School of Social Work, The University of Memphis , Memphis , Tennessee , USA.
Endowed Academic Chair on Social Work (Health), School of Social Work, University of Alabama , Tuscaloosa , Alabama , USA.
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2019 Nov-Dec;37(6):729-745. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2019.1608347. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
Korean Americans (KAs) report suboptimal colorectal cancer (CRC) screening adherence. This study investigated factors that enable KAs to adhere to CRC screening guidelines using the Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Utilization. Cross-sectional survey using self-reported measures of CRC screening behaviors. Purposive sampling was used to recruit 433 KAs aged 50-75 from the Atlanta metropolitan area who completed questionnaires measuring predisposing (i.e., gender, age, marital status, and educational attainment), enabling (income, health insurance, regular annual health checkups, doctor's recommendation English proficiency, CRC knowledge, self-efficacy for CRC screening, and decisional balance in CRC screening), and need (family cancer history and self-reported health status) factors associated with CRC screening. A multiple logistic regression model including all 14 predictor variables revealed that several enabling factors (i.e., income, regular annual health checkups, doctor's recommendation, self-efficacy, and decisional balance) independently predicted increased CRC screening adherence in KAs. No predisposing or need factors independently predicted CRC screening. To increase CRC screening adherence among KAs, psychosocial interventions should target on improving their self-efficacy and decisional balance regarding CRC screening, while policy interventions should focus on promoting health providers' CRC screening recommendations during routine health checkups.
美籍韩裔(KAs)报告称其结直肠癌(CRC)筛查的依从性较差。本研究采用安德森健康服务利用行为模型,调查了促使 KAs 遵循 CRC 筛查指南的因素。本研究采用横断面调查,使用自我报告的 CRC 筛查行为措施进行测量。采用目的抽样法,从亚特兰大大都市区招募了 433 名年龄在 50-75 岁之间的美籍韩裔,他们完成了问卷,问卷测量了与 CRC 筛查相关的倾向性因素(即性别、年龄、婚姻状况和教育程度)、促成因素(收入、医疗保险、定期年度健康检查、医生的推荐、英语水平、CRC 知识、CRC 筛查自我效能和 CRC 筛查决策平衡)和需求因素(家族癌症史和自我报告的健康状况)。一个包含所有 14 个预测变量的多元逻辑回归模型显示,一些促成因素(即收入、定期年度健康检查、医生的推荐、自我效能和决策平衡)独立地预测了 KAs 增加 CRC 筛查的依从性。没有倾向性或需求因素独立预测 CRC 筛查。为了提高 KAs 的 CRC 筛查依从性,心理社会干预措施应针对提高他们对 CRC 筛查的自我效能和决策平衡,而政策干预措施应侧重于在常规健康检查期间促进卫生保健提供者对 CRC 筛查的建议。