World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Vaccine Immunology, Departments of Pathology-Immunology and Pediatrics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Sanofi-Pasteur R&D, Marcy l'Etoile, France.
Front Immunol. 2019 Jul 3;10:1520. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01520. eCollection 2019.
Pertussis is still observed in many countries despite of high vaccine coverage. Acellular pertussis (aP) vaccination is widely implemented in many countries as primary series in infants and as boosters in school-entry/adolescents/adults (including pregnant women in some). One novel strategy to improve the reactivation of aP-vaccine primed immunity could be to include genetically- detoxified pertussis toxin and novel adjuvants in aP vaccine boosters. Their preclinical evaluation is not straightforward, as it requires mimicking the human situation where T and B memory cells may persist longer than vaccine-induced circulating antibodies. Toward this objective, we developed a novel murine model including two consecutive adoptive transfers of the memory cells induced by priming and boosting, respectively. Using this model, we assessed the capacity of three novel aP vaccine candidates including genetically-detoxified pertussis toxin, pertactin, filamentous hemagglutinin, and fimbriae adsorbed to aluminum hydroxide, supplemented-or not-with Toll-Like-Receptor 4 or 9 agonists (TLR4A, TLR9A), to reactivate aP vaccine-induced immune memory and protection, reflected by bacterial clearance. In the conventional murine immunization model, TLR4A- and TLR9A-containing aP formulations induced similar aP-specific IgG antibody responses and protection against bacterial lung colonization as current aP vaccines, despite IL-5 down-modulation by both TLR4A and TLR9A and IL-17 up-modulation by TLR4A. In the absence of serum antibodies at time of boosting or exposure, TLR4A- and TLR9A-containing formulations both enhanced vaccine antibody recall compared to current aP formulations. Unexpectedly, however, protection was only increased by the TLR9A-containing vaccine, through both earlier bacterial control and accelerated clearance. This suggests that TLR9A-containing aP vaccines may better reactivate aP vaccine-primed pertussis memory and enhance protection than current or TLR4A-adjuvanted aP vaccines.
尽管疫苗接种率很高,但百日咳仍在许多国家流行。无细胞百日咳(aP)疫苗已在许多国家广泛用于婴儿的基础系列和学校入学/青少年/成人(包括一些孕妇)的加强针。提高 aP 疫苗引发的免疫记忆再激活的一种新策略可能是在 aP 疫苗加强针中加入基因解毒的百日咳毒素和新型佐剂。由于需要模拟人类情况,即 T 和 B 记忆细胞可能比疫苗诱导的循环抗体持续时间更长,因此它们的临床前评估并不简单。为了实现这一目标,我们开发了一种新型的小鼠模型,其中包括分别通过启动和加强分别诱导的记忆细胞的两次连续过继转移。使用该模型,我们评估了三种新型 aP 疫苗候选物(包括基因解毒的百日咳毒素、 pertactin、丝状血凝素和纤毛,吸附到氢氧化铝上,并且补充或不补充 Toll 样受体 4 或 9 激动剂(TLR4A、TLR9A)),以重新激活 aP 疫苗诱导的免疫记忆和保护作用,反映为细菌清除。在传统的小鼠免疫模型中,TLR4A 和 TLR9A 包含的 aP 制剂诱导相似的 aP 特异性 IgG 抗体反应和对细菌肺部定植的保护作用,与当前的 aP 疫苗一样,尽管 TLR4A 和 TLR9A 下调了 IL-5,而 TLR4A 上调了 IL-17。在加强或暴露时没有血清抗体的情况下,TLR4A 和 TLR9A 包含的制剂都比当前的 aP 制剂增强了疫苗抗体的回忆。然而,出乎意料的是,只有含有 TLR9A 的疫苗增加了保护作用,这是通过更早的细菌控制和更快的清除来实现的。这表明含有 TLR9A 的 aP 疫苗可能比当前或 TLR4A 佐剂的 aP 疫苗更好地重新激活 aP 疫苗引发的百日咳记忆并增强保护作用。