Suppr超能文献

长期居家护理对死亡率、功能状态及未满足需求的影响。

Impact of long-term home care on mortality, functional status, and unmet needs.

作者信息

Hughes S L, Conrad K J, Manheim L M, Edelman P L

机构信息

Center for Health Services and Policy Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 1988 Jun;23(2):269-94.

Abstract

This article reports the outcomes of a four-year follow-up evaluation of the Five Hospital Program, a long-term home care program in Chicago. Outcomes assessed include the mortality, comprehensive functional status, and perceived unmet needs of its frail elderly clientele (mean age 81 years at entry). The evaluation utilized a pretest, multiple posttest design with a comparison group consisting of similarly elderly and impaired individuals receiving OAA Title III-C home-delivered meals. Consecutively accepted treatment (N = 157) and comparison group clients (N = 156) were interviewed using the OARS Multidimensional Functional Assessment Questionnaire at baseline, 9 months, and 48 months after acceptance to care. A multivariate analysis of mortality rates revealed no between-group differences attributable to treatment on this outcome. Major findings included significantly better cognitive functioning and reduced unmet needs in the treatment group at nine months. A longer-range, continued beneficial effect of treatment on cognitive status was also observed at 48 months. We conclude that long-term home care provided important benefits to clients at both 9 and 48 months, with no effect on mortality. However, we suggest that the four-year findings be interpreted with caution, since only a small percentage of clients (18 percent) were still alive and receiving active care in the community at that time.

摘要

本文报告了对芝加哥一项长期居家护理项目——“五院项目”进行的为期四年的随访评估结果。评估的结果包括其体弱老年客户(入院时平均年龄81岁)的死亡率、综合功能状况以及未满足的需求。该评估采用了预测试、多次后测试设计,对照组由接受《老年人法案》第三章C部分上门送餐服务的类似老年且身体有缺陷的个体组成。连续接受治疗的客户(N = 157)和对照组客户(N = 156)在接受护理的基线、9个月和48个月时,使用OARS多维功能评估问卷进行了访谈。对死亡率的多变量分析显示,该结果在治疗组和对照组之间没有差异。主要发现包括,治疗组在9个月时认知功能显著改善,未满足的需求减少。在48个月时也观察到治疗对认知状态有更长期、持续的有益影响。我们得出结论,长期居家护理在9个月和48个月时都为客户带来了重要益处,但对死亡率没有影响。然而,我们建议谨慎解读四年的研究结果,因为当时只有一小部分客户(18%)仍在世并在社区接受积极护理。

相似文献

3
Evaluation of a long-term home care program.一项长期居家护理项目的评估
Med Care. 1984 May;22(5):460-75. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198405000-00010.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
The triage experiment in coordinated care for the elderly.老年人协同护理中的分诊实验。
Am J Public Health. 1981 Sep;71(9):991-1003. doi: 10.2105/ajph.71.9.991.
2
Community-based long-term care and mortality: preliminary findings of Georgia's alternative health services project.
Gerontologist. 1980 Jun;20(3 Pt 1):372-9. doi: 10.1093/geront/20.3_part_1.372.
3
Progress in development of the index of ADL.日常生活活动能力指数的发展进展。
Gerontologist. 1970 Spring;10(1):20-30. doi: 10.1093/geront/10.1_part_1.20.
9
Patient outcomes in alternative long-term care settings.
Med Care. 1978 Jun;16(6):439-52. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197806000-00001.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验