• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

吃我啊,如果你能的话:距离效应背后的认知机制。

Eat me if you can: cognitive mechanisms underlying the distance effect.

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013 Dec 18;8(12):e84643. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084643. eCollection 2013.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0084643
PMID:24367684
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3867504/
Abstract

Proximal objects provide affordances that activate the motor information involved in interacting with the objects. This effect has previously been shown for artifacts but not for natural objects, such as food. This study examined whether the sight of proximal food, compared to distant food activates eating-related information. In two experiments reaction times to verbal labels following the sight of proximal and distant objects (food and toys) were measured. Verbal labels included function words that were compatible with one object category (eating and playing) and observation words compatible with both object categories. The sight of food was expected to activate eating-related information when presented at proximity but not at distance, as reflected by faster reaction times to proximal than distant compatible eating words and no difference between reaction times to proximal and distant food for observation words (Experiment 1). Experiment 2 additionally compared the reaction times to wrapped and unwrapped food. The distance effect was expected to occur only for unwrapped food because only unwrapped food is readily edible. As expected, Experiment 1 and 2 revealed faster responses to compatible eating words at proximity than at distance. In Experiment 2 this distance effect occurred only for readily edible, unwrapped food but not for wrapped food. For observation words no difference in response times between the distances was found. These findings suggest that the sight of proximal food activates eating-related information, which could explain people's differential behavioral responses to reachable versus distant food. The activation of eating-related information upon sight of accessible food could provide a cognition-based explanation for mindless eating.

摘要

近端物体提供了可供使用的功能,这些功能激活了与物体交互相关的运动信息。这一效应以前在人工制品中得到了证实,但在自然物体(如食物)中尚未得到证实。本研究检验了与远距离食物相比,近端食物的视觉刺激是否会激活与进食相关的信息。在两个实验中,我们测量了参与者在看到近端和远距离物体(食物和玩具)后的口头标签反应时间。口头标签包括与一个物体类别(进食和玩耍)兼容的功能词,以及与两个物体类别都兼容的观察词。当食物呈现在近端时,预计会激活与进食相关的信息,而在远距离时则不会,这反映在近端比远距离更兼容的进食词的反应时间更快,而对观察词的反应时间则没有差异(实验 1)。实验 2还比较了包裹和未包裹食物的反应时间。只有未包裹的食物才是易于食用的,因此预计只有在未包裹的食物中才会出现距离效应。正如预期的那样,实验 1 和 2 显示,与远距离相比,参与者对近端更兼容的进食词的反应更快。在实验 2 中,只有易于食用的未包裹食物出现了这种距离效应,而包裹食物则没有。对于观察词,在距离之间没有发现反应时间的差异。这些发现表明,近端食物的视觉刺激激活了与进食相关的信息,这可以解释人们对可触及和远距离食物的不同行为反应。对可获取食物的视觉刺激激活与进食相关的信息,为无意识进食提供了一种基于认知的解释。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb43/3867504/2613d7226b06/pone.0084643.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb43/3867504/47f1f06fb8ab/pone.0084643.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb43/3867504/0d9a7bee6f4d/pone.0084643.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb43/3867504/c350858831de/pone.0084643.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb43/3867504/2613d7226b06/pone.0084643.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb43/3867504/47f1f06fb8ab/pone.0084643.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb43/3867504/0d9a7bee6f4d/pone.0084643.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb43/3867504/c350858831de/pone.0084643.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb43/3867504/2613d7226b06/pone.0084643.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Eat me if you can: cognitive mechanisms underlying the distance effect.吃我啊,如果你能的话:距离效应背后的认知机制。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 18;8(12):e84643. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084643. eCollection 2013.
2
When objects are close to me: affordances in the peripersonal space.当物体靠近我时:近体空间中的可供使用性。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Apr;18(2):302-8. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0054-4.
3
[Study of the categorization process among patients with eating disorders: a new cognitive approach to psychopathology].[饮食失调患者分类过程的研究:精神病理学的一种新认知方法]
Encephale. 2005 Jan-Feb;31(1 Pt 1):82-91. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(05)82376-0.
4
Objects and their nouns in peripersonal space.近体物体及其名词
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Nov;49(13):3519-24. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.001. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
5
Sex related biases for attending to object color versus object position are reflected in reaction time and accuracy.性别相关的偏向,体现在对目标颜色与目标位置的反应时和准确率上。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 9;14(1):e0210272. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210272. eCollection 2019.
6
Defying Food - How Distance Determines Monkeys' Ability to Inhibit Reaching for Food.挑战食物——距离如何决定猴子抑制伸手取食的能力。
Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 18;7:158. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00158. eCollection 2016.
7
Where does an object trigger an action? An investigation about affordances in space.物体在何处引发动作?对空间可供性的研究。
Exp Brain Res. 2010 Nov;207(1-2):95-103. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2435-8. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
8
The space of affordances: a TMS study.可供性空间:一项 TMS 研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Apr;49(5):1369-1372. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.01.021. Epub 2011 Jan 15.
9
Visual objects speak louder than words: motor planning and weight in tool use and object transport.视觉对象比言语更有说服力:工具使用和物体搬运中的运动规划与重量
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 Nov;162:76-80. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.10.006. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
10
Eating tools in hand activate the brain systems for eating action: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.手中的进食工具会激活大脑中负责进食动作的系统:一项经颅磁刺激研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Jul;59:142-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 May 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Beyond Discrete Choices - Investigating the Effectiveness of a Proximity Nudge With Multiple Alternative Options.超越离散选择——探究具有多个替代选项的接近式助推的有效性
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 10;11:1211. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01211. eCollection 2020.
2
Implicit food odour priming effects on reactivity and inhibitory control towards foods.内隐食物气味对食物反应性和抑制控制的启动效应。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 9;15(6):e0228830. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228830. eCollection 2020.
3
Cueing healthier alternatives for take-away: a field experiment on the effects of (disclosing) three nudges on food choices.

