• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于医生间电子咨询的新型门诊肺病护理模式的成本效益分析。

Cost-Effectiveness of a New Outpatient Pulmonology Care Model Based on Physician-to-Physician Electronic Consultation.

机构信息

Servicio de Neumología, Complejo Hospitalario Clínico-Universitario de Santiago, Grupo Interdisciplinar de Investigación en Neumología, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

Servicio de Neumología, Complejo Hospitalario Clínico-Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

出版信息

Can Respir J. 2022 Oct 31;2022:2423272. doi: 10.1155/2022/2423272. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1155/2022/2423272
PMID:36353446
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9640234/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study assesses the impact of an electronic physician-to-physician consultation program on the waiting list and the costs of a Pulmonology Unit.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prepost intervention study was conducted after a new ambulatory pulmonary care protocol was implemented and the capacity of the unit was adopted. In the new model, physicians at all levels of healthcare send electronic consultations to specialists.

RESULTS

In the preintervention year (2019), the Unit of Pulmonology attended 7,055 consultations (466 e-consultations and 6,589 first face-to-face visits), which decreased to 6,157 (3,934 e-consultations and 2,223 first face-to-face visits; 12.7% reduction) in the postintervention year (all were e-consultations). The mean wait time for the first appointment was 25.7 days in 2019 versus 3.2 days in 2021 ( < 0.001). In total, 43.5% of cases were solved via physician-to-physiciane-consultation. A total of 2,223 patients needed a face-to-face visit, with a mean wait time of 7.5 days. The mean of patients in the waiting listing decreased from 450.8 in 2019 to 44.8 in 2021 (90% reduction). The annual time devoted to e-consultations and first face-to-face visits following an e-consultation diminished significantly after the intervention (1,724 hours versus 2,312.8; 25.4% reduction). Each query solved via e-consultation represented a saving of €652.8, resulting in a total annual saving of €827,062.

CONCLUSIONS

Physician-to-physiciane-consultations reduce waiting times, improve access of complex patients to specialty care, and ensure that cases are managed at the appropriate level. E-consultation reduces costs, which benefits both, society and the healthcare system.

摘要

简介

本研究评估了电子医生间咨询项目对肺病学单元的候诊名单和成本的影响。

材料和方法

在实施新的门诊肺部护理方案并采用该单位的能力后,进行了一项前后干预研究。在新模式中,各级医疗保健医生向专家发送电子咨询。

结果

在干预前一年(2019 年),肺病学单元共接待了 7055 次咨询(466 次电子咨询和 6589 次首次面对面就诊),在干预后一年减少到 6157 次(全部为电子咨询)(减少 12.7%)。2019 年首次预约的平均等待时间为 25.7 天,而 2021 年为 3.2 天(<0.001)。共有 43.5%的病例通过医生间电子咨询得到解决。共有 2223 名患者需要进行面对面就诊,平均等待时间为 7.5 天。候诊名单上的患者人数从 2019 年的 450.8 人减少到 2021 年的 44.8 人(减少 90%)。干预后,电子咨询后的电子咨询和首次面对面就诊的年度时间显著减少(1724 小时对 2312.8 小时;减少 25.4%)。通过电子咨询解决的每个查询都节省了 652.8 欧元,因此每年节省 827062 欧元。

