• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

女性如何体验乳房筛查的假阳性测试结果?一项定性研究的系统评价和主题综合分析。

How do women experience a false-positive test result from breast screening? A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.

机构信息

Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom.

Nightingale Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 2019 Aug;121(4):351-358. doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0524-4. Epub 2019 Jul 23.

DOI:10.1038/s41416-019-0524-4
PMID:31332283
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6738040/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This is the first review to identify, appraise and synthesise women's experiences of having a false-positive breast screening test result.

METHODS

We systematically searched eight databases for qualitative research reporting women's experiences of receiving a false-positive screening test result. Two reviewers independently screened articles. Eight papers reporting seven studies were included. Study quality was appraised. Data were thematically synthesised.

RESULTS

Women passively attended screening in order to prove their perceived good health. Consequently, being recalled was unexpected, shocking and disempowering: women felt without options. They endured great uncertainty and stress and sought clarity about their health (e.g. by scrutinising the wording of recall letters and conversations with healthcare professionals). Their result was accompanied by relief and welcome feelings of certainty about their health, but some received unclear explanations of their result, contributing to lasting breast cancer-related worry and an ongoing need for further reassurance.

CONCLUSION

The organisation of breast screening programmes may constrain choice for women: they became passive recipients. The way healthcare professionals verbally communicate results to women may contribute to lasting breast cancer-related worry. Women need more reassurance, emotional support and answers to their questions before and during screening assessment, and after receiving their result.

摘要

背景

这是第一项旨在识别、评价和综合女性对假阳性乳房筛查检测结果的体验的综述。

方法

我们系统地在 8 个数据库中搜索定性研究,以报告女性对假阳性筛查检测结果的体验。两名评审员独立筛选文章。最终纳入 8 篇报告 7 项研究的论文。评价了研究质量。对数据进行了主题综合。

结果

女性为了证明自己所谓的健康,被动地参加了筛查。因此,被召回是出乎意料、令人震惊和剥夺权力的:女性感到别无选择。她们承受着巨大的不确定性和压力,并寻求对自己健康状况的明确信息(例如,仔细审查召回信的措辞以及与医疗保健专业人员的对话)。检测结果呈阳性后,她们感到如释重负,对自己的健康状况感到安心,但有些人没有得到明确的检测结果解释,这导致了持续的与乳腺癌相关的担忧,以及对进一步保证的持续需求。

