Fitzpatrick Susan M, Brogan David, Grover Prateek
James S. McDonnell Foundation, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022 Mar 4;10:812124. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.812124. eCollection 2022.
Unlike some of our invertebrate and vertebrate cousins with the capacity to regenerate limbs after traumatic loss, humans do not have the ability to regrow arms or legs lost to injury or disease. For the millions of people worldwide who have lost a limb after birth, the primary route to regaining function and minimizing future complications is rehabilitation, prosthetic devices, assistive aids, health system robustness, and social safety net structures. The majority of limbs lost are lower limbs (legs), with diabetes and vascular disorders being significant causal contributors. Upper limbs (arms) are lost primarily because of trauma; digits and hands are the most common levels of loss. Even if much of the arm remains intact, upper limb amputation significantly impacts function, largely due to the loss of the hand. Human hands are marvels of evolution and permit a dexterity that enables a wide variety of function not readily replaced by devices. It is not surprising, therefore, for some individuals, dissatisfaction with available prosthetic options coupled with remarkable advances in hand surgery techniques is resulting in patients undertaking the rigors of a hand transplantation. While not "regeneration" in the sense of the enviable ability with which Axolotls can replace a lost limb, hand transplants do require significant regeneration of tissues and nerves. Regaining sophisticated hand functions also depends on "reconnecting" the donated hand with the areas of the human brain responsible for the sensory and motor processing required for complex actions. Human hand transplants are not without controversy and raise interesting challenges regarding the human regenerative capacity and the status of transplants for enabling function. More investigation is needed to address medical and ethical questions prior to expansion of hand transplants to a wider patient population.
与我们一些能够在遭受创伤性肢体缺失后再生肢体的无脊椎动物和脊椎动物近亲不同,人类没有能力重新长出因受伤或疾病而失去的手臂或腿。对于全球数百万出生后失去肢体的人来说,恢复功能并将未来并发症降至最低的主要途径是康复、假肢装置、辅助器具、健全的卫生系统以及社会安全网结构。大多数失去的肢体是下肢(腿),糖尿病和血管疾病是主要的致病因素。上肢(手臂)主要因创伤而失去;手指和手部是最常见的缺失部位。即使大部分手臂仍完好无损,上肢截肢也会严重影响功能,这主要是由于手部的缺失。人类的手是进化的奇迹,具有灵巧性,能实现各种各样的功能,而这些功能很难被设备轻易替代。因此,对于一些人来说,对现有假肢选择的不满,再加上手部手术技术的显著进步,导致患者愿意接受手部移植的严苛过程,也就不足为奇了。虽然手部移植并非像蝾螈那样令人羡慕地能够替换失去的肢体的“再生”,但它确实需要组织和神经的大量再生。恢复复杂的手部功能还取决于将捐赠的手与负责复杂动作所需的感觉和运动处理的人脑区域“重新连接”。人类手部移植并非没有争议,并且在人类再生能力以及移植以实现功能的地位方面提出了有趣的挑战。在将手部移植扩大到更广泛的患者群体之前,需要进行更多的研究来解决医学和伦理问题。