Hughes S L, Conrad K J, Manheim L M, Edelman P L
Center for Health Services and Policy Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208.
Health Serv Res. 1988 Jun;23(2):269-94.
This article reports the outcomes of a four-year follow-up evaluation of the Five Hospital Program, a long-term home care program in Chicago. Outcomes assessed include the mortality, comprehensive functional status, and perceived unmet needs of its frail elderly clientele (mean age 81 years at entry). The evaluation utilized a pretest, multiple posttest design with a comparison group consisting of similarly elderly and impaired individuals receiving OAA Title III-C home-delivered meals. Consecutively accepted treatment (N = 157) and comparison group clients (N = 156) were interviewed using the OARS Multidimensional Functional Assessment Questionnaire at baseline, 9 months, and 48 months after acceptance to care. A multivariate analysis of mortality rates revealed no between-group differences attributable to treatment on this outcome. Major findings included significantly better cognitive functioning and reduced unmet needs in the treatment group at nine months. A longer-range, continued beneficial effect of treatment on cognitive status was also observed at 48 months. We conclude that long-term home care provided important benefits to clients at both 9 and 48 months, with no effect on mortality. However, we suggest that the four-year findings be interpreted with caution, since only a small percentage of clients (18 percent) were still alive and receiving active care in the community at that time.
本文报告了对芝加哥一项长期居家护理项目——“五院项目”进行的为期四年的随访评估结果。评估的结果包括其体弱老年客户(入院时平均年龄81岁)的死亡率、综合功能状况以及未满足的需求。该评估采用了预测试、多次后测试设计,对照组由接受《老年人法案》第三章C部分上门送餐服务的类似老年且身体有缺陷的个体组成。连续接受治疗的客户(N = 157)和对照组客户(N = 156)在接受护理的基线、9个月和48个月时,使用OARS多维功能评估问卷进行了访谈。对死亡率的多变量分析显示,该结果在治疗组和对照组之间没有差异。主要发现包括,治疗组在9个月时认知功能显著改善,未满足的需求减少。在48个月时也观察到治疗对认知状态有更长期、持续的有益影响。我们得出结论,长期居家护理在9个月和48个月时都为客户带来了重要益处,但对死亡率没有影响。然而,我们建议谨慎解读四年的研究结果,因为当时只有一小部分客户(18%)仍在世并在社区接受积极护理。