结论

乳房筛查项目的组织可能限制了女性的选择:她们成为了被动的接受者。医疗保健专业人员与女性口头沟通检测结果的方式可能会导致持续的与乳腺癌相关的担忧。女性在筛查评估之前、期间和之后需要更多的保证、情感支持和对她们问题的答案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5a9/6738040/25961f1658ce/41416_2019_524_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5a9/6738040/25961f1658ce/41416_2019_524_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5a9/6738040/25961f1658ce/41416_2019_524_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
How do women experience a false-positive test result from breast screening? A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.女性如何体验乳房筛查的假阳性测试结果?一项定性研究的系统评价和主题综合分析。
Br J Cancer. 2019 Aug;121(4):351-358. doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0524-4. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
2
Women's Experiences of Inaccurate Breast Cancer Screening Results: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Meta-synthesis.乳腺癌筛查结果不准确时女性的经历:一项系统综述与定性元分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2016 Jul 1;16(16):1-22. eCollection 2016.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Shared decision-making for supporting women's decisions about breast cancer screening.支持女性进行乳腺癌筛查决策的共享决策。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 10;5(5):CD013822. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013822.pub2.
5
A roller coaster of emotions and sense--coping with the perceived psychosocial consequences of a false-positive screening mammography.情绪与理智的过山车——应对乳腺钼靶筛查假阳性所带来的心理社会影响
J Clin Nurs. 2014 Jul;23(13-14):2053-62. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12426. Epub 2013 Dec 7.
6
Systematic review of the psychological consequences of false-positive screening mammograms.假阳性筛检乳房 X 光摄影的心理后果之系统性回顾。
Health Technol Assess. 2013 Mar;17(13):1-170, v-vi. doi: 10.3310/hta17130.
7
Women who are recalled for further investigation for breast screening: psychological consequences 3 years after recall and factors affecting re-attendance.因乳腺筛查被召回做进一步检查的女性:召回3年后的心理影响及影响再次就诊的因素。
J Public Health Med. 2001 Dec;23(4):292-300. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/23.4.292.
8
Healthcare professionals' experiences of caring for women with false-positive screening test results in the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme.医疗保健专业人员在国民保健制度乳房筛查计划中照顾假阳性筛查测试结果女性的经历。
Health Expect. 2024 Apr;27(2):e14023. doi: 10.1111/hex.14023.
9
Emotion constructs and outcome measures following false positive breast screening test results: A systematic review of reporting clarity and selection rationale.假阳性乳腺筛查试验结果后的情绪构建和结果测量:报告清晰度和选择理由的系统评价。
Psychooncology. 2024 Apr;33(4):e6334. doi: 10.1002/pon.6334.
10
How do women who are informed that they are at increased risk of breast cancer appraise their risk? A systematic review of qualitative research.得知自己乳腺癌风险增加的女性如何评估自己的风险?一项定性研究的系统评价。
Br J Cancer. 2022 Nov;127(11):1916-1924. doi: 10.1038/s41416-022-01944-x. Epub 2022 Aug 24.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of cancer expectations on psychological responses following a cancer signal detected result in asymptomatic multi-cancer detection (MCED) testing.癌症预期对无症状多癌检测(MCED)测试中癌症信号检测结果后的心理反应的影响。
Br J Cancer. 2025 Sep 9. doi: 10.1038/s41416-025-03180-5.
2
Informed choices for some, but not for others: An exploration of Australian midlife women's participation in mammography screening by social class.对一些人是明智的选择,对另一些人则不然:按社会阶层对澳大利亚中年女性参与乳房X光检查筛查情况的一项探究。
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057241305730. doi: 10.1177/17455057241305730.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report.心理学中定性原始研究、定性元分析研究和混合方法研究的期刊文章报告标准:APA 出版和传播委员会工作组报告。
Am Psychol. 2018 Jan;73(1):26-46. doi: 10.1037/amp0000151.
2
Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series-paper 3: methods for assessing methodological limitations, data extraction and synthesis, and confidence in synthesized qualitative findings.考克兰定性和实施方法组指南系列论文 3:评估方法学局限性、数据提取和综合以及对综合定性发现的信心的方法。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 May;97:49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.020. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
3
Optimising data sharing whilst protecting participant privacy: a data note describing processed data from a qualitative study of healthcare professionals' experiences of caring for women with false positive screening test results.
在保护参与者隐私的同时优化数据共享:一份数据说明,描述了对医疗保健专业人员护理筛查试验结果为假阳性的女性的经历进行定性研究得出的处理后数据。
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2025 Jan 12;13(1):2449400. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2024.2449400. eCollection 2025.
4
Decisions to decline breast screening and/or breast cancer treatment based on the potential harms of overdiagnosis and overtreatment: a qualitative study.基于过度诊断和过度治疗的潜在危害而拒绝乳房筛查和/或乳腺癌治疗的决定:一项定性研究
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 10;14(12):e089155. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089155.
5
Downstream healthcare use following breast cancer screening: a register-based cohort study.乳腺癌筛查后的下游医疗保健利用情况:一项基于登记册的队列研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2025 Mar 10;79(4):242-248. doi: 10.1136/jech-2024-222818.
6
Strategies to Overcome Erroneous Outcomes in Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) Testing: Insights From the COVID-19 Pandemic.克服逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测错误结果的策略:来自COVID-19大流行的见解
Cureus. 2024 Nov 3;16(11):e72954. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72954. eCollection 2024 Nov.
7
Association Between False-Positive Results and Return to Screening Mammography in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium Cohort.乳腺癌监测联盟队列中假阳性结果与重返筛查性乳房 X 光检查的关联。
Ann Intern Med. 2024 Oct;177(10):1297-1307. doi: 10.7326/M24-0123. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
8
Healthcare professionals' experiences of caring for women with false-positive screening test results in the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme.医疗保健专业人员在国民保健制度乳房筛查计划中照顾假阳性筛查测试结果女性的经历。
Health Expect. 2024 Apr;27(2):e14023. doi: 10.1111/hex.14023.
9
Long-term trends in incidence, characteristics and prognosis of screen-detected and interval cancers in women participating in the Dutch breast cancer screening programme.荷兰乳腺癌筛查项目中参加女性筛查性和间隔性癌症的发病率、特征和预后的长期趋势。
Br J Cancer. 2024 May;130(9):1561-1570. doi: 10.1038/s41416-024-02633-7. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
10
"For and against" factors influencing participation in personalized breast cancer screening programs: a qualitative systematic review until March 2022.影响参与个性化乳腺癌筛查项目的“支持与反对”因素:截至2022年3月的定性系统评价
Arch Public Health. 2024 Feb 22;82(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01248-x.
Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series-paper 1: introduction.考科蓝定性与实施方法小组指南系列——论文1:引言
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 May;97:35-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.09.025. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
4
"Promoting Early Presentation" intervention sustains increased breast cancer awareness in older women for three years: A randomized controlled trial.“促进早期就诊”干预措施使老年女性的乳腺癌知晓率提高并持续三年:一项随机对照试验。
J Med Screen. 2017 Sep;24(3):163-165. doi: 10.1177/0969141316667408. Epub 2016 Oct 9.
5
Women's Experiences of Inaccurate Breast Cancer Screening Results: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Meta-synthesis.乳腺癌筛查结果不准确时女性的经历:一项系统综述与定性元分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2016 Jul 1;16(16):1-22. eCollection 2016.
6
A crisis of visibility: The psychological consequences of false-positive screening mammograms, an interview study.可见性危机:筛查性乳房X光检查假阳性结果的心理影响,一项访谈研究
Br J Health Psychol. 2015 Nov;20(4):792-806. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12142. Epub 2015 May 6.
7
Perspectives on mammography after receipt of secondary screening owing to a false positive.因假阳性而接受二次筛查后的乳房 X 光摄影检查的看法。
Womens Health Issues. 2015 Mar-Apr;25(2):128-33. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.11.003. Epub 2015 Jan 31.
8
Improving screening recall services for women with false-positive mammograms: a comparison of qualitative evidence with UK guidelines.改善乳腺钼靶检查假阳性女性的筛查召回服务:定性证据与英国指南的比较
BMJ Open. 2015 Jan 23;5(1):e005855. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005855.
9
Offering informed choice about breast screening.提供有关乳房筛查的充分知情选择。
J Med Screen. 2014 Dec;21(4):194-200. doi: 10.1177/0969141314555350. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
10
A roller coaster of emotions and sense--coping with the perceived psychosocial consequences of a false-positive screening mammography.情绪与理智的过山车——应对乳腺钼靶筛查假阳性所带来的心理社会影响
J Clin Nurs. 2014 Jul;23(13-14):2053-62. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12426. Epub 2013 Dec 7.