• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提示更健康的外卖选择:(披露)三种推动因素对食品选择影响的现场实验。

Cueing healthier alternatives for take-away: a field experiment on the effects of (disclosing) three nudges on food choices.

机构信息

Department of Social, Health and Organisational Psychology, Utrecht University, PO Box 80140, 3508TC, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Department of Marketing, University of Groningen, Nettelbosje 2, 9747AE, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2019 Jul 22;19(1):974. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7323-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-019-7323-y
PMID:31331307
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6647265/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The current field experiment demonstrates the effectiveness of nudging to promote healthy food choices.

METHODS

Three types of nudges were implemented at a take-away food vendor: 1) an accessibility nudge that placed fruits at the front counter; 2) a salience nudge that presented healthy bread rolls to be more visually attractive; and 3) a social proof nudge that conveyed yoghurt as a popular choice. We additionally assessed whether nudging effects would remain robust when a disclosure message was included. The field experiment was conducted over a seven-week period. The measured outcome was the sales of the targeted healthy food products.

RESULTS

The accessibility nudge significantly increased the sales of the fresh fruits. The impact of the salience nudge was limited presumably due to existing preferences or habits that typically facilitate bread purchases. As the sales of the yoghurt shakes remained consistently low over the seven-week period the impact of the social proof nudge remained unexamined. Critically, disclosing the purpose of the nudges did not interfere with effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Current findings suggest nudging as an effective strategy for healthy food promotion, and offer implications for topical debate regarding the ethics of nudges.

摘要

背景

本次现场实验证明了轻推策略在促进健康食品选择方面的有效性。

方法

在一家外卖食品供应商实施了三种类型的轻推策略:1)可及性轻推,将水果放在前台;2)凸显性轻推,使健康面包卷更具视觉吸引力;3)社会认同轻推,将酸奶传达为一种受欢迎的选择。我们还评估了当包含披露信息时,轻推效果是否仍然稳健。现场实验持续了七周。测量的结果是目标健康食品的销售情况。

结果

可及性轻推显著增加了新鲜水果的销量。凸显性轻推的影响有限,可能是由于现有的偏好或习惯通常有利于面包购买。由于酸奶奶昔的销售在七周内一直保持较低水平,社会认同轻推的影响仍未得到检验。至关重要的是,披露轻推的目的并没有干扰效果。

结论

目前的研究结果表明,轻推是促进健康食品的有效策略,并为有关轻推伦理的热门辩论提供了启示。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac7d/6647265/d18f6a0840b2/12889_2019_7323_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac7d/6647265/8434408e8367/12889_2019_7323_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac7d/6647265/d18f6a0840b2/12889_2019_7323_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac7d/6647265/8434408e8367/12889_2019_7323_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac7d/6647265/d18f6a0840b2/12889_2019_7323_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Cueing healthier alternatives for take-away: a field experiment on the effects of (disclosing) three nudges on food choices.提示更健康的外卖选择:(披露)三种推动因素对食品选择影响的现场实验。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jul 22;19(1):974. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7323-y.
2
Nudging at the checkout counter - A longitudinal study of the effect of a food repositioning nudge on healthy food choice.在结账柜台旁轻轻一推——一项关于重新定位食物的促进行动对健康食品选择影响的纵向研究。
Psychol Health. 2018 Jun;33(6):800-809. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2017.1416116. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
3
Nudging healthy food choices: a field experiment at the train station.推动健康食品选择:火车站的一项实地实验。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2016 Jun;38(2):e133-7. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdv096. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
4
The effect of nudges aligned with the renewed Flemish Food Triangle on the purchase of fresh fruits: An on-campus restaurant experiment.基于新弗拉芒食品三角的推动对购买新鲜水果的影响:校园餐厅实验。
Appetite. 2020 Jan 1;144:104479. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104479. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
5
Nudges and choice architecture to promote healthy food purchases in adults: A systematized review.推动成年人购买健康食品的助推与选择架构:一项系统评价
Psychol Addict Behav. 2023 Feb;37(1):87-103. doi: 10.1037/adb0000892. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
6
Nudging customers towards healthier food and beverage purchases in a real-life online supermarket: a multi-arm randomized controlled trial.在现实生活中的在线超市中推动顾客购买更健康的食品和饮料:一项多臂随机对照试验。
BMC Med. 2022 Jan 17;20(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-02205-z.
7
The effects of nudging and pricing strategies on the availability and purchases of ultra-processed foods: A secondary analysis of the Supreme Nudge trial.推动和定价策略对超加工食品供应和购买的影响:超级推动试验的二次分析。
Appetite. 2024 Oct 1;201:107599. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2024.107599. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
8
Choosing healthier foods in recreational sports settings: a mixed methods investigation of the impact of nudging and an economic incentive.在休闲运动场所选择更健康的食物:一项关于助推和经济激励影响的混合方法调查
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014 Jan 22;11:6. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-11-6.
9
Customer support for nudge strategies to promote fruit and vegetable intake in a university food service.针对大学餐饮服务中推广水果和蔬菜摄入的推动策略的客户支持。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 10;22(1):706. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13054-7.
10
Public acceptance of default nudges to promote healthy and sustainable food choices.公众对默认激励措施促进健康和可持续食物选择的接受程度。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Nov 22;23(1):2311. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17127-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring nudging strategies for plant-based dietary choices in hospital patients: a quasi-experimental study.探索针对住院患者植物性饮食选择的助推策略:一项准实验研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2025 Jul 1;22(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12966-025-01793-w.
2
The role of attention and health goals in nudging healthy food choice.注意力和健康目标在推动健康食品选择方面的作用。
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 19;14:1270207. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1270207. eCollection 2023.
3
The effects of default nudges on promoting approval of welfare cuts: An exploration during COVID-19.

