• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将支持性育儿资源嵌入母婴和早期照护途径:一项混合方法评估。

Embedding supportive parenting resources into maternity and early years care pathways: a mixed methods evaluation.

机构信息

Maternal and Infant Nutrition and Nurture Unit, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, PR1 2HE, UK.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Jul 22;19(1):253. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2388-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12884-019-2388-2
PMID:31331285
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6647328/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

During pregnancy and postnatally, women seek information from a variety of sources. The potential to incorporate educational pregnancy and parenting resources into conventional health services is underexplored. In 2014-2016, UK-based charity Best Beginnings used an embedding model to embed three of their resources - the Baby Buddy app, Baby Express magazine, and 'From Bump to Breastfeeding' DVD - into maternity and early years care pathways at three sites in the north of England. A mixed-methods evaluation comprising an impact evaluation and a process evaluation was undertaken. Here we report findings from the process evaluation that aimed to understand the embedding process, explore maternity and early years' professionals' views and use of the resources, explore women's engagement with and views of the resources, and identify barriers and facilitators to the embedding process.

METHODS

We carried out semi-structured interviews with stakeholders (professionals involved in embedding) and observations of embedding activities to understand how embedding worked. Surveys of postnatal women were conducted over a two-month period both prior to, and after, the resources had been embedded, to ascertain engagement with and views of the resources. A survey of professionals was carried out post-embedding to understand how, where and when the resources were used in practice, and professionals' views. Descriptive and thematic analyses were undertaken.

RESULTS

Thirty stakeholders took part in interviews. Surveys were completed by 146 professionals, and by 161 and 192 women in the pre and post-embedding phases respectively. Themes derived from analysis of qualitative data were 'Implementation of the embedding model', 'Promotion and distribution of, and engagement with, the resources', 'Fit with care pathways', and 'Perceptions of the resources'. While survey responses indicated that embedding of the resources into practice was not yet complete, those who had used the resources believed that they had helped increase knowledge, build confidence and support relationship-building.

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporating supportive parenting resources into maternity and early years' care pathways requires a planned embedding approach, committed champions, and senior management support. Findings indicate largely positive views of women and professionals, and suggest the resources can be a beneficial aid for families.

摘要

背景

在孕期和产后,女性会从各种渠道获取信息。将教育性孕产和育儿资源纳入常规保健服务的潜力尚未得到充分开发。2014 年至 2016 年,英国慈善机构 Best Beginnings 采用嵌入式模式,将其三种资源——Baby Buddy 应用程序、Baby Express 杂志和“从怀孕到母乳喂养”DVD——嵌入英格兰北部三个地点的母婴保健和早期儿童保健路径中。采用了一项混合方法评估,包括影响评估和过程评估。在此,我们报告了过程评估的结果,旨在了解嵌入式过程,探索母婴保健和早期儿童专业人员对资源的看法和使用情况,探索女性对资源的参与度和看法,并确定嵌入式过程的障碍和促进因素。

方法

我们对利益攸关方(参与嵌入式工作的专业人员)进行了半结构化访谈,并对嵌入式活动进行了观察,以了解嵌入式工作的运作方式。在资源嵌入前后的两个月内,对产后女性进行了调查,以确定她们对资源的参与度和看法。在资源嵌入后,对专业人员进行了调查,以了解他们在实践中如何、何处和何时使用资源以及他们的看法。进行了描述性和主题分析。

结果

共有 30 名利益攸关方参与了访谈。在资源嵌入前后分别有 146 名专业人员和 161 名和 192 名女性完成了调查。从定性数据分析中得出的主题包括“实施嵌入式模型”、“资源的推广和分发以及对资源的参与”、“与保健路径的契合”和“对资源的看法”。虽然调查结果表明,资源的嵌入尚未完全融入实践,但那些使用过资源的人认为,这些资源有助于增加知识、增强信心和支持关系建设。

