Suppr超能文献

以埃索美拉唑为阳性对照药物的健康受试者和患者中艾普拉唑输注的疗效、安全性和药代动力学。

Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of ilaprazole infusion in healthy subjects and patients with esomeprazole as positive control.

机构信息

Clinical Pharmacology Research Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.

Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Nov;85(11):2547-2558. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14076. Epub 2019 Oct 15.

Abstract

AIMS

The objectives were to investigate the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of ilaprazole infusion in healthy subjects and patients with esomeprazole as positive control, and then recommend the dosage regimen for Phase 2b/3 studies.

METHODS

Three clinical studies were performed. First, 16 healthy subjects received infusion of ilaprazole 30 mg or esomeprazole 80 mg. Second, 12 healthy subjects received ilaprazole 20 mg followed by 10 mg once daily for 2 days. Finally, 20 patients with duodenal ulcers received ilaprazole 20 mg followed by 10 mg for 2 days or esomeprazole 40 mg twice daily for 3 days. Serial blood samples were collected and intragastric pH was recorded.

RESULTS

The mean percentages time of intragastric pH >6 was 63.6 and 51.7% for healthy subjects after receiving ilaprazole 30 mg and esomeprazole 80 mg. Linear pharmacokinetics was observed when the dose was increased to 30 mg but the effect was saturated. Ilaprazole 20 mg followed by 10 mg for 2 days provided higher plasma exposure in healthy subjects than patients, but the effect was comparable. After multiple administrations, ilaprazole provided similar effect to esomeprazole. Ilaprazole infusion was safe and well tolerated without serious adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Ilaprazole provided comparable effect of pH control to esomeprazole, with lower dose and fewer times of administration. There was no significant difference of ilaprazole between healthy subjects and patients regarding intragastric acid inhibition. A loading dose of ilaprazole 20 mg followed by 10 mg once daily for 2 days was recommended for Phase 2b/3 studies.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在考察以埃索美拉唑为阳性对照药物时,健康受试者和患者接受艾普拉唑输注的药代动力学、药效学和安全性,并为 2b/3 期研究推荐给药方案。

方法

进行了 3 项临床研究。首先,16 名健康受试者分别接受艾普拉唑 30mg 或埃索美拉唑 80mg 输注。其次,12 名健康受试者接受艾普拉唑 20mg 负荷剂量,然后每天 1 次给予 10mg,连续 2 天。最后,20 例十二指肠溃疡患者接受艾普拉唑 20mg 负荷剂量,然后每天 1 次给予 10mg,连续 2 天,或埃索美拉唑 40mg 每日 2 次,连续 3 天。连续采集血样并记录胃内 pH 值。

结果

健康受试者接受艾普拉唑 30mg 和埃索美拉唑 80mg 后,胃内 pH 值>6 的时间百分比分别为 63.6%和 51.7%。当剂量增加至 30mg 时观察到线性药代动力学,但效应达到饱和。健康受试者接受艾普拉唑 20mg 负荷剂量+10mg 维持剂量连续 2 天的方案,与患者相比,具有更高的血浆暴露量,但疗效相当。多次给药后,艾普拉唑的疗效与埃索美拉唑相似。艾普拉唑输注安全且耐受良好,无严重不良事件。

结论

艾普拉唑提供了与埃索美拉唑相当的 pH 控制效果,剂量更低,给药次数更少。健康受试者和患者的胃内酸抑制作用方面,艾普拉唑无显著差异。推荐 2b/3 期研究采用艾普拉唑 20mg 负荷剂量+10mg 维持剂量,每日 1 次,连续 2 天的给药方案。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.胃食管反流病的管理。
Gastroenterology. 2018 Jan;154(2):302-318. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.07.049. Epub 2017 Aug 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验