本文引用的文献

1
An In-Store Experiment on the Effect of Accessibility on Sales of Wholegrain and White Bread in Supermarkets.一项关于超市中全麦面包和白面包可达性对销售影响的店内实验。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 24;11(3):e0151915. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151915. eCollection 2016.
2
Shopper marketing nutrition interventions: Social norms on grocery carts increase produce spending without increasing shopper budgets.购物者营销营养干预措施:购物车上的社会规范可增加农产品支出,而不增加购物者预算。
Prev Med Rep. 2015 Apr 18;2:287-91. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.04.007. eCollection 2015.
3
Non-conscious processes in changing health-related behaviour: a conceptual analysis and framework.
默认助推措施对促进福利削减批准的影响:新冠疫情期间的一项探索
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 11;13:1038750. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1038750. eCollection 2022.
4
Evaluation of two social norms nudge interventions to promote healthier food choices in a Canadian grocery store.评估两种社会规范推动干预措施,以促进加拿大杂货店更健康的食品选择。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Oct 20;22(1):1946. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14370-8.
5
Are You "Nudgeable"? Factors Affecting the Acceptance of Healthy Eating Nudges in a Cafeteria Setting.你是否“可引导”?影响自助餐厅中健康饮食提示接受度的因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 30;19(7):4107. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074107.
6
Nudgeability: Mapping Conditions of Susceptibility to Nudge Influence.可推动性:分析易受推动影响的条件。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 Mar;17(2):346-359. doi: 10.1177/1745691621995183. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
7
Equity Effects of Dietary Nudging Field Experiments: Systematic Review.饮食诱导的实验性政策干预的公平性影响:系统评价。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jul 23;9:668998. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.668998. eCollection 2021.
8
Using nudges to promote physical activity and to reduce sedentary behaviour in the workplace: a scoping review protocol.利用推动手段促进工作场所中的身体活动和减少久坐行为:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 19;10(11):e038205. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038205.
9
Can Healthy Checkout Counters Improve Food Purchases? Two Real-Life Experiments in Dutch Supermarkets.健康结账柜台能否改善食品购买行为?荷兰超市的两项真实实验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 19;17(22):8611. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228611.
10
Effect of Impulsivity Traits on Food Choice within a Nudging Intervention.冲动特质对推动干预下食物选择的影响。
Nutrients. 2020 May 14;12(5):1402. doi: 10.3390/nu12051402.
改变与健康相关行为的无意识过程:概念分析与框架
Health Psychol Rev. 2016 Dec;10(4):381-394. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2015.1138093. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
4
The Council of Psychological Advisers.心理顾问委员会。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2016;67:713-37. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-081914-124745. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
5
Nudging healthy food choices: a field experiment at the train station.推动健康食品选择:火车站的一项实地实验。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2016 Jun;38(2):e133-7. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdv096. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
6
The global impact of non-communicable diseases on healthcare spending and national income: a systematic review.非传染性疾病对医疗支出和国民收入的全球影响:系统评价。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2015 Apr;30(4):251-77. doi: 10.1007/s10654-014-9984-2. Epub 2015 Jan 18.
7
Social norms and their influence on eating behaviours.社会规范及其对饮食行为的影响。
Appetite. 2015 Mar;86:38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.10.021. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
8
Who diets? Most people and especially when they worry about food.谁节食?大多数人,尤其是当他们担心食物的时候。
Appetite. 2014 Sep;80:103-8. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.05.011. Epub 2014 May 15.
9
Eat me if you can: cognitive mechanisms underlying the distance effect.吃我啊,如果你能的话:距离效应背后的认知机制。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 18;8(12):e84643. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084643. eCollection 2013.
10
Health on impulse: when low self-control promotes healthy food choices.冲动中的健康:低自我控制如何促进健康食物选择。
Health Psychol. 2014 Feb;33(2):103-9. doi: 10.1037/a0031785. Epub 2013 Mar 11.