irrespective of smoking status, pack color, and brand order, with findings stronger for current than never smokers. Pro-environmental marketing on NAS cigarette packs contributes to misperceptions that the product is safer for people and the environment than other cigarettes and made by a company that is more socially responsible. Stricter government regulations on the use of pro-environment terms in marketing that imply modified risk are needed.
美国天然烟草公司(NAS)的香烟在包装上开展了一场环保营销活动。NAS的“尊重地球”活动是包装上企业社会责任广告的首个范例。在一项随机调查设计中,我们测试了与其他香烟品牌相比,人们对NAS在危害自身、他人及环境方面的认知。2018年1月至3月,从不吸烟(n = 421)、曾经吸烟(n = 135)和当前吸烟(n = 358)的美国成年吸烟者被招募参加一项在线调查。所有参与者都查看了NAS和波迈香烟的包装。参与者被随机分组,分别查看NAS与波迈香烟以及包装颜色(蓝色、绿色或黄色/橙色),两个品牌的包装颜色相互匹配。调查项目评估了对香烟品牌对自身、他人及环境的健康风险认知以及对企业的认知。在所有衡量标准上,与波迈香烟相比,NAS香烟在对自身、他人及环境的危害方面得分更低(p值 < 0.001)。尽管雷诺美国公司拥有这两个品牌,但参与者认为NAS背后的公司比波迈背后的公司更具社会责任感,F[1, 909] = 110.25,p < 0.001。无论吸烟状况、包装颜色和品牌顺序如何,NAS的优势都很显著,当前吸烟者的调查结果比从不吸烟者的更强。NAS香烟包装上的环保营销导致了一种误解,即该产品对人和环境比其他香烟更安全,且是由一家更具社会责任感的公司生产的。政府需要对营销中使用暗示风险降低的环保术语实施更严格的监管。