Hoang Phuong, Gerber Priscilla F, Reynolds Paul, McMillan Mary, Gray Peter, Walkden-Brown Stephen W
Animal Science, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2351, Australia.
Faculty of 'Chan Nuoi Thu Y', Tay Nguyen University, 567 Le Duan Street, Buon Ma Thuot City, DakLak Province, Vietnam.
Aust Vet J. 2019 Sep;97(9):323-332. doi: 10.1111/avj.12841. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
Haemorrhagic enteritis virus (HEV) causes clinical haemorrhagic enteritis in young poults and/or subclinical immunosuppression which is often associated with colibacillosis. This disease is controlled with live vaccines worldwide, however, importation of HEV vaccines or cells that support HEV propagation are not permitted in Australia. A major experiment in isolators was conducted to test the safety and efficacy of a putative HEV vaccine. The study had a factorial design with four factors namely vaccination age (28 and 42 days of age), vaccine dose (0, 10 , 10 , 10 genomic copies of HEV vaccine), challenge with HEV (yes, no) and vaccination-challenge interval (7, 21 or 42 days). A total of 315 poults were used providing 6-8 birds per treatment combination. Turkey growth rate, mortality, pathological findings, anti-HEV antibodies and viral load were examined. Vaccination lead to significant increases in anti HEV antibody over the following 2-4 weeks. Overall, vaccination with 10 and 10 was protective against increase in relative splenic weight and splenic viral load in challenged birds. Clinical haemorrhagic enteritis was not induced by any treatment but there was an increased incidence of airsacculitis in groups receiving either HEV vaccine or challenge virus compared to the negative control birds (25.8-29.3% vs. 9.4%, P < 0.05). Growth rate, mortality and relative bursal weight were unaffected by vaccination. This laboratory level study indicates that the putative vaccine is safe and likely to be efficacious, but may cause elevated levels of airsacculitis. These findings require confirmation in larger scale field trials.
出血性肠炎病毒(HEV)可导致幼火鸡出现临床出血性肠炎和/或亚临床免疫抑制,后者常与大肠杆菌病相关。在全球范围内,这种疾病通过活疫苗进行控制,然而,澳大利亚不允许进口HEV疫苗或支持HEV繁殖的细胞。在隔离器中进行了一项主要实验,以测试一种假定的HEV疫苗的安全性和有效性。该研究采用析因设计,有四个因素,即接种年龄(28日龄和42日龄)、疫苗剂量(0、10⁴、10⁵、10⁶个HEV疫苗基因组拷贝)、用HEV攻毒(是、否)以及接种-攻毒间隔(7、21或42天)。总共使用了315只火鸡,每个处理组合提供6 - 8只鸟。检测了火鸡的生长速度、死亡率、病理结果、抗HEV抗体和病毒载量。接种疫苗在接下来的2 - 4周内导致抗HEV抗体显著增加。总体而言,接种10⁵和10⁶剂量疫苗可保护受攻毒鸟类的相对脾脏重量和脾脏病毒载量不增加。任何处理均未诱发临床出血性肠炎,但与阴性对照鸟相比,接受HEV疫苗或攻毒病毒的组中气囊炎的发病率有所增加(25.8 - 29.3%对9.4%,P < 0.05)。生长速度、死亡率和相对法氏囊重量不受接种疫苗的影响。这项实验室水平的研究表明,该假定疫苗是安全的,可能有效,但可能会导致气囊炎水平升高。这些发现需要在更大规模的田间试验中得到证实。