• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[全关节置换术后感染并发症患者住院费用的经济学分析 - 第1部分:全膝关节置换术]

[Economic Analysis of the Costs of Hospital Stay of Patients with Infection as a Complication of Total Replacements - Part 1: Total Knee Arthroplasty].

作者信息

Musil D, Šnorek M, Gallo J, Jahoda D, Stehlík J

机构信息

Ortopedické oddělení, Nemocnice České Budějovice, a.s.

出版信息

Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2019;86(3):173-180.

PMID:31333180
Abstract

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The study aims to quantify the costs of a hospital stay of patients with total knee periprosthetic joint infection throughout the period of treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS The group included patients who have been treated at our department for infection as a complication of total knee replacement since 1 January 2011, who have been provided with treatment (including complications) exclusively at the departments of Nemocnice České Budějovice, a.s. and whose treatment can be considered completed in 2018. The patients were included in the study regardless of the type of infection and method of treatment. The group consisted of 24 patients (11 men and 13 women). There were 2 cases of early postoperative infection, 6 cases of late postoperative infection and 16 cases of hematogenous infection. The group includes 17 patients treated by a two-stage reimplantation, 6 patients treated by a revision surgery with implant retention, and 1 patient treated by a one-stage replacement. In selected patients, all the reported points for all the hospital stays and costs incurred on a separately charged material were ascertained and the final sum was compared with the reimbursement obtained by the hospital in the DRG system valid for the respective year of treatment. The total costs were analysed and moreover, an analysis by type of infection and method of treatment was carried out. RESULTS The average costs of managing infection as a complication of TKA in our department amounted to CZK 405 864 (CZK 66 768-CZK 181 17). The average cost of a two-stage revision was CZK 497 487, the cost of a revision surgery with original implant retention was CZK 175 312. The reimbursement in respect of the monitored cases in the DRG system equalled CZK 276 230 (CZK 40 943-CZK 848 401). The aforementioned suggests that the average loss per a treated patient is CZK 129 635 (CZK + 26 066Kč-CZK -332 774). DISCUSION Our study is in agreement with recent literature, when confirming that the care associated with infections as a complication of TKA is very costly (especially in case of a two-stage reimplantation) and also that this care is not fully covered by the health insurance company. The reimbursement made by the health insurance companies does not cover on average 1/3 of the costs of care for an infectious patient. Theoretically, the reasons behind the reduced reimbursement may be sanctions which, however, cannot be accepted in case of late hematogenous infections which constituted more than 50% in our group. CONCLUSIONS Our study presented the actual costs associated with the care of TKA infection. It makes sense that the most expensive is the two-stage reimplantation, which is nevertheless still considered to be the gold standard procedure in chronic TKA infection. High costs of therapy together with the requirement of expert care would justify the introduction of care provided by specialised centres. In this case, centralisation could result in a more efficient use of funds and improvement of the quality of provided care. Key words:total knee arthroplasty, PJI - periprostetic joint infection, economic analysis. ÚVOD.

摘要

研究目的 本研究旨在量化全膝关节置换术后假体周围关节感染患者整个治疗期间的住院费用。材料与方法 该组患者包括自2011年1月1日起在我科接受治疗的因全膝关节置换并发症感染的患者,这些患者仅在捷克布杰约维采医院接受治疗(包括并发症治疗),且其治疗在2018年可视为完成。无论感染类型和治疗方法如何,患者均纳入研究。该组由24例患者组成(11例男性和13例女性)。有2例术后早期感染,6例术后晚期感染和16例血源性感染。该组包括17例接受两期翻修术治疗的患者,6例接受保留假体翻修手术治疗的患者,以及1例接受一期置换治疗的患者。在选定的患者中,确定了所有住院期间报告的所有要点以及单独收费材料产生的费用,并将最终金额与医院在相应治疗年份有效的疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)系统中获得的报销金额进行比较。分析了总成本,此外,还按感染类型和治疗方法进行了分析。结果 我科将感染作为全膝关节置换并发症进行管理的平均费用为405 864捷克克朗(66 768捷克克朗 - 181 17捷克克朗)。两期翻修的平均费用为497 487捷克克朗(保留原假体的翻修手术费用为175 312捷克克朗)。DRG系统中监测病例的报销金额为276 230捷克克朗(40 943捷克克朗 - 848 401捷克克朗)。上述情况表明,每位接受治疗的患者平均损失为129 635捷克克朗(+26 066捷克克朗 - -332 774捷克克朗)。讨论 我们的研究与近期文献一致,证实与全膝关节置换并发症感染相关的护理成本非常高(特别是在两期翻修的情况下),而且这种护理未被健康保险公司完全覆盖。健康保险公司的报销平均不涵盖感染患者护理费用的三分之一。理论上,报销减少的原因可能是制裁,然而,对于我们组中占比超过50%的晚期血源性感染情况,这是不能接受的。结论 我们的研究展示了全膝关节置换感染护理的实际成本。两期翻修成本最高是合理的,不过它仍然被认为是慢性全膝关节置换感染的金标准手术。治疗成本高以及对专家护理的需求将证明引入由专业中心提供护理的合理性。在这种情况下,集中化可能会更有效地利用资金并提高所提供护理的质量。关键词:全膝关节置换术,假体周围关节感染,经济分析。引言。

