• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

上肢假肢生活质量及弃用原因的横断面国际多中心研究

Cross-sectional International Multicenter Study on Quality of Life and Reasons for Abandonment of Upper Limb Prostheses.

作者信息

Yamamoto Michiro, Chung Kevin C, Sterbenz Jennifer, Shauver Melissa J, Tanaka Hirotaka, Nakamura Takashi, Oba Jumpei, Chin Takaaki, Hirata Hitoshi

机构信息

Department of Hand Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.

Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Mich.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 May 24;7(5):e2205. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002205. eCollection 2019 May.

DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000002205
PMID:31333938
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6571339/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This multicenter study aimed to examine the reasons for prosthesis rejection and assess the quality of life (QOL) among patients with upper limb deficiency.

METHODS

Three rehabilitation centers in Japan and 1 academic medical center in the United States participated. Patients between the age of 12 and 75 years with unilateral or bilateral upper limb absence from the level of wrist to shoulder disarticulation were included. Two questionnaires were used, an original questionnaire on prosthesis use and the EQ-5D, which were completed by both the participant and a live-in proxy.

RESULTS

Of the 367 patients with upper limb loss invited, 174 patients participated in this study. Eighty percent of the study population were male patients. The most common amputation level was transradial. Trauma was the most common cause of limb loss. The prosthesis rejection rate was 9% (n = 16). The most common reason for abandonment was a lack of prosthesis functionality. Ten of 16 prosthesis nonusers (63%) and 59 prosthesis users (38%) were unemployed or students. The mean EQ-5D utility score was significantly higher in prosthesis users than in nonusers (0.762 versus 0.628, < 0.01). Live-in proxies significantly overestimated QOL in male patients (0.77 versus 0.807, =0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The current prosthesis rejection rate is low. QOL was significantly higher in prosthesis users than in nonusers. More prosthesis users were employed compared with nonusers. Care should be taken not to overestimate the QOL of male patients with upper limb loss as their proxies often did.

摘要

背景

这项多中心研究旨在探究上肢缺失患者假体排斥的原因,并评估其生活质量(QOL)。

方法

日本的三个康复中心和美国的一个学术医疗中心参与了研究。纳入年龄在12至75岁之间、单侧或双侧上肢从腕部至肩关节离断缺失的患者。使用了两份问卷,一份是关于假体使用的原始问卷,另一份是EQ-5D问卷,由参与者及其同住的代理人完成。

结果

在邀请的367例上肢缺失患者中,174例患者参与了本研究。研究人群中80%为男性患者。最常见的截肢水平是经桡骨截肢。创伤是肢体缺失最常见的原因。假体排斥率为9%(n = 16)。放弃使用假体最常见的原因是假体功能不足。16例未使用假体的患者中有10例(63%)以及59例使用假体的患者中有59例(38%)处于失业状态或为学生。假体使用者的平均EQ-5D效用评分显著高于未使用者(0.762对0.628,<0.01)。同住的代理人显著高估了男性患者的生活质量(0.77对0.807,=0.01)。

结论

当前假体排斥率较低。假体使用者的生活质量显著高于未使用者。与未使用者相比,更多的假体使用者有工作。应注意避免像代理人常做的那样高估上肢缺失男性患者的生活质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bdf/6571339/a753d31b8dc4/gox-7-e2205-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bdf/6571339/80a1c8edc1fc/gox-7-e2205-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bdf/6571339/6f8e9130fa10/gox-7-e2205-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bdf/6571339/420313e2530f/gox-7-e2205-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bdf/6571339/47d64a7cf82f/gox-7-e2205-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bdf/6571339/4f2c6d70ff38/gox-7-e2205-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bdf/6571339/6f1472ecb074/gox-7-e2205-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bdf/6571339/a753d31b8dc4/gox-7-e2205-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bdf/6571339/80a1c8edc1fc/gox-7-e2205-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bdf/6571339/6f8e9130fa10/gox-7-e2205-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bdf/6571339/420313e2530f/gox-7-e2205-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bdf/6571339/47d64a7cf82f/gox-7-e2205-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bdf/6571339/4f2c6d70ff38/gox-7-e2205-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bdf/6571339/6f1472ecb074/gox-7-e2205-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bdf/6571339/a753d31b8dc4/gox-7-e2205-g011.jpg

