• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证为类风湿关节炎患者开发的风险感知问卷。

Validation of a risk perception questionnaire developed for patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

机构信息

Immunology and Rheumatology Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.

Research Unit in Clinical Epidemiology, Hospital de Especialidades, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City, Mexico.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Jul 22;14(7):e0219921. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219921. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0219921
PMID:31329625
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6645517/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Risk perception is a multidimensional phenomenon that describes the individual's judgment of the likelihood of experiencing something unpleasant. Risk perception helps to understand how rheumatoid arthritis patients perceive disease-related-risks. We developed and validated a risk perception questionnaire for Spanish speaking rheumatoid arthritis patients.

METHODS

The questionnaire development and validation was performed in 3 steps, using respective convenience samples. Step-1 included the conceptual model construction, 20 patient's interviews to identify components from the conceptual model-dimensions and 11 healthcare provider´s consultations who identified RA related manifestations/complications (network and frequencies analysis). Step-2 consisted of item generation and reduction and questionnaire feasibility (n = 100). Step-3 consisted of the questionnaire psychometric validation (n = 270), which included content, face, construct (exploratory factor analysis) and criterion validity (logistic regression analysis) and consistency and stability (Cronbach's α and test-retest).

RESULTS

Samples were representative of typical RA outpatients. Initial conceptual model included 7 dimensions, 3 for probability and 1 each, for responsibility, prevention, control and for severity (Step-1). The final version was considered feasible by the patients and included 27 items (Step-2). A five-factor model was most appropriated and resulted in 68.8% of the variance explained: Cronbach's α = 0.90, intraclass-correlation-coefficient = 0.93 (95% CI = 0.90-0.95). A positive relation between number of external criteria from the charts and risk perception was found; all items had ≥80% agreement from experts; patients agreed about item´s semantic clarity (89%) and format adequacy (97%), (Step-3).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk perception questionnaire was valid and reliable to evaluate risk perception construct in RA outpatients; it can be incorporated to routine care and clinical research, and guide interventions to improve patient's health behaviors.

摘要

背景

风险感知是一种多维现象,描述了个体对经历不愉快事件的可能性的判断。风险感知有助于了解类风湿关节炎患者如何感知与疾病相关的风险。我们开发并验证了一种用于西班牙语类风湿关节炎患者的风险感知问卷。

方法

问卷的开发和验证分三个步骤进行,使用了相应的便利样本。步骤 1 包括概念模型构建、对 20 名患者进行访谈以从概念模型维度中识别组件以及 11 名医疗保健提供者的咨询,以确定 RA 相关表现/并发症(网络和频率分析)。步骤 2 包括项目生成和缩减以及问卷可行性(n = 100)。步骤 3 包括问卷心理测量学验证(n = 270),包括内容、表面、结构(探索性因素分析)和标准有效性(逻辑回归分析)以及一致性和稳定性(Cronbach's α 和测试-重测)。

结果

样本代表了典型的类风湿关节炎门诊患者。初始概念模型包括 7 个维度,3 个用于概率,1 个用于责任、预防、控制和严重程度(步骤 1)。最终版本被患者认为是可行的,包括 27 个项目(步骤 2)。五因素模型最合适,可解释 68.8%的方差:Cronbach's α = 0.90,组内相关系数 = 0.93(95%置信区间= 0.90-0.95)。发现图表中的外部标准数量与风险感知之间存在正相关;所有项目都得到了专家≥80%的一致性;患者对项目的语义清晰度(89%)和格式适宜性(97%)表示同意(步骤 3)。