相似文献

1
[Economic Analysis of the Costs of Hospital Stay of Patients with Infection as a Complication of Total Replacements - Part 1: Total Knee Arthroplasty].[全关节置换术后感染并发症患者住院费用的经济学分析 - 第1部分:全膝关节置换术]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2019;86(3):173-180.
2
[Economic Analysis of the Costs of Hospital Stay of Patients with Infection as a Complication of Total Replacements - Part 2: Total Hip Arthroplasty].[全关节置换术后感染并发症患者住院费用的经济学分析 - 第二部分:全髋关节置换术]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2019;86(4):241-248.
3
[Analysis of Costs Associated with Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty].[全膝关节置换翻修术相关成本分析]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2018;85(6):418-426.
4
[Reduction of Treatment Duration in Periprosthetic Infection with a Fast-Track Concept Is Economically Not Feasible].[采用快速康复理念缩短人工关节周围感染治疗时间在经济上不可行]
Z Orthop Unfall. 2015 Dec;153(6):618-23. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1557858. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
5
Economic Analysis of 4221 Revisions Due to Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Poland.波兰因人工关节周围感染导致的4221例翻修手术的经济分析
Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2017 Jan 26;19(1):33-44. doi: 10.5604/15093492.1235276.
6
Reconsidering Strategies for Managing Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Using Decision Analytics to Find the Optimal Strategy Between One-Stage and Two-Stage Total Knee Revision.重新考虑全膝关节置换术慢性假体周围关节感染的治疗策略:使用决策分析在单阶段和双阶段全膝关节翻修之间找到最佳策略。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Jan 2;101(1):14-24. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00874.
7
Which Clinical and Patient Factors Influence the National Economic Burden of Hospital Readmissions After Total Joint Arthroplasty?哪些临床和患者因素会影响全关节置换术后再入院的国家经济负担?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Dec;475(12):2926-2937. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5244-6.
8
[Our experience with revision total knee arthroplasty].[我们在全膝关节置换翻修术中的经验]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2005;72(1):6-15.
9
Are Bundled Payments a Viable Reimbursement Model for Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty?捆绑支付是否是翻修全关节置换术可行的报销模式?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Dec;474(12):2714-2721. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4953-6. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
10
Comparison of two-stage revision arthroplasty and intramedullary arthrodesis in patients with failed infected knee arthroplasty.感染性膝关节置换失败患者的两阶段翻修关节成形术与髓内关节固定术的比较
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Oct;138(10):1443-1452. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-3007-9. Epub 2018 Jul 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Update on Focal Infection Management: A Czech Interdisciplinary Consensus.关于局部感染管理的最新进展:捷克跨学科共识。
Int Dent J. 2024 Jun;74(3):510-518. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2023.11.001. Epub 2023 Dec 3.
2
Cost of septic and aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.关节置换术后感染和无菌性松动的治疗费用:系统评价
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Aug 18;22(1):706. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04597-8.
3
A retrospective comparison of costs for the primary and revision total knee arthroplasty in Turkey.土耳其初次和翻修全膝关节置换术费用的回顾性比较。
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2020 Sep;54(5):541-545. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2020.19114.
4
Prevention of Prosthetic Joint Infection: From Traditional Approaches towards Quality Improvement and Data Mining.人工关节感染的预防:从传统方法到质量改进与数据挖掘
J Clin Med. 2020 Jul 11;9(7):2190. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072190.