Limping Following Primary Total Hip Replacement: Comparison of 3 Surgical Approaches.

BACKGROUND

Limping following total hip replacement affects clinical outcome and patient satisfaction. The purpose of the present study was to determine the prevalence of limping following the posterior approach, the direct lateral approach, and the modified anterolateral Watson-Jones approach for primary total hip replacement, performed by 1 surgeon.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records for 152 patients who had undergone unilateral primary total hip replacement and assessed the prevalence of limping ≥2 years after surgery as a function of the surgical approach. Patients were divided into 3 groups, according to the surgical approach: (1) 43 patients, posterior approach; (2) 53 patients, direct lateral approach; and (3) 56 patients, modified anterolateral Watson-Jones approach. The mean duration of follow-up was 65.04 months (range, 24 to 117 months). No patients were lost to follow-up.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of the limping rates (6.98%, 7.55%, and 3.57% for the posterior approach, direct lateral approach, and modified anterolateral Watson-Jones approach, respectively; p = 0.64). No patient had severe limping. The Harris hip score, the alignment of the acetabular component, and blood loss were not significantly different between the 3 groups. However, operative time was significantly longer for the modified anterolateral Watson-Jones approach (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of limping was similar ≥2 years after primary total hip replacement, irrespective of the surgical approach.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.