Suppr超能文献

关节置换术后感染和无菌性松动的治疗费用:系统评价

Cost of septic and aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

机构信息

Centre for Applied Health Economics, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, 170 Kessels Road, Nathan, Queensland, 4111, Australia.

Menzies Health Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Aug 18;22(1):706. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04597-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The increasing incidence of primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has led to an increase in both the incidence and the cost burden of revision TKA procedures. This study aimed to review the literature on the cost of revision TKA for septic and aseptic causes and to identify the major cost components contributing to the cost burden.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE (OvidSp), Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EconLit, and Google Scholar to identify relevant studies. Selection, data extraction and assessment of the risk of bias and cost transparency within the studies were conducted by two independent reviewers, after which the cost data were analysed narratively for 1- or 2-stage septic revision without re-revision; 2-stage septic revision with re-revision; and aseptic revision with and without re-revision, respectively. The major cost components identified in the respective studies were also reported.

RESULTS

The direct medical cost from the healthcare provider perspective for high-income countries for 2-stage septic revision with re-revision ranged from US$66,629 to US$81,938, which can be about 2.5 times the cost of 1- or 2-stage septic revision without re-revision, (range: US$24,027 - US$38,109), which can be about double the cost of aseptic revision without re-revision (range: US$13,910 - US$29,213). The major cost components were the perioperative cost (33%), prosthesis cost (28%), and hospital ward stay cost (22%).

CONCLUSIONS

Septic TKA revision with re-revision for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) increases the cost burden of revision TKA by 4 times when compared to aseptic single-stage revision and by 2.5 times when compared to septic TKA revision that does not undergo re-revision. Cost reductions can be achieved by reducing the number of primary TKA that develop PJI, avoidance of re-revisions for PJI, and reduction in the length of stay after revision.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO; CRD42020171988 .

摘要

背景

原发性全膝关节置换术(TKA)的发病率不断增加,导致翻修 TKA 手术的发病率和成本负担均增加。本研究旨在综述翻修 TKA 治疗感染性和非感染性病因的成本,并确定导致成本负担的主要成本构成。

方法

我们检索了 MEDLINE(OvidSp)、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane 图书馆、EconLit 和 Google Scholar,以确定相关研究。两名独立评审员进行了研究选择、数据提取以及对偏倚风险和成本透明度的评估,然后分别对 1 期或 2 期感染性翻修而无需再次翻修、2 期感染性翻修伴再次翻修、以及伴或不伴再次翻修的非感染性翻修的成本数据进行了叙述性分析。此外,还报告了各自研究中确定的主要成本构成。

结果

高收入国家从医疗服务提供者角度来看,2 期感染性翻修伴再次翻修的直接医疗成本为 66629 美元至 81938 美元,是 1 期或 2 期感染性翻修而无需再次翻修的成本(24027 美元至 38109 美元)的 2.5 倍左右,是非感染性翻修而无需再次翻修的成本(13910 美元至 29213 美元)的两倍左右。主要成本构成是围手术期成本(33%)、假体成本(28%)和住院病房费用(22%)。

结论

与非感染性单期翻修相比,对于假体周围关节感染(PJI)的感染性 TKA 再次翻修使翻修 TKA 的成本负担增加了 4 倍,与不进行再次翻修的感染性 TKA 翻修相比增加了 2.5 倍。通过减少发生 PJI 的初次 TKA 数量、避免 PJI 的再次翻修以及减少翻修后的住院时间,可以降低成本。

试验注册

PROSPERO;CRD42020171988。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5ab/8371784/afeab3ef81ba/12891_2021_4597_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验