妇科肿瘤学韩国学会、韩国妇产科学会和妇科内镜和微创外科韩国学会关于宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术的微创外科立场声明。
Minimally invasive surgery for radical hysterectomy in women with cervical cancer: Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Korean Society of Gynecologic Endoscopy and Minimally Invasive Surgery position statement.
机构信息
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
出版信息
J Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Sep;30(5):e104. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e104.
Abstract
On the basis of emerging data and the current understanding of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for radical hysterectomy (RH) in women with cervical cancer, the Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Korean Society of Gynecologic Endoscopy and Minimally Invasive Surgery support the following recommendations: According to the recently published phase III Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) trial-a prospective randomized clinical trial-disease-free survival and overall survival rates of MIS RH are significantly lower than those of open RH. Gynecologic oncologists should be aware of the emerging data on MIS RH for early-stage cervical cancer. The results of the LACC trial, together with institutional data, should be discussed with patients before choosing MIS RH. MIS RH should be performed for optimal candidates according to the current practice guidelines by gynecologic oncologists who are skilled at performing MIS.
摘要
基于微创外科（MIS）治疗宫颈癌根治术（RH）的新数据和当前认识，韩国妇科肿瘤学会、韩国妇产科医师学会和韩国妇科内镜与微创外科学会支持以下建议：根据最近发表的 III 期腹腔镜宫颈癌治疗（LACC）试验——一项前瞻性随机临床试验，MIS RH 的无病生存率和总生存率明显低于开腹 RH。妇科肿瘤医生应该了解关于早期宫颈癌 MIS RH 的新数据。LACC 试验的结果以及机构数据应在选择 MIS RH 之前与患者进行讨论。根据妇科肿瘤医生熟练掌握的 MIS 实践指南，应仅在合适的候选者中施行 MIS RH。
相似文献
1
Minimally invasive surgery for radical hysterectomy in women with cervical cancer: Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Korean Society of Gynecologic Endoscopy and Minimally Invasive Surgery position statement.妇科肿瘤学韩国学会、韩国妇产科学会和妇科内镜和微创外科韩国学会关于宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术的微创外科立场声明。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Sep;30(5):e104. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e104.
2
Minimally Invasive Surgery for Cervical Cancer in Light of the LACC Trial: What Have We Learned?基于 LACC 试验对宫颈癌的微创外科治疗：我们学到了什么？
Curr Oncol. 2022 Feb 14;29(2):1093-1106. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29020093.
3
Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Is Associated With Reduced Morbidity and Similar Survival Outcomes Compared With Laparotomy.与剖腹手术相比，宫颈癌的微创根治性子宫切除术与发病率降低和相似的生存结果相关。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Mar-Apr;24(3):402-406. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.12.005. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
4
Efficacy of different surgical approaches in the clinical and survival outcomes of patients with early-stage cervical cancer: protocol of a phase III multicentre randomised controlled trial in China.不同手术入路在早期宫颈癌患者临床结局和生存预后中的疗效：中国一项 III 期多中心随机对照临床试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 29;9(7):e029055. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029055.
5
Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: the Right Surgical Approach.宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术：正确的手术方式。
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2022 Jan;23(1):1-14. doi: 10.1007/s11864-021-00919-z. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
6
Comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer.对比微创根治性子宫切除术和传统开放性根治性子宫切除术在 Ib1 期-IIa2 期宫颈癌患者中的生存结局。
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Apr;153(1):3-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.01.008. Epub 2019 Jan 12.
7
Radical Hysterectomy and Age: Outcomes Comparison Based on a Minimally Invasive vs an Open Approach.根治性子宫切除术与年龄：基于微创与开放手术方式的结局比较。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Nov-Dec;25(7):1224-1230. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
8
Standardization and experience may influence the survival of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.标准化和经验可能影响宫颈癌腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术的生存。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 May;60(3):463-467. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2021.03.013.