相似文献

1
Cross-sectional International Multicenter Study on Quality of Life and Reasons for Abandonment of Upper Limb Prostheses.上肢假肢生活质量及弃用原因的横断面国际多中心研究
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 May 24;7(5):e2205. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002205. eCollection 2019 May.
2
Functional outcome of patients with proximal upper limb deficiency--acquired and congenital.上肢近端缺损患者(后天性和先天性)的功能结局
Clin Rehabil. 2004 Mar;18(2):172-7. doi: 10.1191/0269215504cr716oa.
3
Function and Quality of Life of Unilateral Major Upper Limb Amputees: Effect of Prosthesis Use and Type.单侧上肢主要截肢者的功能和生活质量:假肢使用和类型的影响。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Aug;101(8):1396-1406. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.04.003. Epub 2020 May 11.
4
User-relevant factors determining prosthesis choice in persons with major unilateral upper limb defects: A meta-synthesis of qualitative literature and focus group results.影响上肢重大肢体缺陷患者选择假体因素的患者相关因素:定性文献和焦点小组结果的元综合分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 30;15(6):e0234342. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234342. eCollection 2020.
5
Upper-limb prosthetics: critical factors in device abandonment.上肢假肢:导致装置弃用的关键因素。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Dec;86(12):977-87. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181587f6c.
6
Application and measurement properties of EQ-5D to measure quality of life in patients with upper extremity orthopaedic disorders: a systematic literature review.EQ-5D在测量上肢骨科疾病患者生活质量中的应用及测量属性:一项系统文献综述
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Jul;138(7):953-961. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-2933-x. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
7
Adjustment and Satisfaction with Prosthesis Among People after Upper Limb Amputation in Slovenia.斯洛文尼亚上肢截肢者的假肢调整和满意度。
Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2020 Apr 30;22(2):85-93. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0014.1165.
8
Assessing physical function in adult acquired major upper-limb amputees by combining the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Outcome Questionnaire and clinical examination.采用上肢能力丧失残疾问卷(DASH)和临床检查评估成年后天性上肢主要截肢者的身体功能。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Oct;92(10):1636-45. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.04.019. Epub 2011 Aug 27.
9
Comparison of range-of-motion and variability in upper body movements between transradial prosthesis users and able-bodied controls when executing goal-oriented tasks.经桡动脉假肢使用者与健全对照者在执行目标导向任务时上肢运动的活动范围和变异性比较。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014 Sep 6;11:132. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-132.
10
Implications of prosthesis funding structures on the use of prostheses: experiences of individuals with upper limb absence.假肢资助结构对假肢使用的影响:上肢缺失者的经历
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2011 Jun;35(2):215-24. doi: 10.1177/0309364611401776. Epub 2011 Apr 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Prosthesis usability experience is associated with extent of upper limb prosthesis adoption: A Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) analysis.假体可用性体验与上肢假肢的使用程度有关:结构方程建模(SEM)分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 25;19(6):e0299155. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299155. eCollection 2024.
2
Developing a Novel Prosthetic Hand with Wireless Wearable Sensor Technology Based on User Perspectives: A Pilot Study.基于用户视角的新型无线可穿戴传感器技术假肢手的研制:一项初步研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Apr 26;24(9):2765. doi: 10.3390/s24092765.
3
Development and validation of the coffee task: a novel functional assessment for prosthetic grip selection.