结论

将支持性育儿资源纳入母婴保健和早期儿童保健路径需要采用有计划的嵌入式方法、有坚定的拥护者和高级管理层的支持。调查结果表明,女性和专业人员的看法基本是积极的,并表明这些资源可以成为家庭的有益帮助。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/762d/6647328/0dd0419efd24/12884_2019_2388_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/762d/6647328/0dd0419efd24/12884_2019_2388_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/762d/6647328/0dd0419efd24/12884_2019_2388_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Embedding supportive parenting resources into maternity and early years care pathways: a mixed methods evaluation.将支持性育儿资源嵌入母婴和早期照护途径:一项混合方法评估。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Jul 22;19(1):253. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2388-2.
2
Impact of parenting resources on breastfeeding, parenting confidence and relationships.父母资源对母乳喂养、育儿信心和亲子关系的影响。
Midwifery. 2020 Feb;81:102591. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2019.102591. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
3
Minoritised ethnic women's experiences of inequities and discrimination in maternity services in North-West England: a mixed-methods study.英格兰西北部少数民族妇女在孕产服务中遭遇的不平等和歧视:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Dec 22;22(1):958. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05279-6.
4
How can maternity services be developed to effectively address maternal obesity? A qualitative study.如何发展孕产服务以有效地解决产妇肥胖问题?一项定性研究。
Midwifery. 2011 Oct;27(5):e170-7. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2010.01.007. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
5
First-time Mothers' Understanding and Use of a Pregnancy and Parenting Mobile App (The Baby Buddy App): Qualitative Study Using Appreciative Inquiry.新手妈妈对一款怀孕育儿手机应用(Baby Buddy 应用)的理解和使用情况:使用欣赏式探询的定性研究
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Nov 21;10(11):e32757. doi: 10.2196/32757.
6
Stakeholders' views of the Baby Friendly Initiative implementation and impact: a mixed methods study.利益相关者对“爱婴医院倡议”实施及其影响的看法:一项混合方法研究。
Int Breastfeed J. 2024 Jul 12;19(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13006-024-00639-8.
7
Baby Buddy App for Breastfeeding and Behavior Change: Retrospective Study of the App Using the Behavior Change Wheel.婴儿伴侣应用程序促进母乳喂养和行为改变:使用行为改变轮评估该应用程序的回顾性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Apr 15;9(4):e25668. doi: 10.2196/25668.
8
Health professionals' views on health literacy issues for culturally and linguistically diverse women in maternity care: barriers, enablers and the need for an integrated approach.医疗保健专业人员对孕产护理中文化和语言背景多样的女性的健康素养问题的看法:障碍、促进因素以及采取综合方法的必要性。
Aust Health Rev. 2018 Feb;42(1):10-20. doi: 10.1071/AH17067.
9
An evaluation of mindfulness-based childbirth and parenting courses for pregnant women and prospective fathers/partners within the UK NHS (MBCP-4-NHS).对英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)中针对孕妇及准父亲/伴侣开展的基于正念的分娩与育儿课程(MBCP-4-NHS)的评估。
Midwifery. 2018 Sep;64:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 May 26.
10
How is maternal psychosocial health assessed and promoted in the early postnatal period? Findings from a review of hospital postnatal care in Victoria, Australia.产后早期如何评估和促进产妇的心理社会健康?澳大利亚维多利亚州医院产后护理综述的结果。
Midwifery. 2007 Sep;23(3):287-97. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2006.06.003. Epub 2006 Nov 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Baby Buddy App for Breastfeeding and Behavior Change: Retrospective Study of the App Using the Behavior Change Wheel.婴儿伴侣应用程序促进母乳喂养和行为改变:使用行为改变轮评估该应用程序的回顾性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Apr 15;9(4):e25668. doi: 10.2196/25668.
2
Implementation science in maternity care: a scoping review.产科学实施科学:范围综述。
Implement Sci. 2021 Feb 4;16(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01083-6.
3
"Putting Meat on the Bones": Understanding the Implementation of a Community-Based Early Intervention and Prevention Programme-Contextual, Person, and Programme Influences.

本文引用的文献

1
Women's experiences with using a smartphone app (the Pregnant+ app) to manage gestational diabetes mellitus in a randomised controlled trial.在一项随机对照试验中,女性使用智能手机应用程序(Pregnant+应用程序)管理妊娠期糖尿病的经历。
Midwifery. 2018 Mar;58:102-108. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.12.021. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
2
Evaluation of a smartphone nutrition and physical activity application to provide lifestyle advice to pregnant women: The SNAPP randomised trial.评价一款为孕妇提供生活方式建议的智能手机营养与身体活动应用程序:SNAPP 随机试验。
Matern Child Nutr. 2018 Jan;14(1). doi: 10.1111/mcn.12502. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
3
“添砖加瓦”:理解基于社区的早期干预和预防计划的实施——背景、人和计划的影响。
Prev Sci. 2021 Jan;22(1):113-129. doi: 10.1007/s11121-020-01170-y. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
4
"It only takes two minutes to ask"-a qualitative study with women on using the FIGO Nutrition Checklist in pregnancy.“只需两分钟询问”-一项针对女性在妊娠期间使用 FIGO 营养清单的定性研究。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020 Sep;151 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):45-50. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13322.
5
Examining the use of the FIGO Nutrition Checklist in routine antenatal practice: multistakeholder feedback to implementation.检查 FIGO 营养清单在常规产前实践中的使用:实施多方利益相关者反馈。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020 Sep;151 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):51-56. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13323.
Perceptions of Patient Engagement Applications During Pregnancy: A Qualitative Assessment of the Patient's Perspective.
孕期患者参与应用程序的认知:基于患者视角的定性评估
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 May 26;5(5):e73. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.7040.
4
Views of Women and Health Professionals on mHealth Lifestyle Interventions in Pregnancy: A Qualitative Investigation.女性和健康专业人士对孕期移动医疗生活方式干预的看法:一项定性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Oct 28;3(4):e99. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.4869.
5
Efficacy of e-technologies in improving breastfeeding outcomes among perinatal women: a meta-analysis.电子技术对改善围产期妇女母乳喂养结局的效果:一项荟萃分析。
Matern Child Nutr. 2016 Jul;12(3):381-401. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12202. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
6
An emerging model of maternity care: smartphone, midwife, doctor?一种新兴的孕产护理模式:智能手机、助产士、医生?
Women Birth. 2014 Mar;27(1):64-7. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2013.11.001. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
7
Keeping baby SAFE in pregnancy: evaluating the brochure.保障孕期母婴安全:评估宣传册。
Midwifery. 2013 Feb;29(2):174-9. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2011.11.008. Epub 2012 Nov 10.
8
Improving early relationships: a randomized, controlled trial of an age-paced parenting newsletter.
Pediatrics. 2009 Jan;123(1):241-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1872.
9
Health literacy and the information needs and dilemmas of first-time mothers over 35 years.健康素养以及35岁以上初产妇的信息需求与困境
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Jun;16(6):1162-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01600.x.
10
A new Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale: links with early maternal mood.一种新的母婴情感联结量表:与产妇早期情绪的关联
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2005 May;8(1):45-51. doi: 10.1007/s00737-005-0074-z. Epub 2005 May 4.