本文引用的文献

1
Dissociating between object affordances and spatial compatibility effects using early response components.使用早期反应成分区分物体提供的作用和空间兼容性效应。
Front Psychol. 2013 Sep 4;4:591. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00591. eCollection 2013.
2
Handles lost in non-reachable space.无法触及空间中的手柄。
Exp Brain Res. 2013 Aug;229(2):197-202. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3607-0. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
3
The bottle and the glass say to me: "pour!".瓶子和杯子对我说:“倒!”。
提示更健康的外卖选择:(披露)三种推动因素对食品选择影响的现场实验。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jul 22;19(1):974. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7323-y.
4
Defying Food - How Distance Determines Monkeys' Ability to Inhibit Reaching for Food.挑战食物——距离如何决定猴子抑制伸手取食的能力。
Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 18;7:158. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00158. eCollection 2016.
5
How we remember what we can do.我们如何记住自己会做什么。
Socioaffect Neurosci Psychol. 2015 Oct 26;5:24807. doi: 10.3402/snp.v5.24807. eCollection 2015.
6
UnAdulterated - children and adults' visual attention to healthy and unhealthy food.未掺杂的——儿童和成人对健康与不健康食品的视觉注意力。
Eat Behav. 2015 Apr;17:90-3. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.01.009. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
Exp Brain Res. 2012 May;218(4):539-49. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3047-2. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
4
Objects and their nouns in peripersonal space.近体物体及其名词
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Nov;49(13):3519-24. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.001. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
5
Spatial dependency of action simulation.动作模拟的空间依赖性。
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Aug;212(4):635-44. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2748-2. Epub 2011 Jun 26.
6
Do distant foods decrease intake? The effect of food accessibility on consumption.远距食物会减少摄入量吗?食物可得性对消费的影响。
Psychol Health. 2012 Oct;27 Suppl 2:59-73. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2011.565341. Epub 2011 Jun 14.
7
Grasping possibilities for action: influence of object function and action capabilities.把握行动的可能性:物体功能和行动能力的影响。
Hum Mov Sci. 2011 Dec;30(6):1102-14. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2010.11.012. Epub 2011 May 7.
8
When objects are close to me: affordances in the peripersonal space.当物体靠近我时:近体空间中的可供使用性。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Apr;18(2):302-8. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0054-4.
9
The space of affordances: a TMS study.可供性空间:一项 TMS 研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Apr;49(5):1369-1372. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.01.021. Epub 2011 Jan 15.
10
The first taste is always with the eyes: a meta-analysis on the neural correlates of processing visual food cues.第一印象总是来自于视觉:一项关于处理视觉食物线索的神经关联的元分析。
Neuroimage. 2011 Mar 1;55(1):296-303. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.055. Epub 2010 Nov 25.