本文引用的文献

1
New developments in prosthetic arm systems.假肢手臂系统的新进展。
Orthop Res Rev. 2016 Jul 7;8:31-39. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S71468. eCollection 2016.
2
Cost-effectiveness of a randomised trial of physical activity in Alzheimer's disease: a secondary analysis exploring patient and proxy-reported health-related quality of life measures in Denmark.阿尔茨海默病身体活动随机试验的成本效益:丹麦一项探索患者及代理人报告的健康相关生活质量指标的二次分析
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 14;7(6):e015217. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015217.
3
Socioeconomic value of intervention for chronic pain.
咖啡任务的开发和验证:一种用于选择假肢抓握功能的新的功能评估方法。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024 Feb 8;21(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12984-024-01307-y.
4
Patient-reported significant disability after major traumatic upper extremity amputation.患者报告上肢主要创伤性截肢后显著残疾。
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2024 Sep;49(8):1017-1022. doi: 10.1177/17531934231215791. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
5
Prevalence and predictors of unmet need for upper limb prostheses: An observational cohort study.上肢假肢未满足需求的患病率及预测因素:一项观察性队列研究。
J Prosthet Orthot. 2023 Jul 11;2023. doi: 10.1097/JPO.0000000000000477.
6
Upper limb prostheses: bridging the sensory gap.上肢假肢:弥合感觉差距。
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2023 Mar;48(3):182-190. doi: 10.1177/17531934221131756. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
7
Economic evaluation of upper limb prostheses in the Netherlands including the cost-effectiveness of multi-grip versus standard myoelectric hand prostheses.荷兰上肢假肢的经济评价,包括多抓握与标准肌电手假肢的成本效益比较。
Disabil Rehabil. 2023 Dec;45(25):4311-4321. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2151653. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
8
Hand Transplants, Daily Functioning, and the Human Capacity for Limb Regeneration.手部移植、日常功能与人类肢体再生能力
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022 Mar 4;10:812124. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.812124. eCollection 2022.
9
Health-Related Quality of Life and Rehabilitation Costs of Patients with Amputated Limb.截肢患者的健康相关生活质量和康复费用。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2021;1337:237-243. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-78771-4_27.
10
Factors influencing perceived function in the upper limb prosthesis user population.影响上肢假肢使用者群体感知功能的因素。
PM R. 2023 Jan;15(1):69-79. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12697. Epub 2021 Sep 26.
慢性疼痛干预的社会经济价值。
J Anesth. 2016 Aug;30(4):553-61. doi: 10.1007/s00540-016-2162-9. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
4
Swedish translation and validation of a web-based questionnaire for registration of overuse problems.基于网络的过度使用问题登记调查问卷的瑞典语翻译与验证
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015 Feb;25(1):104-9. doi: 10.1111/sms.12157. Epub 2013 Dec 3.
5
Development and validation of psychosocial determinants measures of physical activity among Iranian adolescent girls.伊朗少女身体活动心理社会决定因素测量方法的开发与验证
BMC Public Health. 2008 May 7;8:150. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-150.
6
Cost utility analysis of knee prosthesis with complete microprocessor control (C-leg) compared with mechanical technology in trans-femoral amputees.完全微处理器控制的膝关节假体(C型腿)与机械技术在经股骨截肢者中的成本效用分析。
Eur J Health Econ. 2009 Feb;10(1):47-55. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0102-9. Epub 2008 Apr 1.
7
Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050.估算2005年至2050年美国肢体缺失的患病率。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Mar;89(3):422-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.005.
8
Upper-limb prosthetics: critical factors in device abandonment.上肢假肢:导致装置弃用的关键因素。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Dec;86(12):977-87. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181587f6c.
9
Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: a survey of the last 25 years.上肢假肢的使用与弃用:过去25年的调查
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2007 Sep;31(3):236-57. doi: 10.1080/03093640600994581.
10
Impact of prostheses on function and quality of life for children with unilateral congenital below-the-elbow deficiency.假肢对单侧先天性肘下肢体缺损儿童功能和生活质量的影响。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Nov;88(11):2356-65. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.01146.