Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Am Heart J. 2019 Sep;215:139-146. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.06.013. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
Many health systems have begun implementing electronic consultation programs. The clinical and financial impact of these programs in cardiology and the potential for more widespread adoption remains unknown.
To systematically review the current literature related to electronic consultation in cardiology.
Following the PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic review in August 2018 of English literature. We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases for studies related to electronic consultation in cardiology.
A total of 21 studies were included. Two of the studies were randomized controlled trials, 16 were quantitative studies with defined endpoints, and 3 were qualitative descriptions. Most studies were conducted in the United States and Canada. The available literature suggests cardiology e-consult programs can be implemented in different practice settings, have good patient and provider satisfaction, deliver greater and timelier access to outpatient cardiac care, and do so in a cost saving fashion. While studies suggest cardiology e-consultation is safe, there are no studies evaluating hard clinical outcomes.
Cardiology e-consults appear to be a promising tool for increasing access to outpatient cardiac care. Further investigation is required to evaluate the effects of cardiology electronic consultation on the quality of care.
Here we present the first systematic review of electronic consultation in cardiology. The available literature suggests cardiology e-consult programs can be implemented in different practice settings, have good patient and provider satisfaction, deliver greater and timelier access to outpatient cardiac care, and do so in a cost saving fashion. While studies suggest cardiology e-consultation is safe, there are no studies evaluating hard clinical outcomes. Overall, cardiology e-consults appear to be a promising tool for increasing access to outpatient cardiac care. Further investigation is required to evaluate the effects of cardiology electronic consultation on the quality of care.
系统回顾心脏病学电子咨询的现有文献。
按照 PRISMA 指南,我们于 2018 年 8 月对心脏病学电子咨询的英文文献进行了系统回顾。我们在 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆和 Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature(CINAHL)数据库中搜索了与心脏病学电子咨询相关的研究。
共纳入 21 项研究。其中 2 项为随机对照试验,16 项为具有明确终点的定量研究,3 项为定性描述。大多数研究在美国和加拿大进行。现有文献表明,心脏病学电子咨询项目可在不同的实践环境中实施,患者和医生满意度高,提供了更大、更及时的门诊心脏护理服务,并且具有成本效益。虽然研究表明心脏病学电子咨询是安全的,但没有研究评估硬临床结局。
心脏病学电子咨询似乎是增加门诊心脏护理服务可及性的有前途的工具。需要进一步研究评估心脏病电子咨询对护理质量的影响。