• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种语言模式下词汇学习的个体差异:手语学习、单词学习及其在听力正常但无手语基础的成年人中的关系。

Individual differences in lexical learning across two language modalities: Sign learning, word learning, and their relationship in hearing non-signing adults.

作者信息

Martinez David, Singleton Jenny L

机构信息

School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, United States of America.

School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, United States of America.

出版信息

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Jul;198:102892. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102892. Epub 2019 Jul 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102892
PMID:31326829
Abstract

A considerable amount of research has been devoted to understanding individual differences in lexical learning, however, the majority of this research has been conducted with spoken languages rather than signed languages and thus we know very little about the cognitive processes involved in sign learning or the extent to which lexical learning processes are specific to word learning. The present study was conducted to address this gap. Two-hundred thirty-six non-signing adults completed 25 tasks assessing word learning and sign learning (via associative learning paradigms) as well as modality-specific phonological short-term memory, working memory capacity, crystallized intelligence, and fluid intelligence. Latent variable analyses indicated that, when other variables were held constant, fluid intelligence was predictive of both word and sign learning, however, modality-specific phonological short-term memory factors were only predictive of lexical learning within modality-none of the other variables made significant independent contributions. It was further observed that sign and word learning were strongly correlated. Exploratory analyses revealed that all lexical learning tasks loaded onto a general factor, however, sign learning tasks loaded onto an additional specific factor. As such, this study provides insight into the cognitive components that are common to associative L2 lexical learning regardless of language modality and those that are unique to either signed or spoken languages. Results are further discussed in light of established and more recent theories of intelligence, short-term memory, and working memory.

摘要

大量研究致力于理解词汇学习中的个体差异,然而,这些研究大多针对口语语言而非手语进行,因此我们对手语学习所涉及的认知过程,或者词汇学习过程在多大程度上特定于单词学习了解甚少。本研究旨在填补这一空白。236名非手语使用者完成了25项任务,这些任务评估单词学习和手语学习(通过联想学习范式)以及特定模态的语音短期记忆、工作记忆容量、晶体智力和流体智力。潜在变量分析表明,当其他变量保持恒定时,流体智力可预测单词学习和手语学习,但特定模态的语音短期记忆因素仅能预测特定模态内的词汇学习,其他变量均未做出显著的独立贡献。进一步观察发现,手语学习和单词学习密切相关。探索性分析表明,所有词汇学习任务都加载到一个一般因素上,而手语学习任务则加载到一个额外的特定因素上。因此,本研究深入探讨了联想性二语词汇学习中,无论语言模态如何都共有的认知成分,以及手语或口语所特有的认知成分。我们将根据已有的以及最新的智力、短期记忆和工作记忆理论,进一步讨论研究结果。

相似文献

1
Individual differences in lexical learning across two language modalities: Sign learning, word learning, and their relationship in hearing non-signing adults.两种语言模式下词汇学习的个体差异:手语学习、单词学习及其在听力正常但无手语基础的成年人中的关系。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Jul;198:102892. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102892. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
2
Characterizing language production across modalities.跨模态语言生成的特点。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2024 Feb-Mar;41(1-2):1-17. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2024.2315823. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
3
The Road to Language Learning Is Not Entirely Iconic: Iconicity, Neighborhood Density, and Frequency Facilitate Acquisition of Sign Language.语言学习之路并非完全具有象似性:象似性、邻域密度和频率促进手语习得。
Psychol Sci. 2017 Jul;28(7):979-987. doi: 10.1177/0956797617700498. Epub 2017 May 30.
4
Electrophysiological evidence for phonological priming in Spanish Sign Language lexical access.电生理学证据表明西班牙语手语词汇获取中存在语音启动现象。
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jun;50(7):1335-46. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.02.018. Epub 2012 Mar 1.
5
Visual and linguistic components of short-term memory: Generalized Neural Model (GNM) for spoken and sign languages.视觉和语言成分的短期记忆:口语和手语的广义神经模型 (GNM)。
Cortex. 2019 Mar;112:69-79. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.05.020. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
6
Spoken Language Activation Alters Subsequent Sign Language Activation in L2 Learners of American Sign Language.口语激活会改变美国手语第二语言学习者随后的手语激活情况。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2017 Feb;46(1):211-225. doi: 10.1007/s10936-016-9432-4.
7
Articulatory Suppression Effects on Short-term Memory of Signed Digits and Lexical Items in Hearing Bimodal-Bilingual Adults.发音抑制对听力正常的双模式双语成年人手语数字和词汇短期记忆的影响。
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2016 Oct;21(4):362-72. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enw048. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
8
The relation between working memory and language comprehension in signers and speakers.手语使用者和口语使用者的工作记忆与语言理解之间的关系。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2017 Jun;177:69-77. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.04.014. Epub 2017 May 5.
9
On the temporal dynamics of sign production: An ERP study in Catalan Sign Language (LSC).关于手势语产生的时间动态:加泰罗尼亚手语(LSC)的一项事件相关电位研究。
Brain Res. 2015 Jun 3;1609:40-53. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.03.013. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
10
The Effect of Presentation Mode and Production Type on Word Memory for Hearing Impaired Signers.呈现方式和产出类型对听力受损手语者单词记忆的影响
J Am Acad Audiol. 2018 Nov/Dec;29(10):875-884. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17030.

引用本文的文献

1
Scoring story recall for individual differences research: Central details, peripheral details, and automated scoring.为个体差异研究评分故事回忆:中心细节、边缘细节和自动评分。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec;56(8):8362-8378. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02480-7. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
2
Language aptitude in the visuospatial modality: L2 British Sign Language acquisition and cognitive skills in British Sign Language-English interpreting students.视觉空间模态中的语言能力:英国手语 - 英语口译专业学生的第二语言英国手语习得与认知技能
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 14;13:932370. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.932370. eCollection 2022.