Nassif André Thá, Nagano Thais Ayumi, Villela Izabela Rodrigues, Simonetti Giulianna Ribas, Dias Bruno Francisco, Freitas Alexandre Coutinho Teixeira de
Digestive and Bariatric Surgery Service, Santa Casa de Misericórdia, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Postgraduation Program in Surgical Clinics, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2020 Nov 20;33(2):e1517. doi: 10.1590/0102-672020200002e1517. eCollection 2020.
Rives-Stoppa retromuscular technique: A) polypropylene mesh fixed on the posterior rectus sheath; B) rectus abdominal muscle; C) anterior rectus sheath being sutured. The best technique for incisional hernioplasty has not been established yet. One of the difficulties to compare these techniques is heterogeneity in the profile of the patients evaluated.
To analyze the results of three techniques for incisional hernioplasty after open bariatric surgery.
Patients who underwent incisional hernioplasty were divided into three groups: onlay technique, simple suture and retromuscular technique. Results and quality of life after repair using Carolina's Comfort Scale were evaluated through analysis of medical records, telephone contact and elective appointments.
363 surgical reports were analyzed and 263 were included: onlay technique (n=89), simple suture (n=100), retromuscular technique (n=74). The epidemiological profile of patients was similar between groups. The onlay technique showed higher seroma rates (28.89%) and used a surgical drain more frequently (55.56%). The simple suture technique required longer hospital stay (2.86 days). The quality of life score was worse for the retromuscular technique (8.43) in relation to the onlay technique (4.7) and the simple suture (2.34), especially because of complaints of chronic pain. There was no difference in short-term recurrence.
The retromuscular technique showed a worse quality of life than the other techniques in a homogeneous group of patients. The three groups showed no difference in terms of short-term hernia recurrence.
里夫斯-斯托帕肌后技术:A)聚丙烯网片固定于腹直肌后鞘;B)腹直肌;C)腹直肌前鞘缝合。目前尚未确定切口疝修补术的最佳技术。比较这些技术的困难之一在于所评估患者的特征存在异质性。
分析三种开放式减重手术后切口疝修补术的效果。
接受切口疝修补术的患者分为三组:补片植入技术组、单纯缝合组和肌后技术组。通过病历分析、电话联系和预约门诊评估使用卡罗莱纳舒适度量表评估修复后的结果和生活质量。
分析了363份手术报告,纳入263例:补片植入技术组(n = 89)、单纯缝合组(n = 100)、肌后技术组(n = 74)。各组患者的流行病学特征相似。补片植入技术组血清肿发生率较高(28.89%),且更频繁使用手术引流管(55.56%)。单纯缝合技术组住院时间更长(2.86天)。与补片植入技术组(4.7)和单纯缝合组(2.34)相比,肌后技术组的生活质量评分更差(8.43),尤其是因为慢性疼痛的主诉。短期复发率无差异。
在一组同质患者中,肌后技术组的生活质量比其他技术组差。三组在短期疝复发方面无差异。