9
Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with transvaginal closure of vaginal cuff - a multicenter analysis.腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术联合经阴道阴道残端关闭术——一项多中心分析。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 Jun;29(5):845-850. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000388.
10
Rapid dissemination of practice-changing information: A longitudinal analysis of real-world rates of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy before and after presentation of the LACC trial.实践变革信息的快速传播：LACC 试验前后真实世界中微创根治性子宫切除术比例的纵向分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 May;157(2):494-499. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.02.018. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
引用本文的文献
1
Ascertaining the Effects of Tissue Sealers on Minor Laparoscopic Procedures between Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents: A Prospective Cohort Study.确定组织密封剂对妇产科住院医师进行的小型腹腔镜手术的影响：一项前瞻性队列研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Apr 23;58(5):578. doi: 10.3390/medicina58050578.
2
Informed consent forms for gynecologic cancer surgery: recommendations from the Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology.妇科癌症手术知情同意书：韩国妇科肿瘤学会的建议
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2022 Mar;65(2):105-112. doi: 10.5468/ogs.22900. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
3
Informed consent forms for gynecologic cancer surgery: recommendations from the Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology.妇科癌症手术知情同意书：韩国妇科肿瘤学会的建议。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Mar;33(2):e42. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e42.
4
Machine Learning Models to Predict Survival Outcomes According to the Surgical Approach of Primary Radical Hysterectomy in Patients with Early Cervical Cancer.根据早期宫颈癌患者原发性根治性子宫切除术的手术方式预测生存结果的机器学习模型
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jul 23;13(15):3709. doi: 10.3390/cancers13153709.
5
Cervical Cancer Surgery: Current State of Affairs.宫颈癌手术：现状
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2021 Apr 30;10(2):75-83. doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_81_20. eCollection 2021 Apr-Jun.
6
Radical Hysterectomy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Bulky-Size Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis between the Robotic and Abdominal Approaches.新辅助化疗后局部巨大宫颈癌行根治性子宫切除术：机器人与开腹手术的回顾性对比分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 11;16(20):3833. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16203833.
7
The 61st Annual Meeting of the Japanese Society for Gynecologic Oncology (JSGO).日本妇科肿瘤学会（JSGO）第61届年会
J Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Nov;30(6):e114. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e114.
本文引用的文献
1
Cervical Cancer, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.《宫颈癌（第 3.2019 版）》，NCCN 肿瘤学临床实践指南。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Jan;17(1):64-84. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0001.
2
Incidence of cervical, endometrial, and ovarian cancer in Korea during 1999-2015.1999-2015 年韩国宫颈癌、子宫内膜癌和卵巢癌的发病率。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Jan;30(1):e38. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e38.
3
Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.微创与经腹根治性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 15;379(20):1895-1904. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1806395. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
4
Survival after Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.早期宫颈癌微创根治性子宫切除术的生存情况。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 15;379(20):1905-1914. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1804923. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
5
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.全球癌症统计数据 2018：GLOBOCAN 对全球 185 个国家/地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率的估计。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
6
Cervical cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.宫颈癌：ESMO 诊断、治疗及随访临床实践指南
Ann Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;28(suppl_4):iv72-iv83. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx220.
7
Practice guidelines for management of cervical cancer in Korea: a Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology Consensus Statement.韩国子宫颈癌管理实践指南：韩国妇科肿瘤学会共识声明
J Gynecol Oncol. 2017 May;28(3):e22. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e22. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
8
Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Early Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.早期宫颈癌的腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术：一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Nov;27(11):1132-1144. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0022. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
9
Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Is Associated With Reduced Morbidity and Similar Survival Outcomes Compared With Laparotomy.与剖腹手术相比，宫颈癌的微创根治性子宫切除术与发病率降低和相似的生存结果相关。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Mar-Apr;24(3):402-406. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.12.005. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
10
Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage cervical cancer.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗早期宫颈癌的对比
BMC Cancer. 2015 Nov 24;15:928. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1818-4.
Zotero 插件