结论

医生间电子咨询可缩短候诊时间,改善复杂患者获得专科护理的机会,并确保在适当的层面上管理病例。电子咨询可降低成本,使社会和医疗保健系统受益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c179/9640234/65c76f39940b/CRJ2022-2423272.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c179/9640234/a2472931277f/CRJ2022-2423272.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c179/9640234/ae111ba15de8/CRJ2022-2423272.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c179/9640234/853beec501b4/CRJ2022-2423272.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c179/9640234/65c76f39940b/CRJ2022-2423272.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c179/9640234/a2472931277f/CRJ2022-2423272.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c179/9640234/ae111ba15de8/CRJ2022-2423272.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c179/9640234/853beec501b4/CRJ2022-2423272.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c179/9640234/65c76f39940b/CRJ2022-2423272.004.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness of a New Outpatient Pulmonology Care Model Based on Physician-to-Physician Electronic Consultation.基于医生间电子咨询的新型门诊肺病护理模式的成本效益分析。
Can Respir J. 2022 Oct 31;2022:2423272. doi: 10.1155/2022/2423272. eCollection 2022.
2
Cost savings associated with electronic specialty consultations.与电子专科会诊相关的成本节约。
Am J Manag Care. 2021 Jan 1;27(1):e16-e23. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2021.88579.
3
Early e-consultation face-to-face conversions.早期电子咨询的面对面转化。
J Telemed Telecare. 2016 Jul;22(5):269-76. doi: 10.1177/1357633X15602634. Epub 2015 Sep 22.
4
Universal electronic consultation (e-consultation) program of a cardiology service. Long-term results.心脏病科服务的通用电子会诊项目。长期结果。
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2022 Feb;75(2):159-165. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2020.11.017. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
5
E-Consultation in Headache Medicine: A Quality Improvement Pilot Study.头痛医学中的电子咨询:一项质量改进试点研究。
Headache. 2020 Nov;60(10):2192-2201. doi: 10.1111/head.13981. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
6
Use of a primary care online consultation system, by whom, when and why: evaluation of a pilot observational study in 36 general practices in South West England.基层医疗在线咨询系统的使用情况、使用者、使用时间及原因:对英格兰西南部36家全科诊所的一项试点观察性研究的评估
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 22;7(11):e016901. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016901.
7
Keeping care connected: e-Consultation program improves access to nephrology care.保持护理连续性:电子咨询项目改善了肾病护理的可及性。
J Telemed Telecare. 2019 Apr;25(3):142-150. doi: 10.1177/1357633X17748350. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
8
An eConsultant versus a hospital-based outpatient consultation for general (internal) medicine: a costing analysis.电子咨询与基于医院的普通(内科)医学门诊咨询的成本分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 May 11;23(1):478. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09436-1.
9
Building access to specialist care through e-consultation.通过电子会诊建立获得专科护理的途径。
Open Med. 2013 Jan 8;7(1):e1-8. Print 2013.
10
Internal e-consultations in an integrated multispecialty practice: a retrospective review of use, content, and outcomes.综合多专科医疗实践中的内部电子会诊:对使用情况、内容及结果的回顾性分析
J Telemed Telecare. 2015 Apr;21(3):151-9. doi: 10.1177/1357633X15572204. Epub 2015 Feb 22.

本文引用的文献

1
[Longer-term results of the cardiology e-consult program in patients with heart failure].[心力衰竭患者心脏病电子咨询项目的长期结果]
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2022 Jan;75(1):93-95. doi: 10.1016/j.recesp.2021.06.011. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
2
Early experiences with cardiology electronic consults: A systematic review.心脏病学电子咨询的早期经验:系统评价。
Am Heart J. 2019 Sep;215:139-146. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.06.013. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
3
Electronic consults for improving specialty care access for veterans.电子咨询改善退伍军人获得专业护理的机会。
Am J Manag Care. 2019 May;25(5):250-253.
4
Outpatient Telemedicine Program in Vascular Surgery Reduces Patient Travel Time, Cost, and Environmental Pollutant Emissions.血管外科门诊远程医疗项目减少了患者的出行时间、成本和环境污染物排放。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2019 Aug;59:167-172. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.01.021. Epub 2019 May 9.
5
Financial and Temporal Advantages of Virtual Consultation in Veterans Requiring Specialty Care.虚拟会诊在需要专科护理的退伍军人中的财务和时间优势。
Mil Med. 2018 Jan 1;183(1-2):e71-e76. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usx006.
6
A cost-effectiveness analysis of cardiology eConsults for Medicaid patients.心脏病学电子咨询对医疗补助患者的成本效益分析。
Am J Manag Care. 2018 Jan 1;24(1):e9-e16.
7
New Model of Integration Between Primary Health Care and Specialized Cardiology Care.初级卫生保健与专科心脏病护理一体化的新模式
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2017 Oct;70(10):873-875. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
8
G7 Health Ministers' Kobe Communiqué.七国集团卫生部长神户公报。
Lancet. 2016 Sep 24;388(10051):1262-3. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31663-4. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
9
Use of e-mail for Parkinson's disease consultations: Are answers just a clic away?使用电子邮件进行帕金森病咨询:答案近在一键点击之间?
Neurologia (Engl Ed). 2018 Mar;33(2):107-111. doi: 10.1016/j.nrl.2016.05.020. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
10
Electronic Consultations to Improve the Primary Care-Specialty Care Interface for Cardiology in the Medically Underserved: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.电子咨询改善医疗资源不足地区心脏病学初级保健与专科医疗的衔接:一项整群随机对照试验。
Ann Fam Med. 2016 Mar;14(2):133-40. doi: 10.1370/afm.1869.