Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Scand J Surg. 2020 Dec;109(4):279-288. doi: 10.1177/1457496919863943. Epub 2019 Jul 21.
We present an open retromuscular mesh technique for incisional hernia repair, the modified peritoneal flap hernioplasty, where the fascia is sutured to the mesh and the hernia sac utilized for anterior mesh coverage. The aim was to describe the modified peritoneal flap hernioplasty technique and to compare it to a retromuscular repair, without component separation, regarding short-term complications, patient satisfaction, abdominal wall complaints, and recurrent incisional hernia.
Consecutive patients operated electively with modified peritoneal flap hernioplasty technique (December 2012-December 2015) or retromuscular technique (Jan 2011-Oct 2014) were included in a retrospective single-center cohort study. Outcomes were evaluated from the Swedish Ventral Hernia Registry, by chart review, physical examination, and an abdominal wall complaints questionnaire.
The modified peritoneal flap hernioplasty group ( = 78) had larger hernias (mean width 10.4 vs 8.5 cm, = 0.005), more advanced Centers for Disease Control classification ( = 0.009), and more simultaneous gastrointestinal-tract surgery (23.1% vs 11.5%, = 0.041) than the retromuscular group ( = 96). No difference in short-term complications was seen. Incisional hernia recurrence was lower in the modified peritoneal flap hernioplasty group (1.4% vs 10.3%, = 0.023), and patients were more satisfied (93.8% vs 81.7%, = 0.032). Follow-up time was shorter in the modified peritoneal flap hernioplasty group (614 vs 1171 days, < 0.001).
This retrospective study showed similar rates of short-term complications, despite more complex hernias in the modified peritoneal flap hernioplasty group. Furthermore, a lower incisional hernia recurrence rate for the modified peritoneal flap hernioplasty technique compared with the retromuscular technique used in our department was found. If this holds true with equally long follow-up remains to be proven.
我们提出了一种开放式腹横筋膜后补片修补术(改良腹膜瓣修补术)治疗切口疝的方法,即将筋膜缝合到补片上,并利用疝囊进行前侧补片覆盖。本研究旨在描述改良腹膜瓣修补术技术,并将其与不进行腹横筋膜分离的后入路修补术进行比较,评估短期并发症、患者满意度、腹壁抱怨和复发性切口疝。
回顾性分析 2012 年 12 月至 2015 年 12 月期间采用改良腹膜瓣修补术(改良组)和 2011 年 1 月至 2014 年 10 月期间采用后入路修补术(对照组)的连续择期手术患者。通过病历回顾、体格检查和腹壁抱怨问卷评估结果。
改良组的疝更大(平均宽度 10.4cm 比 8.5cm, = 0.005)、疾病控制与预防中心(Centers for Disease Control,CDC)分类更严重( = 0.009)、同时行胃肠道手术的比例更高(23.1%比 11.5%, = 0.041)。两组短期并发症无差异。改良组切口疝复发率较低(1.4%比 10.3%, = 0.023),患者满意度更高(93.8%比 81.7%, = 0.032)。改良组的随访时间更短(614 天比 1171 天, < 0.001)。
本回顾性研究显示,尽管改良组的疝更复杂,但两组短期并发症发生率相似。此外,改良组的切口疝复发率低于本研究中采用的后入路修补术。如果随访时间相同,这种结果是否能够持续,还有待证实。