结论

风险感知问卷在评估类风湿关节炎门诊患者的风险感知结构方面是有效和可靠的;它可以纳入常规护理和临床研究,并指导干预措施以改善患者的健康行为。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85e1/6645517/4252f0232e72/pone.0219921.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85e1/6645517/4e9eb13957b6/pone.0219921.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85e1/6645517/4252f0232e72/pone.0219921.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85e1/6645517/4e9eb13957b6/pone.0219921.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85e1/6645517/4252f0232e72/pone.0219921.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of a risk perception questionnaire developed for patients with rheumatoid arthritis.验证为类风湿关节炎患者开发的风险感知问卷。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 22;14(7):e0219921. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219921. eCollection 2019.
2
Psychometric validation of an empowerment scale for Spanish-speaking patients with rheumatoid arthritis.类风湿关节炎西班牙语患者赋权量表的心理测量学验证。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2018 Oct 30;20(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s13075-018-1741-6.
3
Development and validation of a questionnaire assessing household work limitations (HOWL-Q) in women with rheumatoid arthritis.评估类风湿关节炎女性家务劳动受限的问卷(HOWL-Q)的制定和验证。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 23;15(7):e0236167. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236167. eCollection 2020.
4
[Adaptation and validation of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Quality of Life Scale (RAQoL) to Mexican Spanish].[类风湿性关节炎生活质量量表(RAQoL)在墨西哥西班牙语中的改编与验证]
Reumatol Clin. 2011 Mar-Apr;7(2):98-103. doi: 10.1016/j.reuma.2010.02.002. Epub 2010 Jun 18.
5
Quality of life of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Argentina: reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of a Spanish version of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Quality of Life questionnaire.阿根廷类风湿关节炎患者的生活质量:类风湿关节炎生活质量问卷西班牙语版的信度、效度和变化敏感性。
Clin Rheumatol. 2012 Jul;31(7):1065-71. doi: 10.1007/s10067-012-1976-6. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
6
Development of a quality of patient-health care provider communication scale from the perspective of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.从类风湿性关节炎患者的角度开发患者与医疗服务提供者沟通质量量表。
Chronic Illn. 2013 Jun;9(2):103-15. doi: 10.1177/1742395312455440. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
7
Construction and psychometric properties of the Belgian Rheumatoid Arthritis Disability Assessment (BRADA) questionnaire: a new tool for the evaluation of activity limitations in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.比利时类风湿关节炎残疾评估(BRADA)问卷的编制及心理测量学特性:一种用于评估类风湿关节炎患者活动受限的新工具。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2013 Jul-Aug;31(4):596-605. Epub 2013 Jul 30.
8
Validation, Reliability, and Clinical Significance of the Arabic Version of Bristol Rheumatoid Arthritis Fatigue Multi-Dimensional Questionnaire.《布里斯托尔类风湿性关节炎疲劳多维问卷阿拉伯语版的效度、信度及临床意义》
Curr Rheumatol Rev. 2024 Jun 28. doi: 10.2174/0115733971292438240620064231.
9
[Adaptation of health-related quality of life ("SF-36") questionnaire, its validation and assessment of performance for control group and patients with rheumatoid arthritis].["健康相关生活质量(“SF - 36”)问卷的改编、验证及其在对照组和类风湿性关节炎患者中的性能评估"]
Medicina (Kaunas). 2005;41(3):232-9.
10
Measuring fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study to evaluate the Bristol Rheumatoid Arthritis Fatigue Multi-Dimensional questionnaire, visual analog scales, and numerical rating scales.评估布里斯托类风湿关节炎疲劳多维问卷、视觉模拟量表和数字评定量表在类风湿关节炎疲劳测量中的横断面研究。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010 Nov;62(11):1559-68. doi: 10.1002/acr.20282. Epub 2010 Jun 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Cutaneous manifestations are frequent and diverse among patients with rheumatoid arthritis and impact their quality of life: a cross-sectional study in a cohort of patients with recent-onset disease.类风湿关节炎患者的皮肤表现频繁且多样,影响其生活质量:一项新发病例患者队列的横断面研究。
Clin Rheumatol. 2021 Sep;40(9):3581-3590. doi: 10.1007/s10067-021-05664-0. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
2
Markers of disease severity and positive family history are associated to significant risk perception in rheumatoid arthritis, while compliance with therapy is not: a cross-sectional study in 415 Mexican outpatients.疾病严重程度标志物和阳性家族史与类风湿关节炎患者的显著风险感知相关,而治疗依从性则不然:415 名墨西哥门诊患者的横断面研究。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2021 Feb 22;23(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13075-021-02440-y.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Decreasing muscle performance associated with increasing disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.类风湿关节炎患者的肌肉功能随着疾病活动度的增加而下降。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 9;13(4):e0194917. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194917. eCollection 2018.
2
Drug retention and discontinuation reasons between seven biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis -The ANSWER cohort study.类风湿关节炎患者七种生物制剂的药物保留和停药原因 - ANSWER 队列研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 15;13(3):e0194130. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194130. eCollection 2018.
3
Lung cancer risk perception biases.
Association of significant risk perception with the use of complementary and alternative medicine: A cross-sectional study in Hispanic patients with rheumatoid arthritis.重大风险感知与补充和替代医学使用的关联:西班牙裔类风湿关节炎患者的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 13;15(8):e0237504. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237504. eCollection 2020.
肺癌风险认知偏差。
Prev Med. 2018 May;110:16-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.01.020. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
4
Adherence of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus to medications: the role of risk preferences.2型糖尿病患者的药物依从性:风险偏好的作用。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2018 Feb;34(2):345-351. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1397506. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
5
Importance of Risk Perception: Predictors of PrEP Acceptance Among Thai MSM and TG Women at a Community-Based Health Service.风险认知的重要性:基于社区的健康服务中泰国男男性行为者和变性女性对暴露前预防(PrEP)的接受度预测因素
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017 Dec 15;76(5):473-481. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001536.
6
Patient's perspective of sustained remission in rheumatoid arthritis.类风湿关节炎患者对持续缓解的看法。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Sep 2;18(1):379. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1717-8.
7
Worry and risk perception of breast cancer in a prevention trial of low dose tamoxifen in midlife postmenopausal hormone users.低剂量他莫昔芬对中年绝经后激素使用者乳腺癌预防试验中的担忧与风险认知
Breast. 2017 Aug;34:108-114. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 May 29.
8
EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2016 update.EULAR 推荐的类风湿关节炎治疗策略:2016 年更新版
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jun;76(6):960-977. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210715. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
9
Mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a 15-year prospective cohort study.类风湿关节炎患者的死亡率:一项15年前瞻性队列研究。
Rheumatol Int. 2017 Apr;37(4):487-493. doi: 10.1007/s00296-016-3638-5. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
10
Adherence to Self-Care Behaviors among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes-The Role of Risk Preferences.2型糖尿病患者自我护理行为的依从性——风险偏好的作用。
Value Health. 2016 Sep-Oct;19(6):844-851. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.003. Epub 2016 May 21.