Children Clinical University Hospital, LV-1004 Riga, Latvia.
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Riga Stradin's University, LV-1038 Riga, Latvia.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 Jul 21;55(7):394. doi: 10.3390/medicina55070394.
The aim of the study was to assess whether there were differences between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and diffusion-weighted imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS) sequences in non-prepared and prepared bowels before and after preparation with an enteric hyperosmolar agent, to assess whether ADC measurements have the potential to avoid bowel preparation and whether ADC-DWIBS has advantages over ADC-DWI. 106 adult patients without evidence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) underwent magnetic resonance (MR) enterography before and after bowel preparation. ADC-DWI and ADC-DWIBS values were measured in the intestinal and colonic walls demonstrating high signal intensity (SI) at DWI tracking images of b = 800 s/mm before and after preparation. There were significant difference ( < 0.0001) in both ADC-DWI and ADC-DWIBS results between non-prepared and prepared jejunum for DWI being 1.09 × 10 mm/s and 1.76 × 10 mm/s, respectively, and for DWIBS being 0.91 × 10 mm/s and 1.75 × 10 mm/s, respectively. Both ADC-DWI and DWIBS also showed significant difference between non-prepared and prepared colon ( < 0.0001), with DWI values 1.41 × 10 mm/s and 2.13 × 10 mm/s, and DWIBS-1.01 × 10 mm/s and 2.04 × 10 mm/s, respectively. No significant difference between ADC-DWI and ADC-DWIBS was found in prepared jejunum ( = 0.84) and prepared colon ( = 0.58), whereas a significant difference was found in non-prepared jejunum and non-prepared colon ( = 0.0001 in both samples). ADC between DWI and DWIBS does not differ in prepared bowel walls but demonstrates a difference in non-prepared bowel. ADC in non-prepared bowel is lower than in prepared bowel and possible overlap with the ADC range of IBD is possible in non-prepared bowel. ADC-DWIBS has no advantage over ADC-DWI in regard to IBD assessment.
这项研究的目的是评估在未准备和准备后的肠道中,扩散加权成像(DWI)和背景抑制弥散加权成像(DWIBS)序列的表观弥散系数(ADC)值之间是否存在差异,以评估 ADC 测量是否有可能避免肠道准备,以及 ADC-DWIBS 是否优于 ADC-DWI。106 名无炎症性肠病(IBD)证据的成年患者在肠道准备前后进行了磁共振(MR)肠造影检查。在准备前后,在 DWI 跟踪图像上显示高信号强度(SI)的肠壁和结肠壁中测量 ADC-DWI 和 ADC-DWIBS 值,b = 800 s/mm。未准备和准备后的空肠 DWI 的 ADC-DWI 和 ADC-DWIBS 结果差异有统计学意义(<0.0001),分别为 1.09×10mm/s 和 1.76×10mm/s,DWIBS 分别为 0.91×10mm/s 和 1.75×10mm/s。未准备和准备后的结肠 ADC-DWI 和 DWIBS 结果差异也有统计学意义(<0.0001),DWI 值分别为 1.41×10mm/s 和 2.13×10mm/s,DWIBS 值分别为 1.01×10mm/s 和 2.04×10mm/s。在准备后的空肠(=0.84)和准备后的结肠(=0.58)中,ADC-DWI 和 ADC-DWIBS 之间无显著差异,而在未准备的空肠和未准备的结肠中存在显著差异(两个样本均<0.0001)。在准备后的肠壁中,DWI 和 DWIBS 的 ADC 无差异,但在未准备的肠壁中存在差异。未准备的肠壁 ADC 低于准备后的肠壁,且在未准备的肠壁中可能与 IBD 的 ADC 范围重叠。在 IBD 评估方面,ADC-DWIBS 并不优于 ADC-DWI。